LifelongGamer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2005
- Messages
- 455
- Reaction score
- 0
Pardon my intrusion ...
As a company offering a branded service, it is in VM's interest to inspect product manufactured for them by a third-party. A random sample to make sure that what they sell to consumers does in fact work as intended. Yes, shortcuts can be done here, but in the long-run it'll only serve to give them a bad reputation and result in lower sales.
I know that VM was in a rush to launch and 'get to market' but that's no excuse to release faulty sims into the market and cause customer frustration. Due diligence should've been taken. This should apply for every company in South Africa - I'm not picking or taking sides, merely highlighting that companies should take pride in the services they offer and then hopefully consumerism will grow.
While I understand your statement, I disagree with the passing of blame solely to the manufacturers.Piesang said:The problem is this: Cellphone companies don't manufacture their own sim cards. It is manufactured for them by other companies. If they receive faulty sims then they are not to be held responsible but the companies that manufacture the sims are the ones that have to be held responsible.
Your e-mail was forwarded at 12:10.
As a company offering a branded service, it is in VM's interest to inspect product manufactured for them by a third-party. A random sample to make sure that what they sell to consumers does in fact work as intended. Yes, shortcuts can be done here, but in the long-run it'll only serve to give them a bad reputation and result in lower sales.
I know that VM was in a rush to launch and 'get to market' but that's no excuse to release faulty sims into the market and cause customer frustration. Due diligence should've been taken. This should apply for every company in South Africa - I'm not picking or taking sides, merely highlighting that companies should take pride in the services they offer and then hopefully consumerism will grow.