The Brexit Thread

Gtx Gaming

Gtx Gaming
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
25,510
Good friday agreement might be at risk?
b57b4bebf5d4d4513861b7573d7fd957.jpg
 

f2wohf

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
15,157
Good friday agreement might be at risk?
b57b4bebf5d4d4513861b7573d7fd957.jpg

I’m sure the ETA and the Corsicans have enough weapons hidden to give a hand to the IRA in case they need it.

Now the real interrogation, what will be the custom duty on this?
 
Last edited:

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,567

The politicians still don't know what they're doing.

Just for a start, it would appear they need the consent of the Republic of Ireland to leave the ECHR, as it's a term of the Agreement (or bring in N-Irish specific legislation (which May's power brokers in the DUP won't allow).

The British Government will complete incorporation into Northern Ireland law of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), with direct access to the courts, and remedies for breach of the Convention, including power for the courts to overrule Assembly legislation on grounds of inconsistency.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/136652/agreement.pdf

https://www.ft.com/content/34a22284-0ff3-36a7-9e33-c010bbb2cd23
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Really? Reality is, they can and will do as they please. No amount of whining will stop them.

Fascinating. Is this how you think countries should function? Party X wins an election - everyone else should shut up, stop whining and let Party X do what they want because they won?
 
Last edited:

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,916
Fascinating. Is this how you think countries should function? Party X wins an election - everyone else should shut up, stop whining and let Party X do what they want because they won?

There is ample evidence to show he likes himself a good dosage of authoritarianism. An opponent lays out an argument and he simply labels it as whining, the height of lazy intellectual reasoning. We all know he probably doesn't feel the same way about say the tea party protests.

Its funny though because hes essentially nailed himself to a post, any criticism of a ruling party i come across from him will be duly noted and pointed out. Perhaps at that point the propaganda wall hes erected around his logic and reasoning will be broken through somewhat.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
There is ample evidence to show he likes himself a good dosage of authoritarianism. An opponent lays out an argument and he simply labels it as whining, the height of lazy intellectual reasoning. We all know he probably doesn't feel the same way about say the tea party protests.

Its funny though because hes essentially nailed himself to a post, any criticism of a ruling party i come across from him will be duly noted and pointed out. Perhaps at that point the propaganda wall hes erected around his logic and reasoning will be broken through somewhat.

I suspect consistency is a bit of a pipe dream here. :)
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,700
Not very surprising, of course.

Draft Starmer press release showing that Labour is working with Brussels

Guido can reveal the existence of a draft Keir Starmer press release that shows Labour has been working with Brussels on Brexit policy. The draft press release, which was written after Corbyn’s speech last week, would have boasted how Labour had “secured EU backing” for their customs union proposal. The statement would have said “it is understood” that the European Parliament’s Brexit Steering Group was set to “adapt its resolution to reflect the wording of Jeremy Corbyn’s customs union policy”. The press release was never sent but it has been leaked to Guido…

Labour secure EU backing for customs union proposal

Brussels officials have given their backing to Labour’s proposal for a new UK-EU comprehensive customs union.

Keir Starmer, Labour’s Shadow Brexit spokesperson, visited Brussels this week following Jeremy Corbyn’s speech in Coventry in Monday.

On Wednesday, Michel Barnier told journalists Corbyn’s proposal to keep UK in a customs union “offers a significant part of the solution for Ireland.”

Later this month the European Parliament is expected to adopt a resolution setting out its demands for the next phase of Brexit negotiations.

It is understood that following the Labour’s leader’s speech the Brexit Steering Group will adapt its resolution to reflect the wording of Jeremy Corbyn’s customs union policy – particularly proposals for a “comprehensive” customs union.

The backing of Corbyn’s Brexit stance from the EU Commission and Parliament will heap pressure on the Prime Minister to provide a credible solution to the border in Northern Ireland.


Why was Labour so keen to “secure EU backing” for their customs union policy? How and when did they secure this backing? How was it “understood” that the European Parliament was set to back their policy? Why was the press release never sent? Was it ditched after media speculation about Labour colluding with the EU? This appears to be evidence that Labour has been working with Brussels to undermine the UK negotiating position…
 
Last edited:

Pitbull

Verboten
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
64,307
Fascinating. Is this how you think countries should function? Party X wins an election - everyone else should shut up, stop whining and let Party X do what they want because they won?

Never claimed that is how it should function :confused:

That is the reality, so either deal with the situation of GTFO. No amount of whining or crying will change the situation. But that is too higher grade for you to understand I guess.
 

Pitbull

Verboten
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
64,307
There is ample evidence to show he likes himself a good dosage of authoritarianism. An opponent lays out an argument and he simply labels it as whining, the height of lazy intellectual reasoning. We all know he probably doesn't feel the same way about say the tea party protests.

Its funny though because hes essentially nailed himself to a post, any criticism of a ruling party i come across from him will be duly noted and pointed out. Perhaps at that point the propaganda wall hes erected around his logic and reasoning will be broken through somewhat.

I recall me and you having a discussion and you disappeared. You now back to ride on ODs tail? (He's a big boy, doesn't need your support :p) Maybe go back to the discussion you and I had and answer that instead...
 
Last edited:

Xarog

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
19,039
This is good, if true, while May is floundering and going nowhere, at least labour is moving forward with these negotiations.
Yes, Labour should definitely take their cues from the other side that's trying to get as much out of the deal as possible. :rolleyes:
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Never claimed that is how it should function :confused:

That is the reality, so either deal with the situation of GTFO. No amount of whining or crying will change the situation. But that is too higher grade for you to understand I guess.

So... That's a yes, then?
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
This is good, if true, while May is floundering and going nowhere, at least labour is moving forward with these negotiations.
In what universe is it a good thing to actively circumvent official negotiations to further your deluded agenda?!? They have no mandate or authority and cannot commit to anything tangible anyway.

It is essentially treason, are we applauding treason now? :wtf:
 

Xarog

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
19,039
In what universe is it a good thing to actively circumvent official negotiations to further your deluded agenda?!? They have no mandate or authority and cannot commit to anything tangible anyway.

It is essentially treason, are we applauding treason now? :wtf:

Did you see this one? :

Nobody said he should put the interests ahead of the UK ahead of the EU. But there is a difference between favouring the EU and bargaining along those lines, and favouring the EU such that you pretend to negotiate an equitable exit while doing everything in your power to subvert the entire process because you think the EU is better off being a monolithic entity that gets to dictate to the puny Brits what's what.

Whatever... he represents the EU and is on the opposing side of the negotiating table to the UK - the UK's interests are not his concern...
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Is there any reason a random blog's claims should be considered credible on this?

The comments section is filled with deranged loons it seems.
 
Top