Wikileaks releases pager intercepts from 9/11

I don't get the article though.

Most have nothing to do with the events themselves.

So WTF is the point? Do we really care if someone told someone else to turn off the iron :D
 
Here you go bud::erm:
2) No plane hit the Pentagon on September 11. Instead, it was a missile fired by elements “from inside the American state apparatus.”

Conspiracy theorists making this claim ignore several facts:

• The remains of the bodies of the crew and passengers of American Airlines flight 77 were found at the Pentagon crash site, and positively identified by DNA.

• The flight’s black boxes were also recovered at the site.

• Numerous eyewitnesses saw the plane strike the Pentagon. Some saw passengers through the plane’s windows. Missiles don’t have windows or carry passengers.

• Numerous photographs show airplane debris at the crash site, as was also witnessed by survivors and rescue personnel. See sections 4:57 to 6:00 of the “911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77” video for pictures of airliner debris.

• For more information, see “Did a Plane Hit the Pentagon?” and Popular Mechanics, part 6.

Links:
http://www.america.gov/st/webchat-english/2009/May/20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355.html
 
Last edited:
All good boys, but I see no plane, be it seats, wings, fuselage. If the plane hit the building then surely the wing would have hit it as well? Yet there is no damage to the left and right of the "hole"? Also, why did WTC7 collapse on its own? It was not hit by a plane. As to Obama standing for truth and justice etc. LOL
 
Tomasz-London said:
All good boys, but I see no plane, be it seats, wings, fuselage. If the plane hit the building then surely the wing would have hit it as well? Yet there is no damage to the left and right of the "hole"? Also, why did WTC7 collapse on its own? It was not hit by a plane. As to Obama standing for truth and justice etc. LOL
Click to expand...


Were u expecting to see an imprint of Wile E Coyote against the wall?

Work out what the pentagon walls are made of. And what the planes wings are made of.
Then work out what speed the plane was traveling at at impact.

Better yet, go jump off a tall building and spread your arms out wide, see what kinda mark you leave.
 
alf101 said:
Were u expecting to see an imprint of Wile E Coyote against the wall?

Work out what the pentagon walls are made of. And what the planes wings are made of.
Then work out what speed the plane was traveling at at impact.

Better yet, go jump off a tall building and spread your arms out wide, see what kinda mark you leave.
Click to expand...

Should the windows above, and to the sides of the hole be broken, or would it stay intact because of the wall structure? Just asking as it would make sense that it would at least be cracked or partially broken, but it looks untouched in the videos/pictures I could find.
 
alf101 said:
Were u expecting to see an imprint of Wile E Coyote against the wall?

Work out what the pentagon walls are made of. And what the planes wings are made of.
Then work out what speed the plane was traveling at at impact.

Better yet, go jump off a tall building and spread your arms out wide, see what kinda mark you leave.
Click to expand...

No, but I was expecting some damage to the left and right of the hole, and yet there is none. I suggest you do some more research, and from other sources than the US Federal Guavamint website. And as to your last sentence :(
 
The only two 9/11 conspiracies that are interesting are the controlled demolition and world trade 7's collapse. This is mostly from a physics point of view and the fact that despite all the appeals an independent study has never been carried out on their plausibility. In science we're suppose to consider all options and data and employ occam's razor. You're not supposed to take the least implausible scenario of total collapse that doesn't involve third party demolitions and state that to be a "proof". Very shabby and does reek of some kind of agensa by N.I.S.T.
 
Tomasz-London said:
No, but I was expecting some damage to the left and right of the hole, and yet there is none. I suggest you do some more research, and from other sources than the US Federal Guavamint website. And as to your last sentence :(
Click to expand...

Why would there be damage to the left and right of the hole? :confused:
 
Tomasz-London said:
No, but I was expecting some damage to the left and right of the hole, and yet there is none. I suggest you do some more research, and from other sources than the US Federal Guavamint website. And as to your last sentence :(
Click to expand...

What qualifications do you hold as far as damage assesment?

The answer is most likely the same as to the question:
Do any of these conspiracy ideas add up?

:cool:
 
Last edited:
killadoob said:
I don't get the article though.

Most have nothing to do with the events themselves.

So WTF is the point? Do we really care if someone told someone else to turn off the iron :D
Click to expand...

From M&G
GLOBAL WHISTLE-BLOWING WEBSITE SHUT DOWN
DAVID LEIGH AND JONATHAN FRANKLIN - Feb 23 2008 08:30

A secretive Swiss bank landed an apparently novel censorship blow against the internet this week. Anyone who tried to call up Wikileaks.org, a global website devoted to publicising leaked documents, found themselves frustrated. The site simply wasn't there any more.


It backfired. (mine)

...The injunction blew up a gale of debate about internet freedom, and sprayed the bank's secret documents all over the net. It has also thrust into prominence an obscure group of dreamers and programmers that wants to provide what it calls an "untraceable and uncensorable" leaking machine, to be used by dissidents worldwide.
Click to expand...

Heh, heh, heh. Go! Wikileaks. Go!
 
My chirp. It was 19 religiously guided nut0jobs that hijacked the three planes and crashed them into the buildings. On the orders of a towel head named Osama ben laden, may he have a long and painful death, apart from his family and friends at the hands of a flesh eating virus.
 
Interesting, I was watching a new DVD "man on wire" from the BBC about a Frenchman who walked a wire between the two towers in the 1970's and you can see the footage of the towers being built. Solid stuff indeed. Makes you wonder...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X