Zapiro cartoon fury

rpm

Admin
Staff member
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
66,806
Reaction score
5,057
Location
Johannesburg
The latest Zapiro cartoon in the Mail & Guardian has incensed the National Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa), who blasted it as "distasteful" and "deplorable".

The cartoon depicts President Jacob Zuma undoing his pants as Eugene De Kock and Schabir Shaik hold down lady justice. The infamous shower head sketched above Zuma's is etched closer to the president's head.

A speech bubble has Zuma saying: "Begging your pardon."

The cartoon relates to applications for a presidential pardon from both De Kock and Shaik.

Numsa said the caricature "implants in the minds of the public" that Zuma is a rapist despite being cleared of rape charges by a court of law.

"This venomous and personal hatred of President Zuma camouflaged as an artistic skill by Zapiro is a sign of disrespect not only to President Zuma, but to the office and the position he occupies in society as the fourth democratically elected Head of State," the union said in a statement.

"Whilst we respect and uphold the Constitution and freedom of expression, it does not give cartoonists licence to undermine the fundamental rights to dignity as guaranteed in the Constitution."

It also described the cartoon as "reckless" through depicting a woman about to be raped in a country wracked by violence and abuse against women.

Numsa demanded that the newspaper and Zapiro apologise to Zuma and that the SA Human Rights Commission take action against the cartoonist.

The presidency confirmed that Zuma met Eugene de Kock, who served 14 years of a 212-year-sentence for apartheid era atrocities, prompting speculation that he is considering pardoning the former Vlakplaas commander, nicknamed "Prime Evil", as a political trade-off for a reprieve for Shaik.

Shaik was controversially granted medical parole last year after serving two years and four months of a 15-year jail term for fraud and corruption, relating in part to an alleged bribe he arranged between Zuma and a French arms dealer.

The presidency this week confirmed it had received Shaik's application for pardon.

http://www.mg.co.za/cartoons/15jan10xzapiro.gif
 
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO rpm has out zapiro'ed me :mad: :D

o well goes to link it in zapiro thread.
 
The presidency confirmed that Zuma met Eugene de Kock, who served 14 years of a 212-year-sentence for apartheid era atrocities, prompting speculation that he is considering pardoning the former Vlakplaas commander, nicknamed "Prime Evil", as a political trade-off for a reprieve for Shaik.

A political trade-off with who, for God's sake?
 
Why do we actually need this presidential pardon system. I know it is in the constitution, but why do we need it? Is it because we do not trust our justice system, or is it just a political instrument?

Personally I think it just makes a mockery of our justice system.
 
blasted it as "distasteful" and "deplorable".
Translation:
Funny, and true.

(translation service provided at no extra cost)

Zuma is not automatically entitled to respect. He has to earn it. And his position means he has to work that much harder to do so.

The solution here would have been quite simple - immediately admitting to having received the applications for a pardon and publicly torn them up.

A political trade-off with who, for God's sake?
I'm quite happy for both of them to rot in jail.
 
Why do we actually need this presidential pardon system. I know it is in the constitution, but why do we need it? Is it because we do not trust our justice system, or is it just a political instrument?

Personally I think it just makes a mockery of our justice system.
I'm not sure of the rationale, but it's not unique to South Africa.
 
Why do we actually need this presidential pardon system. I know it is in the constitution, but why do we need it? Is it because we do not trust our justice system, or is it just a political instrument?
It's an escape route for the skeletons in the closet.
 
Yeah, I'm interested to see why it was invented. My first thought was that political parties could get some bit of mileage out of it, but for the most part, pardons for convicted criminals are usually hugely unpopular with the electorate.

Here is something to ponder about:

Around 2005 the justice department presented a briefing paper to parliament which gave detailed guidelines on the criteria that should be applied when considering such applications.

But the process was never formalised and the paper never surfaced again.

However, it has been reliably learnt that the recommendations of this paper have been intermittently used by government, and Selfe has confirmed that the document is the basis of draft legislation the DA plans to file with parliament's speaker's office by the end of this week.

Some of the guidelines in the paper, entitled "The Power to Pardon" and which the FM has seen, are not dissimilar to some of the issues raised in the two court cases.

The paper notes that pardons are usually granted for less serious offences.

Where a more serious offence is concerned, it suggests that the matter be submitted to "the relevant director of public prosecutions for his or her comment and the relevant case records, if still available, are studied before a recommendation is made".

In view of the high level of crime in SA, it urges that "a very strict policy" be applied (see box).

"If these guidelines are applied, then none of the current crop of applicants [for presidential pardons] will actually qualify," says Selfe. "We are saying that the president can grant pardons, but he has to take other factors into consideration when making this decision."

http://www.fm.co.za/10/0115/features/cfeat.htm
 
Zapiro is a muppet. Thanks to twits like him we sit with Zuma in power today.

People taking somebody who voted for the ANC seriously gives a good indication why this country is in the state it is :rolleyes:
 
Zapiro is a muppet. Thanks to twits like him we sit with Zuma in power today.

People taking somebody who voted for the ANC seriously gives a good indication why this country is in the state it is :rolleyes:
I take it you'd rather he voted CP?
 
I'd rather he chopped off his fingers.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X