Pitbull
Verboten
"Trade deals take many years to establish"
SA signs a post-Brexit agreement with UK
SA signs a post-Brexit agreement with UK
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
UK wants Brexit to become independent from the EU and have control of their own trade agreements."Trade deals take many years to establish"
SA signs a post-Brexit agreement with UK
Lol, you'll just find a problem with anything.UK wants Brexit to become independent from the EU and have control of their own trade agreements.
Signs trade agreements with SA (and other countries) that exactly mirror the trade conditions these nations currently enjoy with the EU.
UK wants Brexit to become independent from the EU and have control of their own trade agreements.
Signs trade agreements with SA (and other countries) that exactly mirror the trade conditions these nations currently enjoy with the EU.
Lol, you'll just find a problem with anything.
Proof that it is the same as the EU agreements with SA?
And then that's not the point of Brexit to sign new trade agreements with countries outside the EU. The point is to divorce from the EU.
Because not having an agreement in place would hurt SA more than Britain. So this probably more due to the most restarted government than anything elseThey, yes THEY made it out to be such a massive thing to negotiate new trade deals and and and. Then the must retarded Government probably in the world closes a deal with the UK even before Brexit![]()
So why again do you need to pay the EU large sums of money to do this?UK wants Brexit to become independent from the EU and have control of their own trade agreements.
Signs trade agreements with SA (and other countries) that exactly mirror the trade conditions these nations currently enjoy with the EU.
Follow the money and you are bound to find a lying, cheating Tory.
"Trade deals take many years to establish"
SA signs a post-Brexit agreement with UK
It is actually just problematic with an unequal trading partner. Where they try and work in some protectionism for British industry, because we have(are supposed to have)cheap labour...Three years is many years and thats with an unequal trading partner.
Shame...you need to stop spreading fake news/poppy cock grand conspiracies:
It is actually just problematic with an unequal trading partner. Where they try and work in some protectionism for British industry, because we have(are supposed to have)cheap labour...
With two eqaul partners it is much easier as there isn't any balancing required.
Three years is many years and thats with an unequal trading partner.
It wasn't 3 years of actual negotiations and working on the plan.In this case it isnt as problematic, its just the same deal as before and it still took three years. In the case of European trading partners its going to be far harder as for starters you cant use the same deal.
2 years,
And yes, that is what happens if you do the work when this was voted for and not sit and hope Brexit will not be a reality. The Leftists have given the public false hope and now it's a shyte show because of it...
It wasn't 3 years of actual negotiations and working on the plan.
I think the bilateral trade sits at around £7 billion. So peanuts.3 years and the rest is besides the point as per your initial proclamation. If it takes 3 years to negotiate an unchanged deal with Southern Africa, how long is it going to take with the rest of Europe? In fact this point you tried to make does the opposite of what you think it does.
If you only start running 2 seconds after the gun has gone off its still time counted.
Legal action begins against Boris Johnson forcing through no-deal Brexit
Pro-EU QCs Joanna Cherry MP and Jo Maugham will ask judges to fine or imprison the Prime Minister if he ignores a new Act of Parliament passed by MPs this week.
The Act demands he sends a letter asking the EU to delay Brexit by three months, beyond October 31, if there’s no consensus by the middle of next month.
Yet Mr Johnson has claimed he will still leave on October 31, with ministers suggesting he will “test the limits” of the law.
The QCs issued proceedings in Edinburgh’s Court of Session - the same court that ruled on Wednesday the Parliament suspension was unlawful.
They are calling for an "order for specific performance of [the Prime Minister's statutory] duties under the Act."
Their petition adds consequences of the failure to obey could include "fine and imprisonment" if consistent with the Act.