FiestaST
Honorary Master
Relatively speaking the Polo Vivo is not at all crap; in the long term; relative to the entry-level (cheap) Koreans. It's the better engineered car ito of durability. Boring & pricey for what it is but more long lasting.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Relatively speaking the Polo Vivo is not at all crap; in the long term; relative to the entry-level (cheap) Koreans. It's the better engineered car ito of durability. Boring & pricey for what it is but more long lasting.
Astra G? They go far but the interior does begin to show wear at 150,000, thankfully it is cheap to fix/improve. I hope my Astra H lasts as long.Astra 2004 model, lots of gravel road driving, 350 000 kms, still driving as day one.
Other good thing about the Vivo is that it does not develop rattles as the mileage clocks up. It comes standard with rattles.Relatively speaking the Polo Vivo is not at all crap; in the long term; relative to the entry-level (cheap) Koreans. It's the better engineered car ito of durability. Boring & pricey for what it is but more long lasting.
you do 50000km a year?:wtf: do you live in your car?
The 2011 Hyundai i20... I had the unfortunate pleasure of driving for a period of 3 months had the dash rattling on every bump and a very rough engine - this at 70,000km.
Drove a 2014 Picanto for a month, a 2013 1.6 Accent for 2 weeks - skittish at 100km/h on the freeway... all horrible. Cheap plastic through and through. The Polo Vivo may be complete crap, but hell, its drive is a million times better.
My 1999 Hyundai Accent mentioned earlier just hit 460k this morning.
Impressive. Any major failures experienced ?