South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I had a Siemens Stylistic Tablet-PC about 7 years ago...
Its Sucked then.... and I dont see any change.
The Difference now is APPLE say its 'Cool' - so all the fanbois are going to wild. Just like the phone and MP3 player.
The HP Slate was underwhelming, to say the least. Hailed by Ballmer as "something that's almost as portable as a phone and that's as powerful as a PC running Windows 7", the demonstration showed a flat panel computing device that seemed more equivalent to a color Kindle than to a Windows 7 wonder-tablet.
When January 27 rolls around and Apple holds its rumored press conference about its alleged tablet...I mean slate PC, which may or may not be called the "iSlate", it won't have to do much to impress and awe. If the mythic "iSlate" is half of what it is rumored to be, it will still be twice what Microsoft and HP unveiled.
Very sparse article, looks like it was sponsored by Foxconn. No talk about the tablet PC’s Pegatron is making/launching. No talk about the Nvidia tablet (I think Quanta Computer is making it), no mention of the Joo Joo which is already on pre-order. But unconfirmed vaporware like the iSlate and the fabled Dell Android tablet with “No official release date has been given” is mentioned.
7 years ago that Tablet would not have Multi-Touch, would be heavy, have a low res display and have no video to play back - the processor would have been weak and the battery life dismal.
It was a 1Ghz CPU, 1024x800 screen resolution, 40GB HDD and 8hrs battery life and played Video just find- I got rid of it as it was not practical. No Multitouch, but do you propose to use that when one hand is holding the thing
![]()
Apple's tablet will probably be very small and thin, powered by new ARM cores or Tegra 2 or whatever and run an OS which is more sophisticated than iPhone OS.
It will be like 8 inches or so - I reckon, large enough to do cool stuff on and small enough to be truly portable.
That's a fine resolution for a screen from 7 years ago.
A 1GHz CPU won't cut it for H264 video nowadays. Even xvid video will have issues. Now with HD 1280by720 videos in H.264 you need a tough processor or you need a GPU or something like Tegra. In 2002 they didn't have these technologies and videos were 320by200 DiVX at most and not popular. Flash is also CPU intensive as GPUs don't offload it. With Youtube, Vuzu, CrunchyRoll and other Flash based video solutions people will now want power and there is content to play back. There are also 3G networks and more WiFi hotspots than in 2002.
Don't forget the new SSD/flash memory technology. With a HDD you had to be very careful but with flash/SSD you can go on a trampoline with the computer.
Multitouch is nice, not for 2 hands, but for finger gestures. You can also rest the slate/tablet on your laptop or tabletop but yeah it can be cumbersome hence it has to be thin and light. That is a requirement and if they can make it drop resistant and good durability, it will be even better. 700g of joy in under 1cm with 1280by1024 or better resolution with onboard ATI/NVidia graphics and C2D ULV. Ideally the thing has to be fanless.