Hey, it was an exaggerated example but a valid one none the less. I say if you're downloading 50gb of whatever for your own use then big deal - there is no reason to assume that anyone is actually losing out on anything. If you didnt download it why must it be assumed as fact that you would actually have paid for it?Bwana now you are just taking the p!ss...
If you only d/l one episode of 24 that has been on mnet and digitised dvd's you paid for then you are obviously not in the same boat as someone who d/l's 50 gig a month of movies and series that don't belong to them.
I agree with Macguyver in that it is strange that pirates band together and pat each other on the back... Maybe child molestation is a bit harsh but I see his point.
It's like a bunch of shoplifters going to the pub afterwards and bragging about how many movies and games they swiped from Musica.... It's not cool
If you subscribe to DSTV it is perfectly reasonable to assume that you are in fact paying for it down the road so all you're doing is a bit of time-shifting, a practice that DSTV actually encourages with their PRV. You can fast forward thorough all the ads at a press of a button so even the argument that DSTV might actually be losing out on ad revenue doesnt fly.
What I dont abide by is profiting from selling downloaded materials but thats my own personal objection.