US Election 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
So they call him racist again , didn't work out the first time , won't work on the second .
Obama's crime ? Probably treason , or the usual laundry list of Democrat tactics which are illegal.
 
So they call him racist again , didn't work out the first time , won't work on the second .
Obama's crime ? Probably treason , or the usual laundry list of Democrat tactics which are illegal.

The top line of this graph will always have you seething with rage, won't it?

main-qimg-7e1bd0be597e1f7a43bf8d6e60d816f8


Also, the Republican total (without Donnie's numbers) in that Prison Sentences column is 34
The Democratic total is 1

But I get it, math is hard and projection is easy.
 
The top line of this graph will always have you seething with rage, won't it?
I am Jabulani's couz, umbhedo. The fact that Obama had 0 convictions, indictments and sentences is the absolute proof how he had all the state machinery working for him.

So, how do you like them apples?
 
I am Jabulani's couz, umbhedo. The fact that Obama had 0 convictions, indictments and sentences is the absolute proof how he had all the state machinery working for him.

So, how do you like them apples?

"umbhedo" is quality banter. :D
 
Democrats are better at using identity politics to hide their crimes , Obamacare.
All politicians are corrupt but I'm sure Trump will make you guys proud if he gets in again , cope harder.
 

The Barr-Shea motion to dismiss refers to my descriptions of the F.B.I.’s justification for not wanting to notify the new administration about the potential Flynn compromise as “vacillating from the potential compromise of a ‘counterintelligence’ investigation to the protection of a purported ‘criminal’ investigation.” But that “vacillation” has no bearing on whether the F.B.I. was justified in engaging in a voluntary interview with Mr. Flynn. It has no bearing on whether Mr. Flynn’s lies to the F.B.I. were material to its investigation into any links or coordination between Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election.

And perhaps more significant, it has no bearing on whether Mr. Flynn’s lies to the F.B.I. were material to the clear counterintelligence threat posed by the susceptible position Mr. Flynn put himself in when he told Mr. Pence and others in the new administration that he had not discussed the sanctions with Mr. Kislyak. The materiality is obvious.

In short, the report of my interview does not anywhere suggest that the F.B.I.’s interview of Mr. Flynn was unconstitutional, unlawful or not “tethered” to any legitimate counterintelligence purpose.

And this does not address the question I asked. How is the Flynn case material when the FBI were going to drop the case, but Strzok kept it open using the Logan Act? You cannot answer this because the answer is one you cannot believe.

This also does not address any of the other issues I posted over the weekend, but I really am bored with this and this is pointless. You also didn't mention which Q conspiracy theories / talking points I have been discussing, so like with most of your accusations, they should be taken with a pinch of salt.

The case has been dropped, so it is what it is. I am sorry this is happening to you.

David Attenborough: When cornered, the female Emjay emits a low-pitched 'adhominem' growl to ward off potential attackers. When the danger passes, she retreats to her den with a high-pitched 'Harumph' which can be heard for miles.

I used to think you are funny. Now you are just cringey.

Sky’s the limit when you don’t need to prove your assertions

Reminds me of Russiagate. It's also pretty interesting that you talk about proof yet you were completely sold by the entire Kavanaugh narrative which was distinctly lacking in proof. So, tell us more about your requirements for proof?
 
Last edited:
I am Jabulani's couz, umbhedo. The fact that Obama had 0 convictions, indictments and sentences is the absolute proof how he had all the state machinery working for him.

So, how do you like them apples?
Trump should have just stated what you did when asked what crime Obama had committed, and got the reporters off his back.
 
And I don't post on forums debasing my recently departed family members to make a point to strangers on the internet. I judge people based on their actions, and not some imaginary associations in my head.

Rent. Free.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X