Uproar over matric rape question

I understand that this is a drama class, but personally I don't get how such a graphic description of a crime is beneficial in any way at all?
Children do not need to be told how to explicitly murder someone in order for them to learn that murder is wrong.
If anything, I think there is a danger here of introducing concepts and thoughts to impressionable young minds that have never yet in their lives ever entertained such horrors.
 
That has got to be one of the most f***ed things I've seen with the current education system.
 
Response from the Moderator...
http://springsadvertiser.co.za/82406/matric-paper-response-moderator/#.UpXQNoyQYtg.facebook



RE: Dramatic Arts

Paper 1: Written. Question Paper

National Curriculum Statement

National Senior Certificate

2013

I was asked in my capacity as Internal Moderator for the subject Dramatic Arts to respond to the following question.

I will do my best in my response to address the obvious concern that the complaint reveals.

I hope to reassure the person that we deal responsibly with the young adults entrusted to us.

We are aware that by the time a learner is in Grade 12 they will have begun to be faced with the realities of adulthood, often beyond the security of their homes and the school system.

We hope to provide them with the skills and critical thinking to respond to what they encounter in their daily lives.

This is one of the profound benefits of the subject Dramatic Arts, that it allows young adults to confront real matters through the safety of story. (See below, Note 5. The kind of learner that is envisaged by the NCS)

The play and question the complaint refers to, for instance, gives them the opportunity to deal with and comment on the horror of child rape functionally, critically, creatively; a response that will empower them to restore health in society.

Dramatic Arts does deal with hard realities and issues of social transformation, social justice and human awareness.

The relevant question, to which I am responding, is 11.3.2: ‘Describe how you would get the actor portraying Simon to perform line 9 to maximize the horror of the rape for the audience.’

The question is from the play, Tshepang, written by Lara Foot formerly Director at the Market Theatre and currently CEO of the Baxter Theatre in Cape Town.

The play won several National and International awards.

This play and the extract was selected for a question, because it highlights and interrogates one of the most distressing brutalities of our current South African society.

The subject Dramatic Arts by its very nature responds to and reflects on all kinds of themes that affect our society and asks us to engage with these. It does this to raise consciousness of issues beyond the facts alone to emotional and imaginative levels that help us to perceive our humanity a little more fully.

Out of this is born opportunities for healing, for restoring respect, safety, dignity, freedom, rights or any other of the things we value in a democracy.

Dramatic Arts is therefore a contextual subject.

It operates within a given human context, which is never ideal, conflict free or entirely just.

The play, Tshepang, is a profound example. It is based on a real event, headlined by the media, that disturbed the nation.

The brutal and horrific rape of a baby is about as far as we can regress from desirable human behaviour. I

t is an act that shocks us so deeply that few of us, if it were not reported, would want to believe it possible.

And given the facts alone, we are free to imagine it was the act of something monstrous, inhuman.

When something like this happens, as it all too often does in our society, it points to something missing or broken in the fabric of the community in which it happens.

The playwright had the courage in this instance to investigate the predicament of all of those involved in this story – the tiny victim, her mother, the perpetrator and their environment– that led to this act that mangled the lives of all of them.

The terrible truth that emerges from the play is that the act was perpetrated by a recognisable human being and not a monster.

It is this essential truth that needs to be faced if we are to begin the journey of healing and of changing the circumstances that led to it.

“She (Lara Foot, the writer) employs refined, ironic humour to sketch a colourful portrait of the community.

Then, by turning everyday objects into symbols, investing them with emotional connotations, we experience the horror poetically.

The rape itself is enacted using a broomstick and a loaf of white bread.” Review

The complaint states: ‘there is a question that required pupils to describe in ‘much horror and detail’ the brutal rape of a nine-month old baby?’

This interpretation is incorrect; the actual question in the question paper asks for something different. It asks the candidate to ‘describe how you would help the actor portraying Simon to perform line 9 to maximize the horror of the rape for the audience.’

Line 9, to which the question refers, is a climactic moment in the play, in which the audience is faced with the Dramatic Arts concept of an action metaphor.

Instead of raping a baby or showing the rape or describing the rape, the symbols of a loaf of bread and a broom stick are used to represent and resemble the brutal act of the rape.

The horror and aversion the audience feels is achieved without resorting to an actual rape.

This is intended, and it is up to the director and the actor playing Simon, to work out the best way to achieve it theatrically and symbolically. This is also exactly what the question asks of the candidate, nothing more.

The candidate only has to explain how the symbol and metaphor of the stick and the bread can be used theatrically (the use of lighting, sound, stage, props etc.) to make an audience feel the horror of such a brutal act on such a vulnerable baby.

Nowhere is it expected of the candidate to have to literally describe the actual act of raping a nine-month-old baby.

Question 11 is valid and fair because the rape of babies is a relevant societal issue. In technical terms it is also asking the learner to present how, the horror of the act can be conveyed, theatrically, to an audience.

This is not to create hysteria, but to sensitise an audience to the horror and, at best, to have them walk out of the theatre determined to prevent such horrific and brutal acts from being perpetrated.

It is a valid question also because it asks candidates to deliberate on social transformation and justice, to integrate and apply competence and to consider human rights, environmental and social justice.

It finally requires from a candidate to respond within the framework of the subject Dramatic Arts, that is, theatrically; using symbols and metaphors to create a powerful emotional reality. This is consistent with them having to: identify and solve problems; make decisions using critical and creative thinking; collecting analysing, organising and critically evaluating information; communicating effectively using visual, symbolic and/or language skills in various modes demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem solving contexts do not exist in isolation.

A subject such as the rape of a 9 month old baby, is not new to a Dramatic Arts candidate in Grade 12. They will through media and cinema have been exposed to many horrific images and reports of, for instance, murder, xenophobia and rape. What is perhaps new is that through the subject Dramatic Arts they get to engage with it and comment on it in a critical, creative and theatrical manner.

The discussed question for instance tested two main elements:

1. Learners awareness of the brutality of the rape of a baby

2. If learners can theatrically and metaphorically portray that awareness for the audience.

These two elements represent the abilities of candidates to empathise, to analyze and to express creatively. These are important skills for those who are poised to become the leaders of the future.

In conclusion, I have asked learners from Desmond Tutu Secondary(Mbekweni, Paarl) to give me their honest opinion of the question.

Herewith their response, via the educator:

Although it seemed a very harsh scene in the play, my learners did not find anything shocking or out of the ordinary about the subject matter.

It is, as they said some harsh realities that they have to deal with every day and something they fully could identify with.

They also agree that theatre is supposed to develop consciousness about the world around you and then show it creatively on stage.

They say that they’ve seen worst things on the TV these days.

This horror situation is familiar and part of their everyday reality, which they have to cope with.’

I have done my best to answer the complaint. I hope that I have reassured the person that the inclusion of the question was not irresponsible or careless.

Education department responds to complaints: http://springsadvertiser.co.za/?p=82396
 
Response from the Moderator...
http://springsadvertiser.co.za/82406/matric-paper-response-moderator/#.UpXQNoyQYtg.facebook



RE: Dramatic Arts

Paper 1: Written. Question Paper

National Curriculum Statement

National Senior Certificate

2013

I was asked in my capacity as Internal Moderator for the subject Dramatic Arts to respond to the following question.

I will do my best in my response to address the obvious concern that the complaint reveals.

I hope to reassure the person that we deal responsibly with the young adults entrusted to us.

We are aware that by the time a learner is in Grade 12 they will have begun to be faced with the realities of adulthood, often beyond the security of their homes and the school system.

We hope to provide them with the skills and critical thinking to respond to what they encounter in their daily lives.

This is one of the profound benefits of the subject Dramatic Arts, that it allows young adults to confront real matters through the safety of story. (See below, Note 5. The kind of learner that is envisaged by the NCS)

The play and question the complaint refers to, for instance, gives them the opportunity to deal with and comment on the horror of child rape functionally, critically, creatively; a response that will empower them to restore health in society.

Dramatic Arts does deal with hard realities and issues of social transformation, social justice and human awareness.

The relevant question, to which I am responding, is 11.3.2: ‘Describe how you would get the actor portraying Simon to perform line 9 to maximize the horror of the rape for the audience.’

The question is from the play, Tshepang, written by Lara Foot formerly Director at the Market Theatre and currently CEO of the Baxter Theatre in Cape Town.

The play won several National and International awards.

This play and the extract was selected for a question, because it highlights and interrogates one of the most distressing brutalities of our current South African society.

The subject Dramatic Arts by its very nature responds to and reflects on all kinds of themes that affect our society and asks us to engage with these. It does this to raise consciousness of issues beyond the facts alone to emotional and imaginative levels that help us to perceive our humanity a little more fully.

Out of this is born opportunities for healing, for restoring respect, safety, dignity, freedom, rights or any other of the things we value in a democracy.

Dramatic Arts is therefore a contextual subject.

It operates within a given human context, which is never ideal, conflict free or entirely just.

The play, Tshepang, is a profound example. It is based on a real event, headlined by the media, that disturbed the nation.

The brutal and horrific rape of a baby is about as far as we can regress from desirable human behaviour. I

t is an act that shocks us so deeply that few of us, if it were not reported, would want to believe it possible.

And given the facts alone, we are free to imagine it was the act of something monstrous, inhuman.

When something like this happens, as it all too often does in our society, it points to something missing or broken in the fabric of the community in which it happens.

The playwright had the courage in this instance to investigate the predicament of all of those involved in this story – the tiny victim, her mother, the perpetrator and their environment– that led to this act that mangled the lives of all of them.

The terrible truth that emerges from the play is that the act was perpetrated by a recognisable human being and not a monster.

It is this essential truth that needs to be faced if we are to begin the journey of healing and of changing the circumstances that led to it.

“She (Lara Foot, the writer) employs refined, ironic humour to sketch a colourful portrait of the community.

Then, by turning everyday objects into symbols, investing them with emotional connotations, we experience the horror poetically.

The rape itself is enacted using a broomstick and a loaf of white bread.” Review

The complaint states: ‘there is a question that required pupils to describe in ‘much horror and detail’ the brutal rape of a nine-month old baby?’

This interpretation is incorrect; the actual question in the question paper asks for something different. It asks the candidate to ‘describe how you would help the actor portraying Simon to perform line 9 to maximize the horror of the rape for the audience.’

Line 9, to which the question refers, is a climactic moment in the play, in which the audience is faced with the Dramatic Arts concept of an action metaphor.

Instead of raping a baby or showing the rape or describing the rape, the symbols of a loaf of bread and a broom stick are used to represent and resemble the brutal act of the rape.

The horror and aversion the audience feels is achieved without resorting to an actual rape.

This is intended, and it is up to the director and the actor playing Simon, to work out the best way to achieve it theatrically and symbolically. This is also exactly what the question asks of the candidate, nothing more.

The candidate only has to explain how the symbol and metaphor of the stick and the bread can be used theatrically (the use of lighting, sound, stage, props etc.) to make an audience feel the horror of such a brutal act on such a vulnerable baby.

Nowhere is it expected of the candidate to have to literally describe the actual act of raping a nine-month-old baby.

Question 11 is valid and fair because the rape of babies is a relevant societal issue. In technical terms it is also asking the learner to present how, the horror of the act can be conveyed, theatrically, to an audience.

This is not to create hysteria, but to sensitise an audience to the horror and, at best, to have them walk out of the theatre determined to prevent such horrific and brutal acts from being perpetrated.

It is a valid question also because it asks candidates to deliberate on social transformation and justice, to integrate and apply competence and to consider human rights, environmental and social justice.

It finally requires from a candidate to respond within the framework of the subject Dramatic Arts, that is, theatrically; using symbols and metaphors to create a powerful emotional reality. This is consistent with them having to: identify and solve problems; make decisions using critical and creative thinking; collecting analysing, organising and critically evaluating information; communicating effectively using visual, symbolic and/or language skills in various modes demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem solving contexts do not exist in isolation.

A subject such as the rape of a 9 month old baby, is not new to a Dramatic Arts candidate in Grade 12. They will through media and cinema have been exposed to many horrific images and reports of, for instance, murder, xenophobia and rape. What is perhaps new is that through the subject Dramatic Arts they get to engage with it and comment on it in a critical, creative and theatrical manner.

The discussed question for instance tested two main elements:

1. Learners awareness of the brutality of the rape of a baby

2. If learners can theatrically and metaphorically portray that awareness for the audience.

These two elements represent the abilities of candidates to empathise, to analyze and to express creatively. These are important skills for those who are poised to become the leaders of the future.

In conclusion, I have asked learners from Desmond Tutu Secondary(Mbekweni, Paarl) to give me their honest opinion of the question.

Herewith their response, via the educator:

Although it seemed a very harsh scene in the play, my learners did not find anything shocking or out of the ordinary about the subject matter.

It is, as they said some harsh realities that they have to deal with every day and something they fully could identify with.

They also agree that theatre is supposed to develop consciousness about the world around you and then show it creatively on stage.

They say that they’ve seen worst things on the TV these days.

This horror situation is familiar and part of their everyday reality, which they have to cope with.’

I have done my best to answer the complaint. I hope that I have reassured the person that the inclusion of the question was not irresponsible or careless.

Education department responds to complaints: http://springsadvertiser.co.za/?p=82396

While valid concern I think next time they will think twice
 
Yes, yes - all the academic waffle above is fine and good in the context of a classroom and in the context of the full transcript of the play in question, where the subject can be fully explored, but in the context of an exam....inappropriate methinks.

Was the play a set play for Grade 12 drama students this year?

If yes, then it makes sense to pose the question since the 'learners' (:rolleyes: @ the PC term) would already be aware of the context in which theyre asking the question - if not, then it's no an appropriate question to have asked.
 
Last edited:
And sadly I've yet to see a 6 page discussion spring up in a day over the real thing. Not saying this event was remotely OK by a long stretch, but we've become so used to reading about it in the news weekly that we're somewhat desensitised.
 
Playwright: Baby rape question unsuitable

Cape Town - Playwright Lara Foot has released a statement in reaction to the controversy surrounding a matric drama exam question relating to her play Tshepang, which deals with the rape of a baby in 2001.

Parents and educators voiced their shock after pupils were asked how to represent the rape of a baby symbolically, with the use of a broomstick and bread, The Witness reported on Wednesday.

According to the basic education department, the question relating to Foot's play was designed to assess their understanding of the concept of "action metaphor".

Inappropriate

Foot stated she was unsure of the particulars of the exam question, but said it would be "totally inappropriate and frankly appalling" if it was set as an unseen extract from the work, or if the play had not been studied or seen by the pupils.

Even if the play had been studied by the matric pupils, Foot pointed out that the question "is unsuitable and entirely problematic in that it appears to miss the stylistic choices of my play".

"We have performed Tshepang to 14 000 learners over the past 10 years with very successful and rewarding question and answer sessions afterwards. The exam question as it is presented indicates that there is a misinterpretation on the part those who set this question.

"Given the history and statistics of rape in this country, it is imperative that the matter is dealt with, but dealt with sensitively and responsibly."

Foot said the last time she had contact with the education department was six years ago, when she was approached to use the play as a set work.

In a statement on Wednesday, the basic education department said it would consider excluding the question if it becomes apparent that any pupils had been negatively affected by the question.

- News24

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Playwright-Baby-rape-question-unsuitable-20131127
 
Foot stated she was unsure of the particulars of the exam question, but said it would be "totally inappropriate and frankly appalling" if it was set as an unseen extract from the work, or if the play had not been studied or seen by the pupils.

That, in essence is what it's all about.

If the kids hadn't studied the play, and it was an "unseen" question, then it is totally inappropriate. If the play had been studied in depth and these things discussed in class, then it is possibly acceptable, however, I don't care whether it is Drama or not, I honestly feel that they overstepped their boundaries in setting this question.
 
Umalusi, the external quality assurance council that approved the exam, said dramatic arts was a subject that aimed to equip pupils by freeing their minds of bigotry and prejudice.

IMO, all that the inclusion of this in the curriculum and in the exam did, was desensitise children to the concept of rape.

In an extremely violent society like ours, that is the last thing you want to do!
 
Even if they had previously studied it, the question was still wrong....

Even if the play had been studied by the matric pupils, Foot pointed out that the question "is unsuitable and entirely problematic in that it appears to miss the stylistic choices of my play".
 
"We have performed Tshepang to 14 000 learners over the past 10 years with very successful and rewarding question and answer sessions afterwards. The exam question as it is presented indicates that there is a misinterpretation on the part those who set this question.
Not surprised.
 
this question was not about the rape itself. these students and many of the teachers, parents and public have over reacted. the question was for the students to set up the stage...........sound, lighting etc to give the audience maximum shock as to the actual scene itself. the pupils were not meant to re-enact the rape scene at all. it was all about the stage setup.
 
this question was not about the rape itself. these students and many of the teachers, parents and public have over reacted. the question was for the students to set up the stage...........sound, lighting etc to give the audience maximum shock as to the actual scene itself. the pupils were not meant to re-enact the rape scene at all. it was all about the stage setup.

Yes, to set up the scene in such a way that the equipment would invoke emotional feelings of viewers - all the same nonetheless. I know what many thought of the two items in question...

Back in the day when we still had a proper education system and effective government we were not subjected to this type of siht when we were in matric. Hell, in fact, many probably did not even know what rape was back then.

Where has this country gone to now that school children are taught about rape, need to reconstruct theatrical scenes and/or equipment that depict a baby's rape and invoke fear and other feelings with viewers.

Still BS, children need not be subjected to this at all.
 
Yes, to set up the scene in such a way that the equipment would invoke emotional feelings of viewers - all the same nonetheless. I know what many thought of the two items in question...

Back in the day when we still had a proper education system and effective government we were not subjected to this type of siht when we were in matric. Hell, in fact, many probably did not even know what rape was back then.

Where has this country gone to now that school children are taught about rape, need to reconstruct theatrical scenes and/or equipment that depict a baby's rape and invoke fear and other feelings with viewers.

Still BS, children need not be subjected to this at all.


house - this was not about teaching the kids about rape etc. it was about a specific play already set by a play write. the scene was taken from the book already. this book was about a specific rape case in 2001 this was NOT to teach the kids to rape or how a rape is actually carried out.

this whole thing has got way out of hand and been blown way out of proportion.
 
The question was inappropriate. Even the playwright herself has said so.
The marks for the question have already been withdrawn and all students will be credited for those 15 points.
Give it up Celine, you are beating a dead horse here.
 
house - this was not about teaching the kids about rape etc. it was about a specific play already set by a play write. the scene was taken from the book already. this book was about a specific rape case in 2001 this was NOT to teach the kids to rape or how a rape is actually carried out.

this whole thing has got way out of hand and been blown way out of proportion.

I understand that Celine, however, the question was totally out of line and unacceptable. Why did they not rather decide upon another more appropriate book and asked the children to setup another type of scene that would provoke feelings and emotions. Why did they have to decide upon a book dealing with the rape of a baby, and that to school children?

For me, it is all about the question and the book they felt was appropriate. It is not, especially not to school children, even matriculants.
 
ok, i got the mercury this week because our trivia quiz roll over question was going to come out of the mercury. it was a nice prize so i did it for our team.

this article caught my attention and going back, all i can say is the education department are lying. nowhere in the question does it ask the pupils to set up the stage.

1) why did the playwright choose to use the symbols of a loaf of bread to represent the baby and the boomstick as the raper?

and -

2) describe how you would get the actor portraying simon to perform line 9 to maxi,ise the horror of the rape for the audience.


where in that question does it ask for scene setting? they are trying to cover their fat a$$es as per usual.
 
Baby rape exam question out: Department

A question about baby rape in the matric drama exam will be excluded from the marking process, the basic education department said on Friday.

"The department of basic education does concede that parts of the question may have been perceived negatively by some learners, depending on their personal backgrounds," it said in a statement.

This came after a meeting between the examining panel responsible for setting the drama paper, the internal moderator, Umalusi, and provincial education departments on Wednesday and Thursday.

From a sample of scripts marked, there was no compelling evidence confirming that the question "adversely affected" the pupils' answers, but the department still decided to request Umalusi to consider excluding the question.

"The department of basic education has submitted a formal request to the quality assurance council [Umalusi] to consider a concession, where parts of the question that may have been perceived as offensive by some learners be excluded from the marking process and the marking guideline be adjusted to accommodate this concession.

"Umalusi has granted approval and the marking process across the country in dramatic arts will be administered in accordance with this amendment."

The compulsory question, based on Laura Foot Newton's play "Tshepang", required pupils to describe, using a broom handle and a loaf of bread, how child rape could be dramatically depicted on stage.


Source : Sapa /fg/th/jk
Date : 29 Nov 2013 11:12
 
:wtf: There are something seriously amiss in the gene pool of this country! How the freck can this be defended by anyone but brain dead morons (referring to education department)

:confused: ????????
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X