Surtie Inheritance Scam

real_name_hidden said:
I’ve been watching this thread for more than three years now. During that time, you’ve been part of a group that has been trolling others who don’t have the capacity to stand up to you.

Now that you’re faced with someone who can, you tuck your tail between your legs and run? Name calling won’t hide the fact that what you thought is a sound argument has been disproved. Today, I’ve seen you dodge and evade questions that challenged your stance. You have not provided a single iota of well, ANYTHING that substantiated your argument.

Earlier today, someone on here mentioned the term ‘keyboard warrior’ to refer to one of your counterparts.

The truth is, you’re not much of a warrior, are you? Just packing it in and hightailing it at the first sign of a real confrontation.

Just because YOU are done with this, it doesn’t mean that the argument has been settled.

If this guy is who I think it is, he’s probably laughing his head off at your ducking and diving. I know that I am
Click to expand...

Yet you only joined myBB a month ago?

I didn't run anywhere, I simply elected to stop engaging with dishonest scammers who have no conscience nor desire to do good. Anyone who advocates in favour of a scam has very, very little respect in my book.

Contrary to your argument nothing has been disproved. That is my whole point. All the promoters need to do is post the relevant court documents (which are public by their very nature) and all will be settled yet they refuse to do so. They say they've seen the documents but aren't allowed sharing them, but that is clearly a lie as court documents are public. That's the whole point of an open court system.

I've never dodged or evaded a single question, this is simply more diversion from you. The dodging and evasion is happening by those promoting the scam.

The simple fact of the matter is that there is zero chance of anyone who has put any money into this "project" of getting a single cent back. And anyone who continues to defend / attempt to give credibility / promote this scheme deserves to be shunned.
 
Francois5141 said:
Like i said. Collecting info.
Don't even waist your energy on these clowns..
Click to expand...
No, we are simply disproving the investment scam and not allowing any form of legitimacy to be attached via this forum.

Investment mandates or GTFO.
 
@Bewlen

These are the court annexures that supposedly prove the claim that there are trillions in a bank account and it all belongs to the Surtie estate.
 
real_name_hidden said:
I don’t think he’s trying to evade anything. I understand his point. If the people on this forum want to see this evidence, and it’s as freely available as that other bloke makes it out to be, then why doesn’t he just get it himself?

Implying that someone is in on what you call a scam just because his opinion differs from yours is not a fair comment to make either
Click to expand...
He says the info is available, but it is not.

It is not a matter of opinion. He is muddying the waters in an attempt at legitimacy with this scam. Again, my suspicion is that this thread is making life hard for the scammers who are still collecting money with these stories, and he is one of the scammers.

Investment mandates or GTFO.
 
Eti1 said:
@Bewlen

These are the court annexures that supposedly prove the claim that there are trillions in a bank account and it all belongs to the Surtie estate.
Click to expand...
No one is disputing that Koorbanally is attempting to claim these funds (whether he'll be successful or not is another question). The scam is that people are collecting funds, supposedly on behalf of Koorbanally, and that such contributers will then receive a portion of any funds received (in the highly unlikely case that he wins). Even if he is successful in his claim, the money isn't going to be distributed to others.
 
Eti1 said:
@Bewlen

These are the court annexures that supposedly prove the claim that there are trillions in a bank account and it all belongs to the Surtie estate.
Click to expand...
How does it prove a bank account with trillions? Page number?

Interesting dump, what you posted here is probably the scam's "prospectus".
 
Last edited:
Speedster said:
No one is disputing that Koorbanally is attempting to claim these funds (whether he'll be successful or not is another question). The scam is that people are collecting funds, supposedly on behalf of Koorbanally, and that such contributers will then receive a portion of any funds received (in the highly unlikely case that he wins). Even if he is successful in his claim, the money isn't going to be distributed to others.
Click to expand...

Sure. But the claim itself is supported by mishmash as you so eloquently put it. So it’s gonna fail because the entire thing is a scam. Regardless of investment mandates that may or may not exist.
 
Eti1 said:
Sure. But the claim itself is supported by mishmash as you so eloquently put it. So it’s gonna fail because the entire thing is a scam. Regardless of investment mandates that may or may not exist.
Click to expand...
This and the "fake fake proof" I posted earlier among other things

And look1683360189264.png Mr Blaauw the infamous NETSTAT hacker makes his appearance
 
Eti1 said:
View attachment 1519839
Click to expand...
Take-away points of interest to me:
1 Only Ms Surtie has legal claim to the monies.
2. Mr Koorbanally is to receive payment for services rendered if/when the monies are finally chiselled out of whomever.
3. Mr Koorbanally mentions his "team". Presumably he and these people have agreements as to remuneration.
4. I infer that there was money derived from the inheritance amount in the bonds etc paid into the ABSA accounts seized by the Sheriff of the Court as a result of the Gauteng High Court judgement. The reason for this case being brought would therefore seem to me to be less as a means of substantiating the primary case but to determine payments made to a party other than the executrix of the estate.

The questions that I have asked a number of times still remain to be answered: What legal claim do any of the promoters of donation schemes have to anything? No-one has produced anything concrete to support claims. Following from this, what legally enforceable claims do donors have on the "fundraisers" to whom they gave money? It here that I believe scams are being perpetrated.
 
This is primarily an IT related message board.

I’ve been in IT for around 30 years if you count from when I fixed PCs for pocket money.

That “evidence” they provided is the result of someone googling “hacking terms”, “hacking tools”, and maybe “hacking vulnerabilities” (for the open ports). Word salad.

I’m willing to testify to that in court.
 
dabean said:
This is primarily an IT related message board.

I’ve been in IT for around 30 years if you count from when I fixed PCs for pocket money.

That “evidence” they provided is the result of someone googling “hacking terms”, “hacking tools”, and maybe “hacking vulnerabilities” (for the open ports). Word salad.

I’m willing to testify to that in court.
Click to expand...
Your last sentence encapsulates one of the most nebulous omitted areas of question and investigation: Why have the pieces of "evidence" and especially the sources named in the various affadavits not been examined in court and under oath? Specific people in ABSA, PIC and experts are named. They have not been examined in any court proceedings yet. So all that is presented are affidavits and certified copies of documents but these are only the materials needed in the discovery phase. Determining the substance needs far more rigour than this.
 
I do appreciate Nobody being a pressing buffoon,it motivated me to dig out **** I haven't bothered to look at in years,and it was just the hilarious break I needed from day-to-day since all the good scams already collapsed,even Tariomix is limping like a guy with his balls cut off
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter