South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
![]()
Sony. Pure comedy gold,
While I still hope that the deal goes through, mainly because I hold Activision stock, I have come to terms with it flopping and me holding onto some Activision bags in the near future. Something about what's happening now led me to believe that it's pretty much over, but honestly the articles and tweets I read to try make sense of it all were confusing and I don't understand a lot of the legal mambojambo.
In saying that, I hope it drags on for a few days so we can get some juicy deets out of this courtcase. I find that quite exciting.


(Please don't say Starfield


)Sony. Pure comedy gold,
Which is really odd... what about the team that develops Minecraft?
They make a version for PS and would need info about the console.What about them?
They make a version for PS and would need info about the console.
They make a version for PS and would need info about the console.
There's a lot of good stuff in that verge timeline.
There's a lot of good stuff in that verge timeline.
Seems like the FTC is bought and paid for by Sony. Their line of questioning is constantly whether x or y would be coming to PS. Judge is having none of it.
Spencer says they've been forced to do deals like this because Sony is constantly buying exclusivity from 3rd parties, which excludes them from competing as third placed in the console race.
The arguments made by the FTC really don't look very convincing. Especially since they're not addressing why PS (as first place) is allowed exclusivity but MS (in third place) isn't...
Well that is just not cricket. Don't let the developers have access to the system and them cry foul about getting an inferior version.
What I can't understand is why will Jim Ryan testify in this case? Of course $ony is going to say the acquisition is bad.
Why would they try to protect $ony?
This all seems crazy to me, but Phil did a great job explaining to the FTC lawyer the difference in buying exclusivity and an acquisition for $70 billion.
I can't see how this deal is not going through.
I cant put it past them by looking at Final Fantasy, Silent hill 2 and and....
Square Enix (SE) has already said how these deals come to pass. They offer the games to all platforms and take the best deal. Sony provides them with more money and engineer support, nothing has ever stopped MS from forking out more to get a deal. Why do you guys conveniently forget that MS bought timed exclusivity for Tomb Raider from SE? SE probably lost a ton of money on it and soured their relationship though
Not saying they are the good guys in that aspect, I mean Microsoft was the 1st to buy exclusive rights in CoD back in the day for example.
That being said when Microsft buys exclusive rights you can still get it on PC. When Sony does it, its console only <-- and that is the part I see as a negative.
It's not? It comes to PC after a while. For Sony PS is their main platform, so it makes sense to prioritise that in a deal.