No, definitely, but why I think it's ridiculous is because I remember a similar siutation against us last year where Terry went down, you guys carried on playing, we stole the ball to counter-attack, and the ref stopped play because Chelsea started pointing to Terry like they didn't know he was down before that. I'm sure something like that would've happened here. I'm not saying that the goal shouldn't have been given, it's just a bit iffy.
Yeah well, it's chances you take that either pay off or don't. I don;t really care either way, but if it was a midfielder that did it and the opposition went on to score - then I'd be pissed because they were lounging about instead of winning the ball back. Otherwise... live and let live. I'm sure if it happened the other way around you wouldn't mind
Oh yeah, how did Untied play? I know the result... but how did they actually play? An improvement on recent results or not?