The SA Politics Thread Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
The CIC is heavily defended and this punk would be lucky to even get within a few meters of him.

Bodyguards-surround-ANCYL-President-Julius-Malema-and-Winnie-Madikizela-Mandela-outside-the-Johannesburg-High-Court-Picture-Motshwari-Mofokeng

Do you make a habit of posting photos of your brah before he was out in the cold?
 
So that would count as de Ruyter reporting it. Did Gordhan now follow through?
No that doesn't count as reporting shít. Gordan is an commie, corrupt himself, and in no position to to anything about corruption.
Typical middle management mentality, "but, but, I did inform my manager" not a quality you are looking for in a CEO
 
The DA looting City of Tshwane.

Interesting. At the 2 min mark he mentions the transactions in question took place in 2015-2016. Maybe listen to your own podcast before try and use this blame the DA for something. I understand that is difficult considering it is 702, no sane person listen to that nonsense willing.

But I agree with you were is the DA and why aren't they taking action against past corrupt ANC officials.
 
Interesting. At the 2 min mark he mentions the transactions in question took place in 2015-2016. Maybe listen to your own podcast before try and use this blame the DA for something. I understand that is difficult considering it is 702, no sane person listen to that nonsense willing.

But I agree with you were is the DA and why aren't they taking action against past corrupt ANC officials.
I have read some story about ActionSA councillors who are involved in some property syndicate in Tshwane, I don't know if it's the same story.
 
I have read some story about ActionSA councillors who are involved in some property syndicate in Tshwane, I don't know if it's the same story.
As a EFF supporter you don't even believe in property. So I guess it is all the same.
 
The Tshwane UF coalition is still on. The only difference is they're getting a new mayor.
that's where it all falls apart.

They're on the BRINK ...

 
He is saying De Ruyter name dropped and offered him nothing more in terms of evidence. I think De Ruyter must have to come clean on the information he relied on to make the accusation and if he did give it to Gordhan. So he is pushing this back to him.

The PDA is nice because it does not put any obligation on the whistleblower as far as the accuracy of the information provided, all it requires is that the whistleblower made the claims in good faith and genuinely believing they are true, and that has to be based on something.

How do you know that Gordhan was not shown exactly what Daily Maverick was shown? He has an obligation to look into these allegations. It's coming from a CEO of the biggest SOE in the country. Yet he just dismisses it out of hand? Come on my friend, really? Can't you smell the cover-up?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X