DrJohnZoidberg
Honorary Master
My bigger problem is sticking with 10 year old hardware.
I replace my hardware every 5 years at least.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
My bigger problem is sticking with 10 year old hardware.
Yeah, but I mean from a business perspective. If the company I work for didn't replace hardware on a bi-yearly basis we'd fall terribly behind and it would affect our bottom line.I replace my hardware every 5 years at least.
Yeah, but I mean from a business perspective. If the company I work for didn't replace hardware on a bi-yearly basis we'd fall terribly behind and it would affect our bottom line.
What's hugely interesting to me is that a couple of years back you would have tried to figure out why the box was slowing down, now you just replace it?Ye, I know what you mean. We still have 2 XP boxes at our office. They are terribly slow but won't have to deal with them much longer, replacing them with new Windows 8 machines which only cost around 4.5k each.
What's hugely interesting to me is that a couple of years back you would have tried to figure out why the box was slowing down, now you just replace it?
Without AV software and internet access, my 3 XP vbox machines outperform 2 w8 machines I've been lumped with.
Still cannot see why people would willingly want to use a 12 year old operating system.
WinXP also has tends to "rot" a lot quicker than Win7/8 machines. I've done fresh installs a few times on the XP boxes while the Win7 boxes are still fine.
Ye, I know what you mean. We still have 2 XP boxes at our office. They are terribly slow but won't have to deal with them much longer, replacing them with new Windows 8 machines which only cost around 4.5k each.
I replace my hardware every 5 years at least.
My bigger problem is sticking with 10 year old hardware.
You evidently haven't run XP without AV - AV causes more rot than you may ever realise.WinXP also has tends to "rot" a lot quicker than Win7/8 machines. I've done fresh installs a few times on the XP boxes while the Win7 boxes are still fine.
Because it works?
For me, with the software I regularly use and my own programs, XP works, and works a helluva lot better than Win7 with its ghastly file manager, not mentioning that cockup called Win8. I have XP running on my i5 and my i7, and a number of older machines.
So you are running a Ferrari with a Beetle engine, nice.
No. He's using 2005 Ferrari engine management software on his 2013 Ferrari engine. The 2013 version has some cool features which he does not need nor want because they reduce his productivity, and he already has the older version which works well enough for his purpose, so he saved some money too.
I'm pretty sure his i5 and i7 laptops would've come with either Win 7 or 8 licenses so he isn't saving anything and he's just too lazy to learn the new interface that is far more efficient if you learn to use it properly.
o not update their hardware every six months because its not necessary, embedded processors have a life cycle of 10-15 years+
I have a total investment of around R60k of tools that are working, in good condition, and haven't been updated by the manufacturer, and I cannot make them work with Win7 due to the idiotic nature of that OS.