Sunette Bridges facebook hate speech case

faniedry said:
she tries to do good? by specifically inciting racial hate? can't agree with you on that.
Click to expand...

she feeds poor white communities and does a lot of marches/interviews/charity. even if it's misguided and a form or racism/tribalism, she isn't 100% completely rotten, and it's a hard position to be in because all bets on, if she were to give a friendly hug to a black person, her very own community would tear her to shreds for touching a M**d :p
 
STS said:
she feeds poor white communities and does a lot of marches/interviews/charity. even if it's misguided and a form or racism/tribalism, she isn't 100% completely rotten, and it's a hard position to be in because all bets on, if she were to give a friendly hug to a black person, her very own community would tear her to shreds for touching a M**d :p
Click to expand...

Yeh, apartheid also had a good side... for whites. don't think she'll do feed-athons and charity stuff for blacks only. my opinion of course.
 
faniedry said:
Calling a spade a spade is one thing, but inciting hate toward a specific race is another. It's definitely not "calling a spade a spade".
Click to expand...

Any proof of this? She only stated the facts.

OrbitalDawn said:
Didn't call a spade a spade, called a spade a bulldozer.
Click to expand...

Again, no exaggeration was involved. It was still a spade by the end.
 
Ho3n3r said:
Any proof of this? She only stated the facts.

Again, no exaggeration was involved. It was still a spade by the end.
Click to expand...

The proof is not in what she is saying, but what she isn't. Why specifically black-on-white? What about the poor whites that were murdered by other whites? Do they not count? Or by colourereds? Or indians? Do they not deserve a mention?


If she is worried about her race (the whites) then say white people are getting murdered... why mention the colour of the attacker at all.
 
Pitbull said:
Whooaaaa...

No one said that. It was in reference to the killers. I agree such killers of any race is savage don't you agree.
Click to expand...
Refer to the post not the OP...

Let me state it another way as well: So white murderers of white victims are not savages?
 
Atleast we know now that Nicci isn't Sunette. Otherwise she would've used words like charous, rooti's and cape flats..
 
Pitbull said:
Whooaaaa...

No one said that. It was in reference to the killers. I agree such killers of any race is savage don't you agree.
Click to expand...

She should have just gone with "savages" because "black savages" is just not acceptable.
And why single out only white victims?
 
Ho3n3r said:
Any proof of this? She only stated the facts.



Again, no exaggeration was involved. It was still a spade by the end.
Click to expand...

Actually, there were 20,000 murders last year. Of which 217 was "black-on-white" according to her. So she was basically "calling a spade, only a handle" (less actually).
 
Pitbull said:
Whooaaaa...

No one said that. It was in reference to the killers. I agree such killers of any race is savage don't you agree.
Click to expand...

"Black" savages. No excuses. It's obvious that she's a racist as ****. Like Nicci. ****ing savages might work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X