The Brexit Thread

Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,697
Oh so Leave lied and the Remoaners told the truth. Remoaners warned that this would happen.

Yeah, the best thing about Brexit is how pragmatic realism had smashed the Leave Campaigns rainbow fantasies.

Here is the leave campaign promises -

5e0497da8b490e659baf8a16d9418a94.jpg

What? It's clear most Brexiteers want to diverge, it's clearly absurd for the EU to insist on a "level playing field" (aka "follow all EU regulations which the UK does not have a say in") when the UK is out of the EU! Literally one of the big reasons to vote to leave is to diverge. Like, duh. I know TMay's deal insisted on a level playing field (but she was a Remoaner so what do you expect?) but thankfully Boris is now the PM and insisting on something quite different.
 

C4Cat

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
14,307
Farage's job was to get Brexit done. The UK got their money's worth. He did an excellent job. Quality workmanship and enjoyable to boot. He even threw in some salt mining for free. Will recommend .
I wouldn't say an excellent job, they missed the deadline, took longer to do, cost more than expected and still nobody knows what sort of deal they're getting. Wouldn't recommend :thumbsdown:
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
What? It's clear most Brexiteers want to diverge, it's clearly absurd for the EU to insist on a "level playing field" (aka "follow all EU regulations which the UK does not have a say in") when the UK is out of the EU! Literally one of the big reasons to vote to leave is to diverge. Like, duh. I know TMay's deal insisted on a level playing field (but she was a Remoaner so what do you expect?) but thankfully Boris is now the PM and insisting on something quite different.
What is clear is that Brexiters did not want to diverge during their campaigns leading up to the referendum.

Now they are just shifting the goalposts to align with their BS.

Why is it absurd to insist on matters to protect the interests of the members of the Union.

The reasons are clear and justified.

The reality is the EU have the advantage in the negotiations.
 

AlmightyBender

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
7,249
What? It's clear most Brexiteers want to diverge, it's clearly absurd for the EU to insist on a "level playing field" (aka "follow all EU regulations which the UK does not have a say in") when the UK is out of the EU! Literally one of the big reasons to vote to leave is to diverge. Like, duh. I know TMay's deal insisted on a level playing field (but she was a Remoaner so what do you expect?) but thankfully Boris is now the PM and insisting on something quite different.
Dude, you do realize that that is exactly how anyone trading with the EU that is not in the EU is treated? I.e. here are the rules you follow, else p!ss off.

How do they achieve such a strong position? Collective bargaining power from being in a.... union.

That you keep thinking that they are now on a level playing field is sad. Same with USA vs UK. The US is in much stronger position to dictate terms due to the size of their economy.

But wishing you all the best in the negotiations!
 

MidnightWizard

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
5,720
I see Johnson's boss Cummings is now dictating who can attend a briefing and who can't? Absolutely disgraceful behaviour and Johnson seems content to go along with it. No wonder he is compared to Trump, but at least Trump has the back bone to do it himself and not hide behind that scruffy little cnut.

And I thought Corbyn was the communist?

Winston Churchill ALSO had a "Cummings"

Brendan Rendall Bracken

Churchill's closest confidant was a secretive self-hating Irish immigrant

So too did Woodrow Wilson

Colonel House and Woodrow Wilson: Paving the Way for War

Colonel House: A Biography of Woodrow Wilson’s Silent Partner

ALL these people in top positions of power have "MINDERS"
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Dude, you do realize that that is exactly how anyone trading with the EU that is not in the EU is treated? I.e. here are the rules you follow, else p!ss off.

How do they achieve such a strong position? Collective bargaining power from being in a.... union.

That you keep thinking that they are now on a level playing field is sad. Same with USA vs UK. The US is in much stronger position to dictate terms due to the size of their economy.

But wishing you all the best in the negotiations!

Chris is still stuck in the delusion that the UK is an empire that will be able to dictate to the world how things go.

Remarkable how much of Brexiteer bluster is based on this delusion.

 
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,697
Chris is still stuck in the delusion that the UK is an empire that will be able to dictate to the world how things go.

Remarkable how much of Brexiteer bluster is based on this delusion.


Weird...despite Remoaners' obsession about Brexiteers being nostalgic for the Empire (most people who voted in the EU referendum were either born in the dying days of the Empire or when there was no empire), it's the EU that constantly talks about the empire (https://unherd.com/2019/05/will-the-eu-become-an-empire/ , https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2019...-is-a-liberal-empire-and-it-is-about-to-fall/ , https://uk.ambafrance.org/Europe-must-become-a-peaceful-empire-says-Minister)
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,697
The Department of International Trade is opening a consultation for 'free ports':
FYI: What’s a free port, and does the EU have them?

Typically, when goods enter a country, they have to follow the import regulations of that country. This often involves a tariff—a tax on those imports.

A free port or “free zone” is an area that is inside the geographic boundary of a country, but which is legally considered outside the country for customs purposes. Goods brought into the free port don’t face import tariffs (though if they are then sent into the rest of the country for sale, they are then taxed accordingly).

Sometimes businesses operating within free ports receive other incentives, such as tax breaks. For example the Canary Islands Free Zone has a corporate tax rate of 4% compared to 25% in the rest of Spain.

There are various economic benefits to free ports outlined in a paper authored by Mr Sunak in 2016. Conversely there have been criticisms of free ports that they can be used by organisations to launder money and avoid tax.

:cool:
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
A Conservative minister personally lobbied the Bahraini royal family to give a multi-billion dollar oil contract to a company under investigation for suspected bribery and money laundering.

The intervention from Liam Fox, who was international trade secretary at the time, was one of several attempts by senior Conservatives to help Petrofac, which is headed by a major Tory party donor, to secure the $5bn contract.
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
Categorical, definitive proof that the so called fear campaign from Remainers was accurate and called it, as it would be.

Proof that the leave campaign was built up of lies and fairy tales.

Good bye frictionless trade, hello regulatory checks, additional paperwork and and and.

I thought Brexit was meant to break free from the EU beauracrecy? Seems like it was all about making it more beauracratic, adding additional trade barriers, reducing free market capitalism. For what?

 
Top