You are wrong in quite a few ways.
1) You are on the side that wants to help expand the role of government.
2) And to pay for that, you will steal the labour of other people and give it to them. Which is actually closer to indentured servitude than choosing to work.
3) Reasonable to someone who doesn't need to work I suppose. Your type of thinking is borderline causing an absolute humanitarian crisis in South Africa
6) Your right to healthcare comes at the cost of stealing money from other people.
7) Your right to free education comes at the cost of stealing money from other people.
8) You don't want to respect the autonomy of people who want to work though. If someone wants to go and get a haircut and you ban them from doing it, you are not respecting their body.
10) Diversity of what? Immutable characteristics like race and sex? If you mean race, then you are making the assumption that all people of a particular race are exactly the same. Ditto with sex.
12) False dichotomy. Those rights are not in conflict. And if you are now a worshipper of science, you can read here how there is no correlation between gun murders and gun ownership.
In keeping with Medium’s policy on duplicate content, this article has been migrated to Substack.
medium.com
I am on the side that respects individual freedom and individual choices, as well as the consequences of that freedom and the consequences of those choices.
I am on the side that treats people like adults who can make decisions for themselves.
I am on the side that observes the fact that politicians are self serving, whose interests only lie with getting elected. Hence why I don't want them to be in control over the entire economy. Deciding who gets healthcare and who has to pay for it. Deciding who is allowed to work and who is not. Deciding
I am on the side that understands that individuals are not representatives of their race and sex.