What I find funny about this is that Telkom have (for years) been whining about how their networks can't handle the strain of giving everyone "uncapped" or even reasonable caps (75GBs at least, thankyouverymuch) and claiming that no legitimate user need more than 3GBs (I lol @ paying R800 for a 4meg line and a 3GB cap to check e-mails and lotto numbers).
It has always depressed me how Telkom can sell bandwidth off as usage since, if their networks were under such strain, then why not sell lower bandwidth instead of capping since bandwidth is what Telkom gets from SAT3, not "usage?" Oh, wait, this is Telkom we're talking about - capping helps them extort us
I've come to realise something. We - the "power users" - the ones who know where to find what we want, how to get what we want, are the ones who bring Telkom and other ISPs the most money. And our usage has absolutely NOTHING to do with them. If we want to download series, games, movies, videos or whatever else, that is OUR concern. Telkom's prerogative should be getting broadband out there, not financially victimising us with roflage concepts like "caps." "Local" usage is a joke. "Blended" usage is a joke.
I believe that Telkom has either deliberately, or inadvertently proven to us in the last couple of days that it has the means to give people uncapped internet, that people
want and
will use it if they have it at affordable prices (R800 is "fine" in my books considering the current extortion.)
I've been downloading Ubuntu ISOs and updates at steady 4mbps speeds - so there is very, very little "impact" if anything, on their network at all. I don't believe that Telkom has a legitimate excuse to **** us around any more.