Telkom’s CEO problems: A retrospective

sick

A sign of a poor leadership and a sick company.
 
it was all good and well for Telkom, while Nxasana was at the helm, all good except not for the public. this was the time when that bastard Nxasana hiked up everything at the cost of the country, whilst the government was coining it as well.
luckily, Telkom's now paying the price for this, major loss in revenue after a major gain in revenue (should have kept it cheaper during that time, would have equated in less lines being dropped)

i hate telkom, i hope it goes worse.
 
The answer was given to me... By who? A secret special agent 021! :)

When you employ top executives, such as Hedberg and Peter Nelson (ex-CFO), you have to allow them free reign to implement their strategies.

Remember that these guys are normally employed for a contracted period and their remuneration depends largely on results. Hence they will want to have the final say on all strategies and the implementation thereof.

All Telkom's strategies have to be approved by their Board of Directors (BoD), which includes the CEO and the CFO. *_BUT_* the chairman of the BoD is appointed by the government as they are the majority shareholder and, via their Class A shareholding, the chairman has a golden vote. This effectively allows the chairman to veto any decision.

Jeffrey Hedberg is the right person for the CEO job, but he refuses to be a puppet with the chairman pulling the strings.

For Telkom to remain profitable they need to increase productivity to generate revenue and increase efficiency to cut costs.

To achieve either of these objectives some tough decisions need to be made. Obviously Hedberg has sounded out the BoD and they have must have rejected his proposals, one of which is to reduce personnel.

From a political perspective retrenchments in an Election year is a huge no-no! Staff costs make up a substantial portion of Telkom's total operational cost. So how else can he cut costs without impacting on productivity and efficiency??? To complicate it even more, the unions are demanding double digit salary increases.

Another thorny issue is Hedberg's vision to first sort out the South African based operations before heading into Africa. This is in direct contrast to the government's wishes.

Recently there has been noises emanating from the Minister of Communications office that they want to revise the Class A shareholding and extend the effective period of the "golden vote". This is a threat to Telkom's ability to operate independently.

So the question Hedberg must have asked himself was "As a person of integrity, can I apply for the CEO position knowing that it is doomed to fail and just turn a blind eye and milk it for as much as I can?".

We now all know the answer to that.

Thanks Special Agent 021! :)
 
Why do the CEO's keep leaving?!?

Is there a someone here who can have a insight?

TechCentral's Duncan McLeod was in conversation with Bruce Whitfield on 702 the other night. Sounds like the 40% ANC/government stake in Telkom is more than likely a contributing factor. Hedberg is looking to make some strategic changes in Telkom, to improve profitability it would require some staff lay-off's. I think his ideas are too bold for the ruling party. Hedberg was possibly the thing for Telkom, for us and for the country.

Imho, it comes back to the nationalisation rhetoric we keep hearing from the ANC's mouthpiece, Mal-ema. They just cannot get over the idea of allowing the country to prosper without their constant meddling. This rhetoric will affect investor confidence and ultimately our credit rating (through the likes of Moody and S&P). It makes our international loans (like those for Eskom) more expensive. The public carries the brunt of it (ultimately).
 
TechCentral's Duncan McLeod was in conversation with Bruce Whitfield on 702 the other night. Sounds like the 40% ANC/government stake in Telkom is more than likely a contributing factor. Hedberg is looking to make some strategic changes in Telkom, to improve profitability it would require some staff lay-off's. I think his ideas are too bold for the ruling party. Hedberg was possibly the thing for Telkom, for us and for the country.

Imho, it comes back to the nationalisation rhetoric we keep hearing from the ANC's mouthpiece, Mal-ema. They just cannot get over the idea of allowing the country to prosper without their constant meddling. This rhetoric will affect investor confidence and ultimately our credit rating (through the likes of Moody and S&P). It makes our international loans (like those for Eskom) more expensive. The public carries the brunt of it (ultimately).

we need a change of government...people stop voting out of loyalty towards our socialist/terrorist leadership!
 
pity Jeffrey, good or bad decision, Telkom and SA heading downhill because of poor governance.
 
Sneaky

Perhaps they are pushing the share price down on purpose

Buy them dirt cheap -- sell to the Chinese -- and watch them go up by a factor of ten

Then sell and make a killing ( Who gives a toss about normal South Africans )

:confused:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X