Tom Clancy has died

My favourite author (not because he was the best writer ever ... but because he created my best loved characters ever) David Eddings died 4 years ago.
 
WTF does R.I.P. really mean.

What if a person has been at peace his/her entire life. Now all of a sudden you're wishing a peaceful afterlife upon this person ... Why?

For example, me. If I die in a car accident tomorrow ... the transition would NOT be towards one of R&R and peace. I'm already at peace.

Is R&R really the preferred state of being dead???

How do you know?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WTF does R.I.P. really mean.

What if a person has been at peace his/her entire life. Now all of a sudden you're wishing a peaceful afterlife upon this person ... Why?

For example, me. If I die in a car accident tomorrow ... the transition would NOT be towards one of R&R and peace.

Is R&R really the preferred state of being dead???

How do you know?

It just an expression of empathy I suppose. Kinda like "Good day" is a greeting.
 
It just an expression of empathy I suppose. Kinda like "Good day" is a greeting.

But it seems too superficial to be taken seriously. It's too much a transposition of one set of emotions on top of another.
 
He was an excellent author.

Loved his Net Force series, as well as the older ones.
 
WTF does R.I.P. really mean.

What if a person has been at peace his/her entire life. Now all of a sudden you're wishing a peaceful afterlife upon this person ... Why?

For example, me. If I die in a car accident tomorrow ... the transition would NOT be towards one of R&R and peace. I'm already at peace.

Is R&R really the preferred state of being dead???

How do you know?

But it seems too superficial to be taken seriously. It's too much a transposition of one set of emotions on top of another.

I usually never say RIP, since I always have some other comment/s. In his case, with his worldviews, I thought it would be very appropriate, this time. No emotion, just RIP... ;)
 
But it seems too superficial to be taken seriously.

Taken seriously? Of course not, I doubt that anyone here is in any real grief over the passing of a complete stranger.

People are saddened to a degree and feel the need to express something.
 
In this case the complete stranger wrote vivid tales of what a real WW3 would be like in Europe, and once phoned a contact at the Air Force with a innocent question - that caused some serious meetings at the Pentagon and a lot of worried people.
I grew up reading his books. Of course I feel sad. Someone who helped form my outlook on life has died.
 
Sad - I loved his books and read all of them.

I remember him being interviewed on 9/11 on CNN where he said that all of his reasearch had shown that planes would be used to fly into important buildings at some point. That is why he had written about it in Debt of Honour.

Well before National Security Advisor Condolezza Rice and President Bush went on record to say (in effect) that no one could have imagined or predicted that terrorists would hijack planes and crash them into buildings; and long before war games planned at the highest levels of our national security and defense apparatus for the day of 9/11/01 involving simulated hijacking of planes (e.g., Vigilant Guardian, Amalgam Virgo) and the simulation of a plane crashing into a building (e.g., the 9/11/01 drill at the National Reconnaissance Office in Chantilly, Virginia); and well before a photo-realistic graphic image of the burning WTC towers would appear on a rap music CD cover; and even before former Director of Central Intelligence, John Deutch, along with former National Security Council member, Philip Zelikow, speculated in the CFR journal, [Foreign Affairs, Nov/Dec 1998], about the consequences of an amplified version of the 1993 WTC tower bombing that "Like Pearl Harbor" would be an event that would "divide our past and our future into a before and after" --- yes, long before any of these imaginings and manifestations; Tom Clancy's, 1994 novel [Debt of Honor] told of a JAL 747 jumbo jet being crashed intentionally into a ceremony on Capitol Hill, killing most of the top functionaries in U.S. government leading to an "after" (in the Clancy sequel [Executive Orders]) involving the imposition of martial law.

I can't find the total sales figures for [Debt of Honor] or [Executive Orders] but the sequel to [Executive Orders] in the Ryanverse series is reported to have had a blockbusting first printing of two million copies. Therefore, there must be more than a few people including some prominent government and military officials, investment bankers, intelligence officers, secret-society members, and conservative-foundation think-tank employees, who, prior to 9/11, imagined (with Clancy's help) a terrorist act involving the crashing of a jetliner into a building in the United States to kill people leading to radical government change.

A reviewer for the UK Amazon.com website (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Executive-Orders-Tom-Clancy/dp/0006479758) says: "[Executive Orders] is Tom Clancy's follow up to his best selling novel [Debt of Honor] and begins moments after the ending of the previous novel. [Debt of Honor] left the Capitol building destroyed, the President killed, most of Congress killed, and all 9 members of the Supreme Court killed. Most other top officials of the government were also killed in a horrible attack reminiscent of September 11, 2001 (even though the novel was written years before that event). While not intending to be, Tom Clancy was very prophetic in writing about the events that led up to [Executive Orders]."

While the Wikipedia review (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_of_Honor) is careful to admonish: "The ending also has coincidental parallels with the September 11, 2001 attacks, although the disaster is not caused by terrorists." Thanks for that very important clarification - Wikipedia. We'll note that the incident Clancy describes was caused by a single, embittered man, i.e., a "lone-nut." In fact, many meta-events in our history seem to be caused by what now deceased FBI Director J.E. Hoover called a "person in the category of a nut." I haven't read the Clancy books and I'm not trying to sell Clancy books, but I give Clancy credit for helping to prepare us in 1996 for what played out in 2001. Clancy's writings were not "reminiscent" of 9/11, rather, they were prescient. Given Clancy's record of preparing us for our future, should we take his novel [The Sum of All Fears] more seriously?

http://911blogger.com/node/14694
 
Novelist Tom Clancy a master of military thrillers

With CIA analyst Jack Ryan, Tom Clancy created a character that spoke to audiences from both page and screen, representing the changing mood of a country facing growing geopolitical challenges.

Clancy brought such realism and attention to detail to his novels that in 1985, a year after the Cold War thriller "The Hunt for Red October" came out, a military official suspected the author of having access to classified material.

"Thrillers, like all art, are always a reflection of the culture," said fellow author Brad Meltzer. "No one captured that Cold War fear - and that uniquely American perspective - like Clancy. Jack Ryan wasn't just a character. He was us. He was every American in those days when we were a push-of-the-button away from nuclear war."

The best-selling novelist, who died Tuesday in Baltimore at 66, insisted then, and after, that his information was strictly unclassified: books, interviews and papers that were easily obtained. Also, two submarine officers reviewed the final manuscript.

Government officials may have worried how Clancy knew that a Russian submarine spent only about 15 percent of its time at sea or how many Seahawk missiles it carried. But his extreme attention to technical detail and accuracy earned him respect inside the intelligence community and beyond. It also helped make Clancy the most widely read and influential military novelist of his time, one who seemed to capture a shift in the country's mood away from the CIA misdeeds that were exposed in the 1970s to the heroic feats of Jack Ryan.

Fans couldn't turn the pages fast enough and a number of his thrillers, including "The Hunt for Red October," "Patriot Games" and "Clear and Present Danger," were made into blockbuster movies, with another Jack Ryan film set for release on Christmas Day.

"Fundamentally, I think of myself as a storyteller, not a writer," Clancy once said. "I think about the characters I've created, and then I sit down and start typing and see what they will do. There's a lot of subconscious thought that goes on."

A tall, trim figure given to wearing sunglasses that made him look like a fighter pilot, Clancy had such a sure grasp of defense technology and spycraft that many readers were convinced he served in the military. But his experience was limited to ROTC classes in college. Near-sightedness kept him out of active duty.

In 1982, he began working on "The Hunt for Red October," drawing inspiration from a real-life 1975 mutiny aboard a Soviet missile frigate. He sold the manuscript to the first publisher he tried, the Naval Institute Press, which had never bought original fiction. In real life, the mutiny was put down, but in Clancy's book, a Soviet submarine skipper hands his vessel over to the U.S. and defects.

Someone thought enough of the novel to give it to President Ronald Reagan as a Christmas gift. The president quipped at a dinner that he was losing sleep because he couldn't put the book down - a statement Clancy later said helped put him on the New York Times best-seller list.

"What happened to me was pure dumb luck. I'm not the new Hemingway," Clancy later said in an interview with the American Movie Channel.

"Of course, fortune does favor the brave. In battle, you forgive a man anything except an unwillingness to take risks. Sometimes you have to put it on the line. What I did was take time away from how I earned my living. My wife gave me hell. 'Why are you doing this?' But she doesn't complain anymore."

Clancy said his dream had been simply to publish a book, hopefully a good one, so that he would be in the Library of Congress catalog. His dreams were answered many times over, with worldwide sales of his books estimated to exceed 100 million copies.

Alec Baldwin, Ben Affleck and Harrison Ford have all played Jack Ryan on screen and "Jack Ryan: Shadow One" is set to open on Christmas Day, starring Chris Pine as Ryan.

Clancy wasn't always happy about the movie versions of his books. He complained that Ford was too old to play Jack Ryan, and he regretted the lack of creative control, saying: "Giving your book to Hollywood is like turning your daughter over to a pimp."

Clancy started off writing about the Russians, but also told stories of Latin American drug cartels, Irish-British tensions and Islamic terrorism. He wrote nonfiction works on the military and ventured into video games, with a number of best-selling titles.

His recent Jack Ryan novels were collaborations with Mark Greaney, including "Threat Vector" and a release scheduled for December, "Command Authority." As of midday Wednesday, "Command Authority" was No. 35 on Amazon's best-seller list.

Born in Baltimore on April 12, 1947, to a mailman and his wife, Clancy was fascinated by military history as a child. He entered Loyola College as a physics major but switched to English as a sophomore. He later said he wasn't smart enough for the rigors of science, though he clearly mastered it in his fiction.

After school, he worked in an insurance office that had military clients. By the early 1980s he had written a piece about the MX missile system that was published by the Naval Institute. Boredom with his job led him to try novels. He wrote daily and set a goal of five completed pages a day.


Source : Sapa-AP /ss
Date : 03 Oct 2013 07:54
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X