I've checked out the Powerpack page several times and I can't for the life of me work out how my life would be improved by any of that.The problem with Alfred is they a bit daft, the tool is worthless in its free form, 99% of its power comes from the paid version, for which there is no trial.
I had downloaded a paid version from a 3rd part source and only then decided it was worth paying for. Like what’s the point in a free version that completely disables to only feature that would make people consider buying it…
The search shortcuts (e.g. "yt xyz" -> "xyz" search on YouTube) are available in the free version. Clipboard history freaks me out because I'm copying license keys and client credentials throughout the day every day. macOS already has a text expander built in. I use Spotify so not sure about that music stuff. While I think Finder is fairly lousy compared to File Explorer, I'm sceptical that replacing it with a search bar is a step forward. I'm quite happy to launch Terminal before using it. I don't use 1Password. The workflows look excessive for my needs. All I want from the upcoming Shortcuts is to generate a bunch of spaces and populate them with the apps I use at the start of every day, with a single shortcut. That would be great. So I dunno about this Alfred stuff.
While I can appreciate the usefulness of such hectic automations, my simple work life doesn't require all that on my computer. I'm a web developer - my stuff happens in the cloud. My automations and scripts are already in place, for stuff like quickly setting up a blank site or optimising PHP and the firewall, monitoring uptime and performance, and so on.I’m not holding my breath on what Shortcuts might have to offer. Whilst it will no doubt make basic automation much more viable, and will allow some scope for more advanced automation, given how it will subsume Automator eventually, there is a day and night difference between what Automator offers straight out if the box (in the absence of AppleScript/other scripting), and what the apps I mention, particularly KM bring to the party.
That said, Shortcuts will undoubtedly overlap to some extent with what the others offer at a basic level, but would be suprised if it allows for more advanced functionality. Of course, scripting language incorporation will change that, but it is quite remarkable what can be done via KM, Hazel, Alfred without having to go that route. KM conflict palettes, for example — the greatest thing since sliced bread, imo!! And when you do use scripts, it ramps up exponentially.
But regardless, does make sense to wait a few months to see what the Mac version of Shortcuts offers, and then decide from there. Maybe Apple gets serious about automation on the Mac again, and blows it out of the water!

