The Nicholas Ninow Rape Case and Trial

Dros will be held liable due to negligence in not taking precautions that their patron or their children are safe at all times and also if the note was on their play area and it indeed said only the parent can remove the child or a staff member must accompany the child then they are grossly negligent. What in turn will happen is the restaurant will be sued for damages and future counselling and rehabiliation fees for the child. Also for all medical fees.

The aim of this would set a precedent that would aim to prevent future issues like these not repeating themself.

You may think this is hogwash as to how can it be so. But neglicence can be due to a variety of issues and it mainly aims to prevent things from repeating themself. Law would then be introduced under health and safety thus requiring changes going forward.

You didn't read the case law I posted?
 
This thread is constantly in view in terms of front forum page. What continually grates me is this "allegedly" part. Is there any doubt? Can mods just not remove this word from the title?

That's what the court of law is there for... to determine.
It's not up to us.
 
That's what the court of law is there for... to determine.
It's not up to us.

As I said/asked before - why are the rapes of black or coloured girls allowed to be called rapes before it becomes a judgement of the court?
 
Basically, more than one child minder is required.

Sooo, you're going to have a child minder escort your little one to a public restroom? Not really a better solution, unless they hire some local muscle to stand guard outside the restrooms.

My vote, swing the guy from a rope, no drop just a swing.Gravity will win in the end.
 
So I have another question, if you were this POS parent, how would you handle this? Would you support him, disown him, etc?
Unless his mental, Killed and denounce him or commit him.
 
You studied law, and think a person "if" convicted of rape, or at the very least child molestation/abuse will get a suspended sentence?

*I was seriously trying to ask this in the most civil way and without laughing
Well he said that he studied law. He didn't say that he passed anything,,,,
 
Why my posts are being deleted... ? So we are putting gags on free speech..?

Mine too!!!! And I'm not posting anything worth deleting. Not sure what's going on.

Maybe mods removing any mention of his name? Pics? Mention of Pics?
 
I should not have watched the video posted in the previous page. I feel like puking now. What a disgusting human being.
 
Reason why....
First Offence
He is under 21.

This is rape of a minor and not shoplifting. Unless someone massively bungles the case, he's going away for some time.
 
Last edited:
This thread is constantly in view in terms of front forum page. What continually grates me is this "allegedly" part. Is there any doubt? Can mods just not remove this word from the title?

What media law says about identifying the defendant
Once they have made a plea, the media can then report on the charges being faced by an individual, using their name in the process. This doesn’t allow journalists to then label the suspect a “rapist”, but they can use terms like “alleged rapist” to add context to the situation.

Getting this wrong can be devastating for those behind the publication of the information. The state needs to be able to prove a defendant has been given a fair trial – being prematurely identified and classed as a criminal before being found guilty severely jeopardises this, as legal advisor Helene Eloff explains:

“If the media paints someone as a suspect or criminal though he is never found guilty of committing a crime, he may claim remuneration from the media house involved. His right to human dignity will have been unfairly limited. A suspect’s right to a good name is protected by the law of defamation.”​
https://www.thesouthafrican.com/dros-restaurant-alleged-rapist-tweet/
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X