LazyLion
King of de Jungle
Who else thinks drugs were involved...
Specifically Tik. That kind of dutch courage usually accompanies a psychopath or a Tik addict... surely.
That's exactly what I thought it looks like.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Who else thinks drugs were involved...
Specifically Tik. That kind of dutch courage usually accompanies a psychopath or a Tik addict... surely.
Dros will be held liable due to negligence in not taking precautions that their patron or their children are safe at all times and also if the note was on their play area and it indeed said only the parent can remove the child or a staff member must accompany the child then they are grossly negligent. What in turn will happen is the restaurant will be sued for damages and future counselling and rehabiliation fees for the child. Also for all medical fees.
The aim of this would set a precedent that would aim to prevent future issues like these not repeating themself.
You may think this is hogwash as to how can it be so. But neglicence can be due to a variety of issues and it mainly aims to prevent things from repeating themself. Law would then be introduced under health and safety thus requiring changes going forward.
This thread is constantly in view in terms of front forum page. What continually grates me is this "allegedly" part. Is there any doubt? Can mods just not remove this word from the title?
Thanks for changing the rules of media coverage of the legal system.
That's what the court of law is there for... to determine.
It's not up to us.
Basically, more than one child minder is required.
Unless his mental, Killed and denounce him or commit him.So I have another question, if you were this POS parent, how would you handle this? Would you support him, disown him, etc?
Your Mandarin is impressive.Unless his mental, Killed and denounce him or commit him.
Well he said that he studied law. He didn't say that he passed anything,,,,You studied law, and think a person "if" convicted of rape, or at the very least child molestation/abuse will get a suspended sentence?
*I was seriously trying to ask this in the most civil way and without laughing
What nonsense is this? The media are not reporting on the legal system.
Why my posts are being deleted... ? So we are putting gags on free speech..?
Why my posts are being deleted... ? So we are putting gags on free speech..?
iirc, one of the original News24 articles mentioned he was also charged with drug possession.
How old are you?Reason why....
First Offence
He is under 21.
Reason why....
First Offence
He is under 21.
This thread is constantly in view in terms of front forum page. What continually grates me is this "allegedly" part. Is there any doubt? Can mods just not remove this word from the title?
What media law says about identifying the defendant
Once they have made a plea, the media can then report on the charges being faced by an individual, using their name in the process. This doesn’t allow journalists to then label the suspect a “rapist”, but they can use terms like “alleged rapist” to add context to the situation.
Getting this wrong can be devastating for those behind the publication of the information. The state needs to be able to prove a defendant has been given a fair trial – being prematurely identified and classed as a criminal before being found guilty severely jeopardises this, as legal advisor Helene Eloff explains:
“If the media paints someone as a suspect or criminal though he is never found guilty of committing a crime, he may claim remuneration from the media house involved. His right to human dignity will have been unfairly limited. A suspect’s right to a good name is protected by the law of defamation.”