Zuma comments on baby

Ahh, so it is his culture you have the issue with.

In this instance, not explicitly, no. It's the fact that he is a corrupt, promiscuous, pandering-to-the-masses, uneducated fool that I have an issue with. The cultural element? Well, how's about the masses blindly following the nut because he spent years spewing exactly the crap they eat up.
 
If any other president from any other country did what Jacob 'D**khead' Zuma did they would be impeached for moral reasons. They would be considered not to have the ability to choose the right decisions on moral grounds. This is the problem. He is the President, not you and me. We can screw around as much as we like, the President is holding the highest office in the land, as such, he is held to a different standard.
 
So none of you making these derogatory comments has had sex?

I am too sure how that question is relevant to the current debate. This impacts on Zuma's credibility as a moral leader. I think it has been pretty much shot to pieces by himself...
 
Fixed!
Ahh, after all these years you changed your Signature, What a lyer! What a feat. So we got through to you, that was a thick scull. So the SA do gooders site is not your link anymore, What a change of heart. Why did you change it. Because you were ashamed of your misleading information and efforts, got cold feet or dishearted by the real facts emerging? Well I must say you may keep your cloth as you should first wipe the egg and Scit of your face due to all the misleading information you used to link too. Now you just need to wake up and grow up to see the real facts in SA.

Antowan, please PM me with a response as to whether this post was worthy of an infraction. Or was the insult subtle enough? Thanks.
 
Why do you not PM Antowan?

Because as much as I want a response from a mod I would also like to quote the thread before it gets edited. I have seen this happen with a number of posts by some people.

I'm interested in learning what you can and can't get away with on this forum. There seems to be a line. Just interested in learning where that line is.
 
LancelotSA causing k@k again? Seems to be just about every thread now. Trouble follows him like a stinky fart :D
 
LancelotSA causing k@k again? Seems to be just about every thread now. Trouble follows him like a stinky fart :D

The problem appears to be that if your opinion differs from the general consensus of the predominantly white, male demographic on this forum you get watched a lot more carefully than others. The "yes men" will obviously never be in trouble. I made a suggestion via PM that infractions are made public for the sake of transparency. If it was common knowledge that infractions were handed out with as much ease to those on all sides of an "argument" then we'd all be happy. It just seems that certain views are favoured. I may be totally wrong which is the reason I addressed it in here.

It also seems that certain insults are missed if you do not make them too obvious. My view is that if it is obvious to a reasonable man that it was an insult it should not matter how veiled it was.

As an aside can you for one minute imagine how boring this forum would be if we all shared the same opinion on everything.....

With Antowan's permission I will happily share the example from this thread. I will wait for his permission as if I don't next thing I will receive an infraction for sharing something communicated via PM. :D
 
he never has corruptions -> media fault
he sleeps with an aids girl -> media fault
he has a baby with a young girl -> media fault
he has many many wives -> media fault
he has a big house using taxpayers' money to build-> media fault

:sick: when he will grow up ........ I mean his IQ....

I wish .........

he is NEVER a president of the republic -> media fault :D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X