Super Rugby 2017

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,056
Wouldn't it make sense then for Kings-Stormers, Sharks-Cheetahs, Bulls-lions to join together just because of geography?

You go by provinces, like Mallet suggested,

Mallett has proposed that the country be divided into four regions with Gauteng (Bulls and Lions), KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape (Kings and Cheetahs) and Western Cape making up the four South African franchises.

“I personally think Port Elizabeth needs a franchise,” Mallett said. “Whether you structure it as the Kings or whether you say it is an Eastern Cape franchise and we also have Gauteng, KZN and Western Cape franchises.

which greatly depends where players are developed. The smaller unions outside will need to unite with the larger unions. The WPRU and Boland alone are a large unit. As you can see Mallet’s suggestion that PE needs a Super Rugby presence, and since they are also developing players, it is viable.

Optimally SARU will need to look at,

Gauteng,
KwaZulu-Natal,
Free State,
Eastern Cape, and
Western Cape

as separate entities in a preeminent competition, unite the smaller unions within their provinces and ally those outside these provinces to develop where short. Pumas can supply the Sharks, Griquas can supply the Cheetahs and so on, as long as they are being developed. Now that SARU is looking at promoting the two relegated Super Rugby teams to a possible European competition in 2019, think how many players can be retained under such a structure within SA. Private ownership in the commercial arms will also largely contribute, if it is managed correctly.

Provincial competitions will also become more grass rooted. Remember, when you look at your larger unions, remember from where the players were recruited from. SA Rugby needs a better return on their investment, and this is a solution.

...and for vark sakes, the unions need to look better after club rugby, quality are produced there too, not only at university.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,056
http://www.sport24.co.za/Rugby/SuperRugby/backline-reshuffle-from-jaguares-20170504

Backline reshuffle from Jaguares

Teams:

Jaguares:

15 Joaquín Tuculet, 14 Santiago Cordero, 13 Matias Orlando, 12 Santiago González Iglesias, 11 Emiliano Boffelli, 10 Juan Martín Hernández, 9 Felipe Ezcurra, 8 Leonardo Senatore, 7 Rodrigo Baez, 6 Tomás Lezana, 5 Marcos Kremer, 4 Guido Petti, 3 Ramiro Herrera, 2 Agustín Creevy, 1 Santiago Garcia Botta

Substitutes: 16 Roberto Tejerizo, 17 Lucas Noguera Paz, 18 Enrique Pieretto Heilan, 19 Matías Alemanno, 20 Juan Manuel Leguizamón, 21 Martín Landajo, 22 Nicolás Sánchez, 23 Matias Moroni

Sunwolves:

TBA

Jaguares making sure to take the victory, no easiness on their playmakers. Pending on the Sunwolves team, their backline selection, I think that the Japanese may have a chance. Fullback and wingers are the Sunwolves stumble block with the limited depth which travelled to Argentina.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,056
Sunwolves has selected a good team, don't how well they will do in Buenos Aires.

C_BWlZXUMAALBme.jpg

It has the depth, and they play on the rotation to ensure continuity on the 60min mark. I think that this will be a close call.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Actually, the Stormers are playing the basics of rugby (set piece, goal kicking etc.) better at the moment. Also better discipline.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,056
I wonder if part of it is because they didn't really have to work at their tries. Miracle kicks from Barrett, not the hard stuff that makes you work for it.
It may very well be, but the Canes need to land their conversions, it is too much pressure.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Last 10 minutes went completely against the flow. Hurricanes coach won't be too happy. Scrums were bad, lineouts were bad, goal kicking was atrocious.
 
Top