Dreadlock_tales
Active Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2015
- Messages
- 65
Not possible for the next 2 years at least. I'd say start it at R500 for 100GB with 1Mb throttle thereafter, going down to 128Kb after 150GB. You will not curb abuse without it.Uncapped LTE with 100gb soft cap - R299 (Throttled to 2Mbps)
Uncapped LTE with 200gb soft cap - R499 (Throttled to 4Mbps)
Uncapped LTE with 300gb soft cap - R699 (Throttled to 4Mbps)
Uncapped LTE with 400gb soft cap - R799 (Throttled to 4Mbps)
Uncapped LTE with 500gb soft cap - R899 (Throttled to 4Mbps)
Uncapped LTE with 1TB soft cap - R1499 (Throttled to 10Mbps)
The poll options are broken - there's no 400 - 450GB option. That'd be my sweet spot; a tad higher than my highest historical usage, with enough headroom to cover eventualities. I likely wouldn't come close most months, but I might want to in others.
Not possible for the next 2 years at least. I'd say start it at R500 for 100GB with 1Mb throttle thereafter, going down to 128Kb after 150GB. You will not curb abuse without it.
Two options actually missing - 300-350GB and 400-450GB.
Network profitability isn't a product of the per gigabyte cost of some users on one package provisioned on that network. Why should customers be responsible for interrogating the financial or infrastructural sustainability of an ISP's offer? That it was done poorly does not necessarily mean it should never have been done at all.Do you really think networks can run profitably at R1 a GB?
You pays your moneys and you takes your choice. If 30GB works for you and you're satisfied with the price point what would it matter to you?And what do you suggest happens to the hundreds of thousands of capped LTE subscribers like myself who are paying R499 for 30GB and all the other data bundle sizes?
Do you really think networks can run profitably at R1 a GB?
And what do you suggest happens to the hundreds of thousands of capped LTE subscribers like myself who are paying R499 for 30GB and all the other data bundle sizes?
Any feed back from this?
So the majority of you, 70% believe it must be between 250gb and 500gb. If we work out the average, it should be +-375GB which i feel is fair.
Then the next poll should probably be a Yes/No "Throttling" poll.
I would say unthrottled until 350GB
350GB Throttled to 10mbps
400GB - 6mbps
450gb - 3mbps
500gb - 1mbps
550GB - 256k
So the majority of you, 70% believe it must be between 250gb and 500gb. If we work out the average, it should be +-375GB which i feel is fair.
Then the next poll should probably be a Yes/No "Throttling" poll.
I would say unthrottled until 350GB
350GB Throttled to 10mbps
400GB - 6mbps
450gb - 3mbps
500gb - 1mbps
550GB - 256k
Sheesh, give it some time.
She's committed to a proper response, but has a full programme today according to her. Which is fair enough.
I'm still fuming at the idea that we have to compromise on a signed, binding contract...
But anyway, if they have to throttle, start at 20mbps, not 10
Then, another question- all this talk on how much bandwidth netflix uses per stream- is this for a 1080p stream? What about users who have 4k capability? I'm sure there are some of those amongst us?
If I had it my way, unthrottled till 500GB, but going with your solution, unthrottled to 350GB,
350GB to 500GB throttled to 40Mbps
500GB to 800GB throttled to 20Mbps
800GB to 1TB throttled to 10Mbps
1TB+ throttled to 5Mbps.
Oh and no upload throttling under 5Mbps on any of the packages.
That would make me okay to continue using this "new" product.
I have never even come close to 1TB, but I do have 11TB of NAS space at home waiting to be backed up to the cloud...![]()