LazyLion
King of de Jungle
I'm in the reverse situation, we WANT to look after my parents as my mom has Alzheimer's and dad is struggling to cope, but they are refusing to sell their house and move in with us or to go to a home.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
This was my feeling as well until I got to this :
This is not something I have to deal with, right now as it stands I would look after my folks no matter what, if the above were the case I may need to rethink.
My parents are both gone but have my father-in-law living with me.
Even after my wife passed there was no question I would keep looking after him.
(he has a small pension but would not be able to support himself)
I do not see it as a liability but as an honor being able to take care of him.
*** man. Everyone's situation is different.
Just because you had a pleasant relationship with your parents, doesn't mean everyone else did.
In high school, I preferred staying in at the hostel over weekends having nothing to do other than study, rather than go home and face the toxicity at home, because it was detrimental to my will to live, and my safety.
There is NO excuse. Zero, you can try and justify it all you want. Even if you disliked your father or mother to such a degree that it borders on hate. You still have an obligation to at least make sure they are cared for in a home or something even if you don't want to see them. As much as you might hate them, you being able to attend School and staying in the hostel was because of your folks. They raised you even if they were horrible at it. There is NO EXCUSE!
Unless they are actually dragging you down as well. People with gambling and substance abuse issues are not actually better off with financial support.
Would you choose to support your abusive parents over giving your own kids a better chance in life ?
No one is telling you how to live your life. And one day your kids might be required to look after you no matter how well you manage your finances. I think it's a damn shame if you abandon your folks no matter what they did that put them in that situation. They raised you and cared for you a minimum of lets say 16 years. The least you can do is repay them.
Back in the 80's my mother emptied my brothers and my Post Office savings account so they could go and party......... :erm:
Unless they are actually dragging you down as well. People with gambling and substance abuse issues are not actually better off with financial support.
Would you choose to support your abusive parents over giving your own kids a better chance in life ?
That is the sentiment that I have to disagree with though. Parents choose to "burden" themselves with children. The child has no choice in the matter and is reliant on the parents to keep them alive into adulthood. The parents made that choice and knew what they were getting themselves into when they decided to have a kid.
There is no Repayment obligation for that.
The repayment obligation is around the emotional bonding and loving support they give you as you grow up. You feel you should support your parents because they are WORTH supporting. They supported you more than financially growing up, so you have a bond there that is more than the money they invested in you as you grew.
But you cannot hold everyone else to that standard.
What happens if a kid was clothed, fed, and educated, but also abused or beaten every time mom and dad got into a drunken argument?
What if the parents shipped their child off to boarding school, not because they thought the environment would be best for the child, but because the child was a nuisance in their lives and boarding school was an easy way to put them out of sight for a large portion of their time?
Remembering that a parent signs up for a non-refundable, non-returnable, 0% financial return investment when they choose to have a child. There is however a 1000000000% return on emotional investment. And the emotion that a parent invests can be negative. So if a parent fails to invest that emotion in their children, they cannot be surprised when those children are not emotionally invested in them later in life.
I agree 100% with this and to add, my childhood was horrible! Not growing up with your parents (I grew up with my grandparents) is one of those investments. I will never know whether my parents in fact planned to have me since they will never tell me. My grandmother now has Alzheimer's and my grandfather is dead./snip
I think my last post explains exactly how I feel about this: "They decided to have kids" argument. You are alive and living a successful live because they had you. Maybe it should have been someone else who actually respected their folks and was thankful they decided to have them instead of self centred people like yourself.
That is where your "good" upbringing is clouding your eyes. You cannot separate, Alive because of your parents, and successful because of your parents, some people are successful in spite of their parents. I am not saying this is me, I am simply playing devils advocate here because I can see both sides of the fence.
You say there is zero reason, but would you say that a person who was abused by their parents, and I mean literally abused, should have to look after their parents in their old age?