HAL 9000
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 22,223
- Reaction score
- 25,881
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
More deflection, no evidence?@Cray, what, to your mind, does Klaus Schwab mean by 'The Great Reset'?
All i see is a made up image logo, no facts at all. And a quote apparently, with his picture on it - that also has nothing to do with the topic lol.Ahhhh! - Reuters - that lamestream media bastion of balanced, objective, neutral & factual news reporting - try harder!
View attachment 1806397
View attachment 1806398
View attachment 1806399
(P.S. - Image by REUTERS)
I can answer that from the book posted on the Amazon link above:@Cray, what, to your mind, does Klaus Schwab mean by 'The Great Reset'?
You are so full of sh*t, the article was talking about a digital footprint not actual personal privacy, Jesus can you even be honest for one day?Try explaining to the average female teenager, that they will be better off with no doors on their bedroom, and bathroom.
The article was saying you will have no privacy in terms of your digital footprint?You are so full of sh*t, the article was talking about a digital footprint not actual personal privacy, Jesus can you even be honest for one day?
Which is precisely why.....Bunch of sheep to the slaughter. It's almost too easy.
I can answer that from the book posted on the Amazon link above:
""COVID-19: The Great Reset" is a guide for anyone who wants to understand how COVID-19 disrupted our social and economic systems, and what changes will be needed to create a more inclusive, resilient and sustainable world going forward."
Still doesn't imply anything about any cabal operating in the background that made COVID-19 on purpose lol. His book is a response to what the virus did to us and what we can do (in his opinion) to make it better next time it happens.
So your analogy about a teenage girl having no physical privacy in that scenario was horse sh*t?The article was saying you will have no privacy in terms of your digital footprint?
It literally says 'you will have no privacy'. Even if it is limited to digital footprint, how is that a good thing?
Is it because central-planners over at the WEF have our best interests at heart, as opposed to being control-freaks?
Beginning to think you are a paid shill , no person can be this naiveSo your analogy about a teenage girl having no physical privacy in that scenario was horse sh*t?
Is it actually possible for you to make a point without miss-representing things?
What, because I call out Lexity's nonsense and conspiracy BS? You are welcome to post the part of the article that is remotely like what he claimed, I'll wait.Beginning to think you are a paid shill , no person can be this naive
You'll have to quote me commenting on the article.You are so full of sh*t, the article was talking about a digital footprint not actual personal privacy, Jesus can you even be honest for one day?
That's me quoting/commenting on the headline/title.