AfricanTech
Honorary Master
Why not? Where is the law or written rule demanding it?
Have you led large groups of people who are compelled to adhere to your instructions by virtue of your position?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Why not? Where is the law or written rule demanding it?
Which was exactly my point to begin with..... he does not have the capacity to be responsible for all the ludacrious things he gets accused of. He's a troll that hacked the system nothing more.The point is 'he didn't do it on his own'
Does not apply, there is a difference between "should not" and "not allowed to". The former is an advisement and the latter is actually enforceable.Have you led large groups of people who are compelled to adhere to your instructions by virtue of your position?
Where?*Laughs in censorship*
Worst.... comedian... ever.The other thing about stupid people is they tend to think bad jokes are people being completely 100% serious......
This has been true for the last 1000 years at least. It's all recorded, written down on some obscure documents somewhere.The internet has revolutionised documentation of history. It's all archived somewhere for all to search and read - unedited.
Some people who think you need the internet for mountains of inane but official garbage should read through a few years of colonial era news papers.....This has been true for the last 1000 years at least. It's all recorded, written down on some obscure documents somewhere.
All the fake news just makes it worse not better.
Written down by whom? Archived where? Accessed through what and by whom?This has been true for the last 1000 years at least. It's all recorded, written down on some obscure documents somewhere.
All the fake news just makes it worse not better.
Now you are not even trying anymore....Written down by whom? Archived where? Accessed through what and by whom?
Trump was a Republican that managed to p*ss off the military. On top of this, his own VP stepped away from him at the end. He was never going to be a dictator.
The rabid mob on the 6th of soccer moms, neckbeards, a viking, conspiracy theorists, looters and odd militia were never going to install a dictatorship on his behalf either, they would've been slaughtered by the military.
capacity isn't material to determining responsibility. being incapable of driving doesn't mean you can't crash a car, and arguing that as a defence wouldn't work. if anything, Trump's lack of consideration for the impact of the position and his reckless and consistent abuse of it highlights precisely why he shouldn't have had the job.Which was exactly my point to begin with..... he does not have the capacity to be responsible for all the ludacrious things he gets accused of. He's a troll that hacked the system nothing more.
A very large verify of authors, mostly first hand accounts.Written down by whom? Archived where? Accessed through what and by whom?
what i mean is that anyone who knew anything of his business career between, say, 1992 and 2008 was aware that he was in no way capable of executing in the role. there's never being a single piece of evidence that you could hang a hope on. and his consistent criminality over the same period, his complete lack of ethical standards, his gaming of every law he could, gave no-one any right to believe that he would adhere to standards suddenly on taking office.none of which makes him any less venal, disgusting, or destructive. it just highlights that there was no plan . which is what anyone who was aware of his business career already knew.
Erm, no. Unless he somehow managed to time travel. That divisiveness started a bit before Trump, the stage was set well before he came into the picture. It's amazing he could build a campaign on "Drain the swamp", considering what that swamp is, if it only started with him.He was an incredibly divisive president. When in recent history has the US ever been this divided?
The rioters and looters deserve to be blamed for what they did, but it would be silly to absolve Trump of all blame. The environment they live in has a big influence on the way people behave.
At the rate unpopular and sensitive stuff is being removed, documents were shredded, at best some of those would be extremely wild guesses. I was shaking my head again at the FISA issue the other day.The internet has revolutionised documentation of history. It's all archived somewhere for all to search and read - unedited.
Also refer to the FISA warrants and Obama ... then.When you are POTUS you don't have that luxury (refer Thabo the Aids denialist for a local example)
I'm more than happy with that. But it needs to be applied uniformly then, not depending on whose party flag you fly, or as some tend to do, define it so that it absolves favourites.edit: and none of which dilutes the incitement charge. "I meant some other thing to happen" is not a recognised defence. people are usually held accountable for the predictable consequences of their actions
Trump just happened to be a useful idiot to blame things on, to deflect from the underlying issues. Those issues where used against him even before he took office. He proved the media wrong. How dare he do it.
Lol. Is that a cop out?Now you are not even trying anymore....
My point is that nowadays, things don't happen in secrecy anymore. History unfolds before our eyes, compared to 1000 years ago when only select few were privy to such information and transferred it to scrolls and such. Digitising scrolls and books doesn't change content.A very large verify of authors, mostly first hand accounts.
Throughout the world, many original sources have even been digitized and copied, mostly available in libraries and museums.
It is a statement of dismay at your lack of proper attempt and slide into mediocre trolling.Lol. Is that a cop out?
Now you're projecting. Isn't that what you've been doing the whole morning?It is a statement of dismay at your lack of proper attempt and slide into mediocre trolling.
I strongly suspect you are better than that.