U.S. Politics

[Kieppie]

Strange because White Nationalists loved it.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1380655142668750848

How about you whip out your crayons and explain what his theory means?

Hahaha MediaMatters? Seriously? That's almost like quoting Qanon.

edit : The burden is on you to prove your claims. So show those crayons.
Here I'll even highlight an important line in the interview since it seems no one actually watched it.

"Everyone wants to make a racial issue out of it: Oooh, the ‘white replacement theory’ – No, no no. This is a voting rights question"

 

[Kieppie]

A hit dog will holler... and you do holler so, Kieppie.

A hit person will holler. So...

As long as you hear your own dog whistles then that's fine, but don't project.

 

[buka001]

Hahaha MediaMatters? Seriously? That's almost like quoting Qanon.

edit : The burden is on you to prove your claims. So show those crayons.
Here I'll even highlight an important line in the interview since it seems no one actually watched it.

"Everyone wants to make a racial issue out of it: Oooh, the ‘white replacement theory’ – No, no no. This is a voting rights question"

Did you bother to read the actual source material in the article?

No, because that dissolves your point.

 

[Kieppie]

Did you bother to read the actual source material in the article?

No, because that dissolves your point.

Nothing MM says is credible. Like I said it is like quoting Qanon.

Did you watch the Fox segment? No? That is the true source material not some opinion about what he said.
Don't try the "We know what he actually meant" nonsense.

 

[RanzB]

 

[Kieppie]

</snip> fake

*sigh* Stop pasting pictures you see without first checking.

 

[buka001]

Nothing MM says is credible. Like I said it is like quoting Qanon.

Did you watch the Fox segment? No? That is the true source material not some opinion about what he said.
Don't try the "We know what he actually meant" nonsense.

They not saying anything.

They put up screenshots of discussions from the people you are defending, celebrating Tucker Carlson's discussion on the replacement theory.

If it was a not a dog whistle, why are all those dogs howling with joy, in response to his discussion?

 

[Kieppie]

They not saying anything.

Really? Funny that they quite often make things up.
And if they don't say anything how come the have a news & analysis section?

Maybe look into how MM and the ADL influences social media companies behind the scenes. Unless you consider leaked documents a conspiracy.

They put up screenshots of discussions from the people you are defending, celebrating Tucker Carlson's discussion on the replacement theory.

If it was a not a dog whistle, why are all those dogs howling with joy, in response to his discussion?

Don't know. Ask the howling dogs who brought it up. People see what they want to see.

 

[buka001]

Really? Funny that they quite often make things up.
And if they don't say anything how come the have a news & analysis section?

Maybe look into how MM and the ADL influences social media companies behind the scenes. Unless you consider leaked documents a conspiracy.


Don't know. Ask the howling dogs who brought it up. People see what they want to see.

Which is what Tucker knows and what he wanted them too see.

 

[Kieppie]

As a side note there is some truth to the "Replacement theory", but Not in the way they think.
Everyone will eventually be replaced or rather absorbed into an almost homogenous racial group. So in that sense yes the Whites will die out, but so will other racial groups as well.

It's purely a function of integration and time.

It will be interesting seeing the world in a thousand+ years (if we survive)

 

[Kieppie]

Which is what Tucker knows and what he wanted them too see.

Tucker is NOT a white supremacist so he wouldn't care what they see or believe.
Doesn't matter how many times you claim this.

 

[buka001]

Tucker is NOT a white supremacist so he wouldn't care what they see or believe.
Doesn't matter how many times you claim this.

Who cares what he is? You can't prove he isn't. I can't prove he is.

Its what he says and what the viewers have taken from what he says.

 

[scudsucker]

Tucker is NOT a white supremacist so he wouldn't care what they see or believe.
Doesn't matter how many times you claim this.

He's a known liar who lies to attract an audience of white supremacists.

How else would you categorise this behaviour? Of course he is espousing white supremacist ideas, and... wait for it, just like your support of Trump makes you a Trumpist, his support of white supremacist garbage makes him a white supremacist sympathiser.

I would expect you to get this concept, as you have accused me of being racist based on nothing but the fact I am left leaning.

 

[Kieppie]

Who cares what he is? You can't prove he isn't. I can't prove he is.

Its what he says and what the viewers have taken from what he says.

He said nothing that would suggest he is.
He's a very moderate conservative. Albeit with some strange ideas at times.
Again the burden is on you. Statistically speaking you are wrong though.

 

[Kieppie]

He's a known liar who lies to attract an audience of white supremacists.

How else would you categorise this behaviour? Of course he is espousing white supremacist ideas, and... wait for it, just like your support of Trump makes you a Trumpist, his support of white supremacist garbage makes him a white supremacist sympathiser.

Stop talking nonsense. You're just regurgitating talking points from his distractors.

He gives his opinions. Sometimes his opinions seem a bit far fetched. That doesn't make him a White Supremacist.

I would expect you to get this concept, as you have accused me of being racist based on nothing but the fact I am left leaning.

Oh I understand your way of thinking, but that doesn't mean it's correct.
Calling you, and others, a racist is due to Identity politics and CRT being inherently racist. These ideologies are favored by those on the left.
Statistically speaking I am more likely to be correct than someone claiming a conservative is a white supremacist.

If you don't believe in this then congratulations you are a more rational person.

 

[scudsucker]

Everyone will eventually be replaced or rather absorbed into an almost homogenous racial group. So in that sense yes the Whites will die out, but so will other racial groups as well.

It's purely a function of integration and time.

You have clearly never visited Brazil.

 

[scudsucker]

Statistically speaking I am more likely to be correct than someone claiming a conservative is a white supremacist.

Of course, you, being intellectually honest and all... have a cite to support this remarkable claim?

 

[Kieppie]

You have clearly never visited Brazil.

How they appear outwardly is not really the issue.

It takes time. A lot of time. Interracial marriage or just dating is a relatively new thing historically speaking.

As an example look at how many people carry Genghis Khan's DNA. You can't "un mix" genes

 

[buka001]

He said nothing that would suggest he is.
He's a very moderate conservative. Albeit with some strange ideas at times.
Again the burden is on you. Statistically speaking you are wrong though.

He is a paleoconservative. Not really "moderate".

I've already proven my statement. That his comments about replacement theory attracted support and praise from white nationalists.

It's your strawman that I am saying he is a white nationalist.

 

[scudsucker]

Of course, you, being intellectually honest and all... have a cite to support this remarkable claim?

That would be a "no" then?

Let us all remind ourselves of the time

The burden is on you to prove your claims.

And that time

When an argument is made it devolves into this because they can't counter.

...and the time

Funny how you make unfounded claims like that.

...oh, yes, and the time

Adding zero value to the conversation.

Keep being you.

I think I may have had occasion to point out your hypocrisy before, but oh, well, here we go again.