This is probably a symptom of the times. Many black people during apartheid became "Peter", "John", "Moses" etc. Now that apartheid is with us again in the form of AA and BEE, should we be surprised that white people are adopting black names.
This is probably a symptom of the times. Many black people during apartheid became "Peter", "John", "Moses" etc. Now that apartheid is with us again in the form of AA and BEE, should we be surprised that white people are adopting black names.
??? Um RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ring a bell?Skeptik, Please enlighten me how AA and BEE are similar to apartheid.
Skeptik, Please enlighten me how AA and BEE are similar to apartheid.
??? Um RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ring a bell?
(even the legislation looks the same - and if they continue their time will come, just like the previous government.)
What is your thought...
A white south african marries a black south african... are their children PDIs? Do they qualify for BEE and AA?
Yes they qualify for AA if they are part of these groups, non-white, female, disabled or from the rural areas. This is not just my opinion, it's the Employment Equity Act of SA.What is your thought...
A white south african marries a black south african... are their children PDIs? Do they qualify for BEE and AA?
Aaaaw - c'mon.The fact that you are not part of the targeted groups does not mean you are being discrimnated against (at least it's not based on your race).
Similarly your mother/sister/wife can 'benefit' from you being unable to support your family due to AA. Wow.Either way you can still benefit from AA through the other groups that are the targeted, i.e your mother, sister or wife if you happen to be a perfectly abled white male.
What is your thought...
A white south african marries a black south african... are their children PDIs? Do they qualify for BEE and AA?
??? Um RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ring a bell?
(even the legislation looks the same - and if they continue their time will come, just like the previous government.)
AA didn't even work in America where the 'disadvantaged' groups is 10% of the population. How will it work where the disadvantaged is 90% of the population. If the 90% were still educated, then yes, but as it stands education doesn't seem to be a priority, as government is too busy thinking of ways to lower the standards, so that everybody can pass. News24 has a nice article about the maths pass rate since 1994.
Yes they qualify for AA if they are part of these groups, non-white, female, disabled or from the rural areas. This is not just my opinion, it's the Employment Equity Act of SA.
In that case then the kid will be resident in the US or will not really be queeing for an AA job. what's your point?despite the fact that the white mother is the child of an oil tycoon in the US who also owns large tracts of land in Limpopo...
The "Old Boy's Network" for a example. Such a network exists where people with power in organizations are able to and readily promote, and support one another as well as others who are close to them within the organization. Such a network goes against, the principles of a true 'meritocracy'.
Old Boys' Network? Not here, or anywhere close. Percentages of percentages. AA and BEE has resulted in people not qualified for their positions. Dead wood. What sane ceo or group of shareholders wants "directed by law." (What are the positive or negative impacts of this on the economy and the creation of jobs?)You guys are disingenuously trying to deflect or downplay the role of past and current institutional discrimination.
There are numerous examples that show ways in which employees get hired based on non-merit criteria. The "Old Boy's Network" for a example. Such a network exists where people with power in organizations are able to and readily promote, and support one another as well as others who are close to them within the organization. Such a network goes against, the principles of a true 'meritocracy'. Nobody from outside the "Old Boy's Network" can get promoted 'from within' a company unless the job is clearly designated for AA.
If you dispute the existence of such a network then you are either not living in SA or it is so hard for you to see it because you are part of it.
Hey, that's my argument that you are using! How can we do away with affirmative action when the 10% controls 90% of the economy and owns 90%of the land (such an important factor of production)?