Do we really have the depth we so loudly claim we do?
Have to wonder when you look at the Europe leagues vs us at the grassroots/franchise lvl.
That said, for many of those in Europe, their player pools are bolstered to compete.... with South Africans.... So could be quite an interesting analysis imho.
Is it a matter of too many comps, or our player base itself is spread too far across the world by comparison to our competitors?
Correct.
Our domestic sides are all homegrown.
We pick a player here and there from the Congo, or Zim but 99.9% are local, while at the same time consistently hemorrhaging
our top players to foreign leagues.
ZAR is no much for Euro/Sterling/USD. Add to that the socio-political circus and why wouldn't players leave?
It's amazing that we able to compete at all.
The reason NZ doesn't consider overseas based players for the AB's is because their local league, NPC, Super Rugby etc would be reduced to rubble if they experienced a mass exodus. So they protecting their local league at the expense of the national team.
Razor is only half the issue...
Anyway... it's complicated.. balancing player work load, winning, building squad depth on a comparatively meagre budget etc etc etc
I'm also of the opinion that player drain extends to other aspects of the sport. Our best coaches are employed abroad. Franco Smith, Johan van Graan, Nienaber, Andries Pretorious, Frans Ludeke, Gary Gold, Matthew Proudfoot etc etc etc medical practitioners too. Sports rehabilitation in rugby is fundamental!
Many, many challenges that are unique to South Africa.