Necuno
Court Jester
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
- Messages
- 58,566
- Reaction score
- 3,437
Whilst I haven't received a warning I intend cancelling on principle - no longer worth spending the extra money.
As would any logical thinking person do.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Whilst I haven't received a warning I intend cancelling on principle - no longer worth spending the extra money.
Why does the mention someone made about this happening after the MyBB piracy survey keep popping into my head. It sure as all poop seems very, very perfectly timed hey ..... anything you feel like sharing MyBB? I mean if Google ( *spit* ) can rule the roost here, why not Mweb/Naspers too![]()
I think it will make zero difference to Mweb - remember it's Naspers which enjoys (thanks to Tencent investment) huge amounts of cash. As such nothing will come out of it and you are right, SA consumers will remain complacent and not move. If Mweb was a UK or German company pulling a stunt like this, they would be already answering to a consumer council and face heavy fines. Something neither ICASA or ISPA will enforce in SA.
Naspers pressure to prevent piracy on their own networks?
Naspers pressure to prevent piracy on their own networks?
It very well may be, but if that is the case it would be a very 'African' way of doing it.
This is not the way to prevent piracy. It will only amount to a statement of: "We will allow you to pirate up to 1TB" after that we will attempt to reduce your Internet speeds in order to ensure that you do not pirate 'That Much' anymore.
The best way to fight and prevent piracy (and this is not even a guarantee you will succeed in it) is to monitor users reaching certain bandwidth limits. Spy on them and see what they are downloading. If it is music and videos, report them and all their personal identifiable information, as well as full disclosure of what when and how they downloaded the content to licensing companies and institutions such as SAFACT.
Criminal prosecution will not work in SA, but these companies can indeed institute civil actions, which will leave pirates with large losses of income, repossessed properties, huge fines and much more.
This will be a better route. Somehow, I do not think it has anything to do with piracy.
Idiocy of the month award.
What the hell are you smoking.
The best way to fight and prevent piracy (and this is not even a guarantee you will succeed in it) is to monitor users reaching certain bandwidth limits. Spy on them and see what they are downloading. If it is music and videos, report them and all their personal identifiable information, as well as full disclosure of what when and how they downloaded the content to licensing companies and institutions such as SAFACT.
Idiocy of the month award.
What the hell are you smoking.
I was also a bit confused, must be a joke.
Say hypothetically I was such a user... hitting a threshold.... and then my ISP decides to monitor exactly what content I download... and then pass on my details to SAFACT/whoever... who then file civil suits against me....
Oh, don't worry, I wouldn't be broke... because I'd be suing said ISP for a pretty penny - yes, I could, because they are not allowed to monitor what you download without a court order.
Legally, if an ISP identifies someone committing an offence on their networks they have a legal obligation to report it to authorities. Go read your contracts and you will find more than enough clauses where you agree to them reporting your activities and dishing out your personal identifiable information to the relevant authorities.
This is a very real possibility and a practical one as well. I know it has happened before. I know of almost all SP's who at some point reported suspicious activities to police, but in very few where police able to act.
Legally, if an ISP identifies someone committing an offence on their networks they have a legal obligation to report it to authorities. Go read your contracts and you will find more than enough clauses where you agree to them reporting your activities and dishing out your personal identifiable information to the relevant authorities. You have no leg to stand on if this happens and will not be able to sue anything or one.
This is a very real possibility and a practical one as well. I know it has happened before. I know of almost all SP's who at some point reported suspicious activities to police, but in very few were police able to act.
The only best way to prevent piracy is to make content easily available at reasonable prices. End of story.
Yes, fair enough, but they'd have to prove it.
They cannot prove it without monitoring exactly what I download/upload.
They cannot, legally, do that, without a court order.
If they do it, then report me, the case will get thrown out because the evidence was obtained illegally.
I think you should get that contract out again. They have full rights to monitor any activity that occurs on their network. They have your permission for that.
MWEB has no obligation to monitor content of any materials distributed or accessed using the IP Services. However, MWEB may monitor content of any such materials as necessary to comply with applicable laws, regulations or other governmental or judicial requests; or to protect the MWEB network and its customers.
You should acquaint yourself with the Interception of Telecommunications Act. Unless there is a court order, the customer needs to allow them in writing, for each occasion on which they intend to intercept (monitor) any activity.
I'm not with Mweb, but will quote their paragraph:
As above, they require a court order. A company's "legal policy" cannot go against what the law says.
I also checked out that "contract" that you sign with Mweb... and no, nothing of any sort is being agreed to.
This.
Oh really? WTF did I get a letter then?
In that case the ISP should indicate the acceptable usage limit. This will assist the user to make an informed decision.