South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
In the absence of a fully liberalised telecoms market, Icasa is SA’s only hope of cheaper, broader and better telecoms services.
In the absence of a fully liberalised telecoms market, Icasa is SA’s only hope of cheaper, broader and better telecoms services.
almost a standard article that could have been released at any time over the last 5 years
Translation: We're screwed.![]()
In the absence of a fully liberalised telecoms market, Icasa is SA’s only hope of cheaper, broader and better telecoms services.
True, but I would place less emphasis on the "strong and independent regulator" and considerably more emphasis on "allowing robust competition" - in a highly competitive market the role of a regulator is less important.THERE is a simple reason why SA has among the world’s highest telecommunications prices: government tried to privatise a monopoly without creating a strong and independent regulator or allowing robust competition.
If we have a strong and robust regulator, like they do in Britain, then the scene is set for robust competition. I hope you're not saying the regulator in that country is unimportant, because that is simply absurd.http://www.mybroadband.co.za/nephp/?m=show&id=5102True, but I would place less emphasis on the "strong and independent regulator" and considerably more emphasis on "allowing robust competition" - in a highly competitive market the role of a regulator is less important.
I did not post that no regulation is required, I did not post that we do not need a strong and independent telecoms regulator, you're insinuations & twisting of what I did post, are highly offensive.If we have a strong and robust regulator, like they do in Britain, then the scene is set for robust competition. I hope you're not saying the regulator in that country is unimportant, because that is simply absurd.
The only people arguing for self-regulation and a weak ICASA are the monopolies and corporate giants. You know which ones I mean, one of them being the forum sponsor and conference host. Which lead me to my next point - that perhaps Myadsl needs to be strong and independent itself, accepting of criticism and robust debate, before they can make such a comment.
IncompetentCASA's ADSL Regulations [if one can call them that], once guavamint gazetted, were reason enough for me to lose all faith I once had in ICASA, IMO this incompetence not only stems from a lack of independence from the Grim Poisonous Ivyness Creeper, but is actively encouraged by the ministerial bovinity, and certainly protects Telkodemonopolies' de facto fixed line monopoly status - there have to be lots of guavamint people getting money under various tables as a result of IncompetentCASA.Perhaps another reason to support the view of Icasa incompetence and lack of capability, preventing competition and have no rugulatory backbone. They cannot decide or agree on anything, playing for time, maybe play in the hands (instructed) of the shareholders of telecoms in this country ie. Telkom and the government.
http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/telecoms/2006/0612081030.asp?S=Legal View&A=LEG&O=FRGN
You know which ones I mean, one of them being the forum sponsor and conference host. Which lead me to my next point - that perhaps Myadsl needs to be strong and independent itself, accepting of criticism and robust debate, before they can make such a comment.