US politics general thread

[buka001]

Well nobody made a wager on her being latino

From: https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...complicated/in9hXjiHUg8SBSSt9C9fJN/story.html

Point is irrespective of the outcome of her test, this is the level of dishonesty and lack of integrity Dear Leader is displaying, which the numerous acolytes have fallen head over heels to defend -

“And we will say, ‘I will give you $1 million to your favorite charity, paid for by Trump, if you take the test and it shows you’re an Indian,’ ”

As said by Trump in July.

I didn’t say that. You better read it again

- As said by Trump now.

 

[rietrot]

Another goal shifter.

What has any of this got to do with Trump lying about the $1million wager he put on the subject?

My post identified this aspect and this aspect only. How at yet another juncture, Trump's dishonesty and lack of integrity is exposed.

Please point out the exact words in any of my posts where I defend Warren whats her face? Please do.

I will wait.

That test is way to dodgy. She should just send it to one of this normal, 23 and me, type places.

 

[buka001]

That test is way to dodgy. She should just send it to one of this normal, 23 and me, type places.

And? Trump's dishonesty?

Nothing, as expected.

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

As said by Trump in July

Warren should honestly just STFU and stop digging the hole she put herself in deeper. Apparently we can all agree that she didn't meet the requirements of the wager in any case. Here's a defender of Trump that interprets the words as also implying she'd need to be nominated before she can even win the wager:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052179748036722688

So perhaps Trump saying "hey I didn't say that" is meant as "I didn't say exactly that, go read again"?

Meh, I honestly don't care.

 

[rietrot]

And? Trump's dishonesty?

Nothing, as expected.

What dishonesty? He should pay if she does a proper DNA test.

Was the wager only to do the test or to get a positive result?

Edit:seems like he didn't even make that wager but only indicated that he might for the 2020 campaign.

 

[scudsucker]

That test is way to dodgy. She should just send it to one of this normal, 23 and me, type places.

I was not aware of your expertise in analysing DNA. Perhaps you would expand on this statement, as you obviously are a subject matter expert in DNA analysis?

...
...

...










....
No? Ok, then. Your only option would be to STFU.

 

[rietrot]

I was not aware of your expertise in analysing DNA. Perhaps you would expand on this statement, as you obviously are a subject matter expert in DNA analysis?

...
...

...










....
No? Ok. Then.

Lol trying to be clever. Fail. I never claimed to be an expert in anything.

 

[Temujin]

Defending Trump's denial and lies on the $1 million wager?

<---takes dig at the oros man, gets called 'defending'

'on cue'

 

[rietrot]

'on cue'

Lol for some reason they think you are on the wrong team?

 

[scudsucker]

Lol trying to be clever. Fail. I never claimed to be an expert in anything.

Well, you appear to be certain that the test taken is "to dodgy".

Perhaps you'd like to substantiate that claim?

Or should we discard this nonsense as just more Rietrot trolling? I know where I'm putting my bets.

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

I was not aware of your expertise in analysing DNA. Perhaps you would expand on this statement, as you obviously are a subject matter expert in DNA analysis?

Does he need to be an expert to just simply read the article that broke the story?

It mentions:
- native american DNA source samples do not exist, they used samples from Mexico / Peru / Columbia instead
- they had to publish a correction due to a math error, apparently she's only 1/1,024th "native"
- a couple of sources have pointed out that 1/1,024th is even less than the typical white american should have in terms of "native" DNA

So she's whiter than most and 1/1,024th latino

None of that should sound dodgy unless one is an expert? LOL

 

[Seriously]

Yes agreed that she is on a sticky wicket and grandstanding on some poorly constructed platform.

However, what has that got to do with Trump lying and demonstrating his lack of integrity?

Trump is still an apprentice compared to Zuma. Never saw you complaining about our own Zumatard integrity?

 

[buka001]

Trump is still an apprentice compared to Zuma. Never saw you complaining about our own Zumatard integrity?

? Lol Despise Zuma worse than Trump. I complained where it counted by not voting for him or the covert ANC group called the EFF and its cohort of corrupt people.

 

[Temujin]

Lol for some reason they think you are on the wrong team?

I don't think they even read comments anymore, they just see handle and go all in

 

[Seriously]

? Lol Despise Zuma worse than Trump. I complained where it counted by not voting for him or the covert ANC group called the EFF and its cohort of corrupt people.

Ok. for you.

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

? Lol Despise Zuma worse than Trump. I complained where it counted by not voting for him or the covert ANC group called the EFF and its cohort of corrupt people.

Well ... technically you didn't vote for Trump either so ...

 

[scudsucker]

Does he need to be an expert to just simply read the article that broke the story?

It mentions:
- native american DNA source samples do not exist, they used samples from Mexico / Peru / Columbia instead
- they had to publish a correction due to a math error, apparently she's only 1/1,024th "native"
- a couple of sources have pointed out that 1/1,024th is even less than the typical white american should have in terms of "native" DNA

So she's whiter than most and 1/1,024th latino

None of that should sound dodgy unless one is an expert? LOL

I'm certain you, too, are an expert in DNA analysis, given your vast credentials in this specific area of science.

Perhaps you would elaborate for those of us who are less gifted in our aptitude for the scientific disciplines?

 

[buka001]

I don't think they even read comments anymore, they just see handle and go all in

Yeah. Like all of you who thought I was defending the Democrat, and "called me out" on racial constructs and identity politics, when all I was doing was pointing out a very obvious lie from Trump.

 

[buka001]

Well ... technically you didn't vote for Trump either so ...

And neither did you ...

 

[BBSA]

The U.S. government closed the 2018 fiscal year $779 billion in the red, its highest deficit in six years, as Republican-led tax cuts pinched revenues and expenses rose on a growing national debt, according to data released on Monday by the Treasury Department.

New government spending also expanded the federal deficit for the 12 months through September, the first full annual budget on the watch of U.S. President Donald Trump. It was the largest deficit since 2012.
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1MP28I