The push for a digital-only financial system.

@neoprema

I read today a quote by Klaus Schwab himself, saying claims his global agenda is Communist are just not true.

Gee.... sucks to be wrong.

I feel so silly now.
 
Cray said:
As usual, the devil is in the details which you ignore to fear monger. His account was frozen because he owes money for fines.

https://m.independent.ie/irish-news...-40000-in-frozen-bank-account/a226989077.html



The dude owes €79 100 in fines, his bank account hold €40 000.

The fines were levied for contempt of court and for breaching courts orders forbidding him to return to the school he was fired from.

But hey, don't let the truth get in the way of your BS narrative.
Click to expand...
Fired for saying that men cannot be woman. In other words, being fired for stating a plainly objective fact about reality.

That is the hill you are dying on.
 
lexity said:
Observation over the last several years, but especially in the last 2 - 3 months, in SA.....

Retail customers paying with cash are increasingly being treated as 2nd-class citizens.

I have my own suspicions as to why this is happening.

Just this week a teacher in Ireland had their bank account frozen for declining to use gender pronouns (a case of compelled speech).

Note: It would be very different if the plan was to run a dual system perpetually, which made digital-payments purely opt-in. (The clue is the fact there is a plan to eliminate cash. Free markets deprive control-freaks of the ability to dictate prices and quality. The natural tendency in a free market would be lowest-sustainable prices for the preferred quality)
Click to expand...
The better example is the fact that the Canukistanian government froze the bank accounts of people protesting against the vaccine mandates. Or even simply funding them.

No court order.

Jacques said that the financial measures in the Emergencies Act came into force on Feb. 15 and were specifically designed to apply enough financial pressure to convince protest organizers and participants to go home.

"Based on the knowledge that I have, I think it would be unlikely that someone who gave … $20 three weeks ago, or even $20 post Feb. 15, that they would have been captured by a freeze," she said.

"It's not impossible in view of the order, but in view of the exchange of information and the focused approach that was taken to stop the illegal funding of these activities, it would appear to be unlikely that this occurred, but not impossible."


She said the measures should not affect anyone who provided financial support to the convoy before Feb. 15. Jacques said that anyone who saw their account frozen and who subsequently left the blockade area should expect to see the account unfrozen in the coming days.
Click to expand...
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/emergency-bank-measures-finance-committee-1.6360769

Mr Trudeau said the scope of the measures would be "time-limited", "reasonable and proportionate" and would not see the military deployed.
With no need for court orders, banks can freeze personal accounts of anyone linked with the protests.
Hundreds of demonstrators remain in Canada's capital city.
On Sunday, law enforcement cleared anti-mandate protesters at the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor - a critical pathway for Canada-US trade - after a week-long stalemate.

What began as a rally against a new rule that all truckers must be vaccinated to cross the US-Canada border, or quarantine upon return, has grown into a broader challenge to all Covid health restrictions.
"This is about keeping Canadians safe, protecting people's jobs," Mr Trudeau told a news conference on Monday.
He said the police would be given "more tools" to imprison or fine protesters and protect critical infrastructure.
Click to expand...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60383385

Freezing someone's bank account for not wanting a flu vaccine.
 
konfab said:
Fired for saying that men cannot be woman. In other words, being fired for stating a plainly objective fact about reality.

That is the hill you are dying on.
Click to expand...
It's four fingers, Winston... regardless of how many you see.

Objective facts don't matter. The party is always right.

Understand who you are dealing with, otherwise it's re-education camp and the ministry of love, for you.
 
konfab said:
Fired for saying that men cannot be woman. In other words, being fired for stating a plainly objective fact about reality.
Click to expand...
Fired for not respecting the basic request of one of his students, what a great teacher. :rolleyes:
konfab said:
That is the hill you are dying on.
Click to expand...
Nope - you can argue about whether his firing was wrong/right all you like. But Lexity claimed that his bank accounts were frozen for "compelled speech". His accounts were actually frozen because he violated multiple court orders, was fined and the court froze his accounts because he refused to pay.

Am dying on the hill of people not making sh*t up to advance their views, you should try it some time.
 
Cray said:
Kudos for that admission.
Click to expand...
Clearly, you think I need praise for admitting I was commenting on a WEF one-liner/headline.

We've just had private property rights legally violated, in Klaus's poster-child political Rainbow project. The person who signed the act has been in lock-step with Klaus's fascist agenda for years.

Why should I not be free to call out the duplicity of the WEF's CEO?
 
lexity said:
Clearly, you think I need praise for admitting I was commenting on a WEF one-liner/headline.

We've just had private property rights legally violated, in Klaus's poster-child political Rainbow project. The person who signed the act has been in lock-step with Klaus's fascist agenda for years.

Why should I not be free to call out the duplicity of the WEF's CEO?
Click to expand...
"Heh! Heh! Heh!"... ;)

Cyril and Klaus WEF.png
 
HAL9000, have you read this article, by any chance?

unlimitedhangout.com

Dr. Klaus Schwab or: How the CFR Taught Me to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

The World Economic Forum wasn’t simply the brainchild of Klaus Schwab, but was actually born out of a CIA-funded Harvard program headed by Henry Kissinger and pushed to fruition by John K. Galbraith and the "real" Dr. Strangelove, Herman Kahn.
unlimitedhangout.com unlimitedhangout.com
 
lexity said:
Clearly, you think I need praise for admitting I was commenting on a WEF one-liner/headline.
Click to expand...
I thought it might indicate a change in your behaviour in that it might be better to read the whole article first instead making wildly incorrect assumptions about it based on a headline, if that, is not in fact the case, and you intend to continue as always then I withdraw my praise.
 
Cray said:
I thought it might indicate a change in your behaviour in that it might be better to read the whole article first instead making wildly incorrect assumptions about it based on a headline, if that, is not in fact the case, and you intend to continue as always then I withdraw my praise.
Click to expand...
I already said I wasn't aware it was linked to an article.

If I hover over the image in the post I quoted.... there is no link.

So, how could I have made 'wildly incorrect assumptions' about an article I didn't know existed?
 
lexity said:
I already said I wasn't aware it was linked to an article.
Click to expand...
So you think that the World Economic Forum put that single statement on their website without any further related exposition about what said future would be about, is that really the story you are going with?

lexity said:
If I hover over the image in the post I quoted.... there is no link.

So, how could I have made 'wildly incorrect assumptions' about an article I didn't know existed?
Click to expand...
That you assumptions were wildly incorrect has already been established, am just trying to figure out whether you are simply too lazy to check what the article actually said or were so keen to seemingly make a point that you simply didn't care what the article said. If your defence is that you didn't think that there was a linked article then I have to wonder if this is in fact your first time using the internet.
 
lexity said:
HAL9000, have you read this article, by any chance?

unlimitedhangout.com

Dr. Klaus Schwab or: How the CFR Taught Me to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

The World Economic Forum wasn’t simply the brainchild of Klaus Schwab, but was actually born out of a CIA-funded Harvard program headed by Henry Kissinger and pushed to fruition by John K. Galbraith and the "real" Dr. Strangelove, Herman Kahn.
unlimitedhangout.com unlimitedhangout.com
Click to expand...
I have just skim-read it now - it puts all of the disparate pieces of the jigsaw puzzle together to let you see the 'big picture' much more clearly - and all of the usual political & globalist suspects / influencers get a 'dishonourable mention' - I will read through it more thoroughly tonight... ;)
 
Cray said:
So you think that the World Economic Forum put that single statement on their website without any further related exposition about what said future would be about, is that really the story you are going with?

That you assumptions were wildly incorrect has already been established,
Click to expand...
Of course it has, just like the teacher was fired/fined not for what he did i.e. declining compelled speech, but for failing to comply with the courts' orders.

The assumptions and whether they could have existed is neither here nor there.

Cray said:
am just trying to figure out whether you are simply too lazy to check what the article actually said or were so keen to seemingly make a point that you simply didn't care what the article said. If your defence is that you didn't think that there was a linked article then I have to wonder if this is in fact your first time using the internet.
Click to expand...
Ha ha.. you're still struggling with this.

I didn't assume anything about a linked article.

There is no link in the image I responded to.

I saw a typical one-liner put out by an organization I know enough about to know that the one-liner/headline in question is 100% in keeping with their true agenda i.e. you can take it to the blockchain that ending the right to privacy of person and property is their #1 priority.

They both confirm and deny what they are doing. That's the kind of duplicity I was referring to. If you have a look at what they are actually doing e.g. infiltrating allegedly sovereign nations' governments, as a work around to democracy, you get a clearer idea of which statements they make are true and which ones are Commie mumbo-jumbo/Orwellian Newspeak.
 
lexity said:
Of course it has, just like the teacher was fired/fined not for what he did i.e. declining compelled speech, but for failing to comply with the courts' orders.

The assumptions and whether they could have existed is neither here nor there.


Ha ha.. you're still struggling with this.

I didn't assume anything about a linked article.

There is no link in the image I responded to.

I saw a typical one-liner put out by an organization I know enough about to know that the one-liner/headline in question is 100% in keeping with their true agenda
Click to expand...
You clearly don't know them nearly as well as you think you do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X