And in other news, unlimited tanks of fuel ruined the roads....
(only car analogy I could think of)
And a bad one at that.
Too many cars on a road will indeed ruin it, just go for a drive to cape town or jo'burg 7:00am on a weekday.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
And in other news, unlimited tanks of fuel ruined the roads....
(only car analogy I could think of)
I don't have uncapped but it looks like I may be suffering the consequences of everyone downloading. My exchange is apparently congested and that's why in the evenings I get terrible speeds and latency. So yes I agree with Pooky. The idea of uncapped is great but in some places the infrastructure wasn't ready. Or Telkom is lying and just doesn't want to fix my line.
I don't have uncapped but it looks like I may be suffering the consequences of everyone downloading. My exchange is apparently congested and that's why in the evenings I get terrible speeds and latency. So yes I agree with Pooky. The idea of uncapped is great but in some places the infrastructure wasn't ready. Or Telkom is lying and just doesn't want to fix my line.
So Pooky why not just buy capped then?
So Pooky why not just buy capped then? The Internet are not ruined, it's the greedy ISP's that are "ruined" or are ruining he Internet experience. They are stupid as like everything else they will fade away due to competition as the next step would be to supply unruined Internet to the consumers.
AFAIK the problem is that capped users end up in the same 'swamp' as uncapped, either because of congestion at the exchange/DSLAM level (Telkom ADSL monopoly), or because bandwidth is pooled into one route (MWeb-SEACOM), with only partly (in)effective 'shaping' rules.
The internet is a shared resource (like water and electricity), IMO there is no way to get value-for-money and optimal user experience, without some degree of cross-subsidisation.
This is not just a local problem. In the USA major ISP's would like to charge differently for high-priority traffic, but are stopped from doing so by FCC net-neutrality rules.
Can anyone here tell me when MWEB starts throttling users on a 4Mb account? Is it after 30GB? I'm considering a capped 100GB account with Afrihost, but perhaps MWEB uncapped is bettter?
They do not throttle they have systems in place that restrict high end users during the day from about 8am till about 9pm at night. They target p2p and other highend dowloading stuff.
But after about 9pm your speed kicks in and you have rather high downloads.
Normal HTTP and other stuff is not throttled at all.
I have a 384 uncapped account and easily download about 1gig a day, more on weekends. That is when i am actually downloading stuff.
The big thing for me is game play, games like battlefield etc use a ton of bandwidth to regularly play. With uncapped I never have to worry![]()
Thanks... so does anyone know what they term as a high end user? If i'm hitting 30 - 40gigs a month (relatively evenly spread) is that high use? Most bandwidth used during day time - no p2p... just web browsing, skype, email, and the occasional msdn software download (via http).
What he was trying to say is that it doesn't matter how much you use, P2P etc downloads are shaped as much for someone using 1Gb as they are for someone pulling 1Tb. Http is never shaped, generally full speed. And 30-40Gb is pretty low usage on a 4Mb account.
Ah... I understand nowThanks... this looks appealing.