100 million Windows 8 licenses sold

I have 3

One Normal + one Pro, and one with the free media upgrade.

None of them are in use. So numbers sold does not mean much in my eyes. Esp seeing that its sold to Retailers/OEM's and not end users.
 
100million licences sold out of a total of 1.5billion PCs running Windows translates to about 7% of all Windows PCs.

The stat counters right now tell us that Win8 is on about 4% of all Windows PCs compared to 12% for Win7 in about the same period of time. Can MyBB shed some light on this disparity. Further, if 100million is = to 7%, which is about the same amount sold of Win7 in its 1st 6 months, how is it that Win7 was on 12% of all Win PCs, whereas Win8 is only on ~4%?

These figures and stats infos are puzzling.

But, 100million in 6 months looks great for MS. They also had 7% of the tablet market's sales in Q1 2013.
 
I have 3

One Normal + one Pro, and one with the free media upgrade.

None of them are in use. So numbers sold does not mean much in my eyes. Esp seeing that its sold to Retailers/OEM's and not end users.

I also have one, which I have never used and have no intention of using at present.
 
... So numbers sold does not mean much in my eyes. Esp seeing that its sold to Retailers/OEM's and not end users.

All the end users are duped into buying it pre-installed. The ones with smart children to assist fork out a bit extra and buy W7. (The ones with really smart children get Ubuntu or Mint for free)

From article:
We know customers like touch laptops
Yes, as long as they come with automatic wipers to clean finger marks every 3 min.
 
I've got two computers running it. One upgrade license that I got for R135 and one pre-installed on a new laptop.
I don't have an issue with Windows 8. But I'd still be on Windows 7 if it wasn't for the cheap upgrade offer they had.
 
I really don't see what all the hate towards Win8 is about, I'm using it and loving it, much better than Win7 was, and quicker to navigate, improved copying, and lots of other nice improvements...
 
You okies make me laugh. Win8 is actually a better OS than 7 - it has made improvements to Win7 (for one, copying is a lot better handled in 8). However, some Win8 features I could do without - like Metro! It's at least very easy to disable and who needs a start menu? Everyone, right? It's also easy to put back!

As for Ubuntu, it's rather far behind especially since Unity came out with such a horrible layout and task launcher - they're trying too hard to look and feel like Apple. Also, it's not as easy to revert this fugly layout back to the original looking Ubuntu. Then we have Kubuntu which has kept the majority of the UI/Layout the same for the past few years now. Granted Valve is starting to develop/port games over to Linux but it won't entice me over to Unix any time soon.

Each OS has its advantages and disadvantages but I think Win8 is better than it's predecessor and the Unix distros.
 
You okies make me laugh. Win8 is actually a better OS than 7 - it has made improvements to Win7 (for one, copying is a lot better handled in 8). However, some Win8 features I could do without - like Metro! It's at least very easy to disable and who needs a start menu? Everyone, right? It's also easy to put back!

As for Ubuntu, it's rather far behind especially since Unity came out with such a horrible layout and task launcher - they're trying too hard to look and feel like Apple. Also, it's not as easy to revert this fugly layout back to the original looking Ubuntu. Then we have Kubuntu which has kept the majority of the UI/Layout the same for the past few years now. Granted Valve is starting to develop/port games over to Linux but it won't entice me over to Unix any time soon.

Each OS has its advantages and disadvantages but I think Win8 is better than it's predecessor and the Unix distros.

That's your opinion.

I personally dislike Windows 8. Metro is good for touch screen devices. Laptop and computers are generally not - thus, the UI fails. When a UI fails as much as Windows 8's does - you loose consumers who are accustom to a particular layout. Microsoft changed too much, too quickly.
 
You okies make me laugh. Win8 is actually a better OS than 7 - it has made improvements to Win7 (for one, copying is a lot better handled in 8). However, some Win8 features I could do without - like Metro! It's at least very easy to disable and who needs a start menu? Everyone, right? It's also easy to put back!

As for Ubuntu, it's rather far behind especially since Unity came out with such a horrible layout and task launcher - they're trying too hard to look and feel like Apple. Also, it's not as easy to revert this fugly layout back to the original looking Ubuntu. Then we have Kubuntu which has kept the majority of the UI/Layout the same for the past few years now. Granted Valve is starting to develop/port games over to Linux but it won't entice me over to Unix any time soon.

Each OS has its advantages and disadvantages but I think Win8 is better than it's predecessor and the Unix distros.

Hey if Microsoft themself admit that they stuffed up, who are we to argue for and against the matter?

The Financial Times is reporting that Microsoft plans to "reverse course over key elements of its Windows 8 operating system" when Windows Blue, a so-called iterative update, rolls out later this year.

In an interview, Tammy Reller, head of marketing and finance for the Windows business, apparently told the newspaper that some of the most fundamental aspects of Windows 8 will be changed in the updated version of the OS. Sadly, she refused to go into detail about exactly what the changes might be. She did, however, admit that, during the development of Windows 8, "the learning curve is definitely real".

The Financial Times claims this is "one of the most prominent admissions of failure for a new mass-market consumer product since Coca-Cola’s New Coke fiasco nearly 30 years ago".

Arguably, Windows 8's reception has been a mixed bag. It's fresh, contemporary design has earned it plenty of admirers, but many users have typically reported that they've found it confusing. Perhaps the tweaks that Reller alludes to will place it in the middle ground.
Source: http://gizmodo.com/financial-times-microsoft-pulls-windows-8-u-turn-493265011 via http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/330c8b...ulls-windows-8-u-turn-493265011#axzz2SaWCWBfU
 
... Metro is good for touch screen devices. Laptop and computers are generally not - thus, the UI fails. When a UI fails as much as Windows 8's does - you loose consumers who are accustom to a particular layout. Microsoft changed too much, too quickly.

That's your opinion.

I prefer Win 8 and have come to appreciate metro. I don't use metro apps, but find it much faster to open programs with than the start menu used to be. I use Win7, Win8, WinXP and Fedora (LXDE) on various devices, and of all I much prefer Win 8.
 
I have 3

One Normal + one Pro, and one with the free media upgrade.

None of them are in use. So numbers sold does not mean much in my eyes. Esp seeing that its sold to Retailers/OEM's and not end users.

I dont think they care how many you bought, as long as you bought them, or who bought them, as long as somebody bought them :D
 
I bought a Windows 8 license when that R120 deal was on. Activated it on Parallels and then deleted it a few weeks later. Dual booting OS X and Ubuntu 13.04 now.
 
I have a Windows 8 Pro key, I installed it, my touchpad gesture's didn't work (I dont know when Dell is going to make a Windows 8 compatible driver). My modem kept dc more.

I moved back to Windows 7 Home Premium, I will give Windows 8 another try when Windows Blue update is out.
 
All the end users are duped into buying it pre-installed. The ones with smart children to assist fork out a bit extra and buy W7. (The ones with really smart children get Ubuntu or Mint for free)

From article:

Yes, as long as they come with automatic wipers to clean finger marks every 3 min.

My response to Windows 8 was to, after many years using various windows OS, buy a MacBook :)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X