Toxxyc
Executive Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 5,502
- Reaction score
- 3,662
And that's exactly this. I've converted a bunch of JW fans before. Asking them why they buy JW, they give a list of answers. I offer them other options at a lower price. When I get the "it's smooth" I tend to pour them a Dahlwhinnie 15YO (that's mostly where my 1 litre bottle went to), and then tell them it's half the price as the Blue. JW isn't bad. Far from it. It's just a bit bland. Same light I see Glenfiddich 12YO these days. The last bottle or two I had was good. Great, even. But bland. Missing a lot of the notes I learned to love in a good Scotch.I don't imagine anyone truly wants to pay around R2k for a bottle of "bland" though
I'm going to say something shocking. Unless you hate the banana note (I don't like banana so it's difficult for me to even say this) in Jack Daniels their whisky is very comparable to these Bourbons. JD old no 7 is the most different but JD Rye and Single Barrel are both quite good.
I'll back you up on this one. When I poured myself a Maker's Mark the other day, the first thing I noted was "damn, this smells very, VERY much like cheap old Jack Daniels. In fact, one of the mentions I had in the Maker's Mark (and the Maker's 46) is that they tasted a tiny bit "thin", which is something I never picked up with JD No7. Gentleman Jack is better, Single Barrel as well. I don't know why, but I pick it up in these two bourbons. Blanton's Gold doesn't have it either. It's way creamier. Perhaps something to do with the filtering? I honestly don't know.
I still prefer the Maker's Mark and the Maker's 46 though. I've still got to give Knob Creek a try. Looking forward to that one, but keeping it for a more special occasion to open.




