Viking wants a fast Droid - Beep Beep

BTW i have a friend who has an A24 - his phone was slow but decent before it updated to One UI7 - after the update it has become super slow and to me frustratingly so when trying to do anything on it - it seems like some of these phones need a reset and then clean update to remain at their normal speeds - but i can understand why the A25 is frustrating you so much - for certain tasks even a newly setup A06 is quicker
 
Exactly, They still cant beat that 30 years later. So my fact still stands, IMPOSSIPLE!
IMPOSSIPLE maybe, but definitely possible.

The Aston Martin Valkyrie Is The World's Fastest-Accelerating Naturally Aspirated Car
Aston Martin Valkyrie Statistics
0 to 60 MPH: 2.2 seconds
Top Speed: 250 MPH (claimed)
Power: 1160 HP
Production Years: 2021 to present
 
View attachment 1837741
So for only R2.5k more you get double the performance with 2 less cores.

respectfully ..... you are looking only at single core scores - the iphone is soundly beaten in multicore scores as per your own link - so the number of cores does play a role in the iphone being beaten BUT in the single core scores your point about the number of cores makes absolutely zero sense

iphone crap.png
 
the S24SE can be had for around R12k for the 256GB version (around R10k to R11k for the 128GB) and its really worth that kind of money because it gives you 90% of the hardware of the S24 and S24+ and once you update to One Ui7 around 97 to 98% of the identical software

between the Samsung and the Poco X series i would consider the Sammie - it just does a little more, but if you were looking at the Poco F series then its no contest i would just get the Poco F series
So my budget was R4000. Now I am at R8000. Now you want me to go another 4K above that.

On what planet do you people live?
 
you are looking only at single core scores - the iphone is soundly beaten in multicore scores as per your own link - so the number of cores does play a role in the iphone being beaten

View attachment 1837757
Also is that "benchmark" done in 2025, with a phone that has aged for 5 years or whatever it is. The Sheep is really gullible.

I'll try an iPhone when I am rich and can only afford the latest, give or take a year.
 
So my budget was R4000. Now I am at R8000. Now you want me to go another 4K above that.

On what planet do you people live?

i was in the exact same position - i was considering the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ at R10999 and then saw the S24SE at R14449 on a black Friday special (bundled with a set of Buds 3 earbuds which now goes for R4000 at the Samsung shop when i last checked) - given the differences in performance and features i honestly did not regret the "swivel" (i initially was of the mind that i would not ever get a Samsung phone because they were overpriced to my mind) - sometimes it does land up better to go that one step up because the S24SE is as close as you can get to the rest of the S series besides the Ultra which still has a bit extra in the camera's and the S-Pen

you would be able to keep the stronger phone for longer - it gets around 7 generations of guaranteed updates

EDIT : sorry i posted without checking actual speeds - see my post below for my retraction
 
Last edited:
Takealot currently has the S24 FE on special for R9999 for the 128gb variant, the Poco is better specs wise by far but Samsung does have some nice extra software like Samsung Dex which can be useful depending on use case.

 
okay - i just went to GSMArena and checked and scratch whatever i said above - performance wise the X7 pro and the S24FE are identical - maybe the AI and Dex are better on the Sammie software wise, but if you don't want to use those then its a moot point and i reckon its not a bad idea sticking to the Poco - its going to be a superfast phone compared to the A25 (as is the S24FE but thats more expensive so nothing wrong with sticking with the cheaper alternative)

have to admit when i am wrong to be fair
 
This is a good alternative, I'm just not sure if the spec difference is worth the extra.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B-1
okay - i just went to GSMArena and checked and scratch whatever i said above - performance wise the X7 pro and the S24FE are identical - maybe the AI and Dex are better on the Sammie software wise, but if you don't want to use those then its a moot point and i reckon its not a bad idea sticking to the Poco - its going to be a superfast phone compared to the A25 (as is the S24FE but thats more expensive so nothing wrong with sticking with the cheaper alternative)

have to admit when i am wrong to be fair
I looked at the S25FE. Looks like a nice phone. As you said, not sure if the better camera is worth the difference. Photos are secondary to me and only there to take photos of coffee.

Also I really don't like the Samsung OS if it is the same as the A25 OS.
 
This is a good alternative, I'm just not sure if the spec difference is worth the extra.
It's definitely worth getting a snapdragon processor if you want to do serious emulation like Switch or winlator (as only snapdragons have decent drivers) otherwise probably not much difference in day to day use.
 
I looked at the S25FE. Looks like a nice phone. As you said, not sure if the better camera is worth the difference. Photos are secondary to me and only there to take photos of coffee.

Also I really don't like the Samsung OS if it is the same as the A25 OS.

thats probably a typo and you mean the S24FE - since the S25FE is only being launched in the next two or three months and its going to probably launch at around R16k to R17k ..... just pointing it out 😉
 
respectfully ..... you are looking only at single core scores - the iphone is soundly beaten in multicore scores as per your own link - so the number of cores does play a role in the iphone being beaten BUT in the single core scores your point about the number of cores makes absolutely zero sense

View attachment 1837757
It's a smartphone. Single core performance is much more important in term of responsiveness and longevity.
 
How can it be a 512GB ROM?
Traditionally ROM was read only because of its nature, apart from UV erasable and so on. When it became possible to reprogram ROMs it became acceptable to refer to everything that couldn't simply be overwritten and was primarily used for reading as ROM. Modern flash memory is still the same thing where data is erased first before it can be written so it's still referred to as ROM.

It only becomes confusing when some refer to storage as RAM.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X