killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
why does andy grey not mention his constant swearing

why does he not mention that mach looked like he was going to get a red card? only benitez never saw it

why does he not mention the swearing at the ref the whole time prior to the booking?

why does he not mention, did mach need to get involved in something that had nothing to do with him?

why does he not mention the fact that players should not even talk to the ref, i have never in my life seen a decision reversed

funny how this andy person does not mention the 40 minutes of abuse the ref had to put up with

how many tackles did mach get away with and then swear at the ref

plz the ref was totally correct in sending him off and i cannot believe ppl are actually defending the idiot
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
why does andy grey not mention his constant swearing

why does he not mention that mach looked like he was going to get a red card? only benitez never saw it

why does he not mention the swearing at the ref the whole time prior to the booking?

why does he not mention, did mach need to get involved in something that had nothing to do with him?

why does he not mention the fact that players should not even talk to the ref, i have never in my life seen a decision reversed

funny how this andy person does not mention the 40 minutes of abuse the ref had to put up with

how many tackles did mach get away with and then swear at the ref

plz the ref was totally correct in sending him off and i cannot believe ppl are actually defending the idiot


Now Killa don't make me watch the whole game again and pick out how many Manure players swore at the ref. You telling me that every one of them that swore were a question away from a yellow card? :eek:
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
strange alan because i saw a very angry mach swearing at every decision, i did not see any united player swearing for 40 minutes and abusing the ref

yes im sure they did swear alan but the question is where they already walking a thin a line and did any of them swear at the ref for 40 minutes

the answer is no

when your on a yellow card you act like an angel, mach was the devil man

aggg but whateva liverpool would not have won anyhow considering they played like a 3rd division side before his sending off
 

shadow_man

Executive Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
6,200
Looking at initial investment/profit return % he was not.

J

jsheed explain this to me

ronaldo has gone up by 40 odd million
toure has gone up by lets call it 9 million

how is making 40 million off one player worse than making 9 million off another

lol how can u think 40 million is worse than 9 million

ronaldo was a much better buy by a mile considering they could make 40 million as opposed to toure's small 9 million

ronaldo was good business :)

o alan i have seen scholes dismissed alot and he deserve's it because he cannot tackle lol but i dont sit and defend an oke who obviously deserves to be sent off

im sorry but your stance on mach is rubbish and you know it
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
profit return you say

so 40 million profit is not as good as 9 million profit

i dunno i would rather buy players for 12 million sell them for 50 million than buy players for 150k and sell them for 9 million

i suppose if you look at arsenal's lack of success you have to put it down to buying cheap where as united buy expensive and make more money because they go further in comps

maybe arsenal could have held on to the title if they had better players and a bigger squad but they are more focused on making 8 million off a player instead of 40 million
 

icyrus

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
8,600
why does andy grey not mention his constant swearing

Because andy grey is a know-nothing idiot of the highest order.

The scousers are, as usual, delusional. They seem to think that the sending off changed the game where in fact the reality is that they were lucky not to be 3 down already at that stage.

As for the sending off, the guy can have no complaints. He spent 40 minutes swearing at the ref and acting like and idiot when already on a yellow card - in a week where dissent has been incredibly hilighted - and then runs across the whole pitch, forcing his way past a teammate who was trying to hold him back, to give the ref more lip. Despite that the ref warned him right there and then - again - but he persisted and got what he deserved.

But nevermind, let the scousers have their delusions. Its not like they will suddenly wake up an realize that they are a shabby 4th-place-at-best team - if they manage to hold on that is.
 
Last edited:

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
Because andy grey is a no-nothing idiot of the highest order.

The scousers are, as usual, delusional. They seem to think that the sending off changed the game where in fact the reality is that they were lucky not to be 3 down already at that stage.

As for the sending off, the guy can have no complaints. He spent 40 minutes swearing at the ref and acting like and idiot when already on a yellow card - in a week were dissent has been incredibly hilighted - and then runs across the whole pitch, forcing his way past a teammate who was trying to hold him back, to give the ref more lip. Despite that the ref warned him right there and then - again - but he persisted and got what he deserved.

But nevermind, let the scousers have their delusions. Its not like they will suddenly wake up an realize that they are a shabby 4th-place-at-best team - if they manage to hold on that is.

love it hahahaha
 

shadow_man

Executive Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
6,200
Killer what dont you get about % wise fiscally according to stats he was a better buy - im not talking , skill, goals , BUT A FISCAL % - not the amount but the % , 60 times his worth > 4.5x.

J

profit return you say

so 40 million profit is not as good as 9 million profit

i dunno i would rather buy players for 12 million sell them for 50 million than buy players for 150k and sell them for 9 million

i suppose if you look at arsenal's lack of success you have to put it down to buying cheap where as united buy expensive and make more money because they go further in comps

maybe arsenal could have held on to the title if they had better players and a bigger squad but they are more focused on making 8 million off a player instead of 40 million
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
i get that man

you said toure was a better buy because he got back 60 x times what was paid for him

so what thats only 9 million

ronaldo is worth 40 million more than they paid for him

thats 31 million more ronaldo is worth

who gives a crap about percentages when your talking 30 million

toure was not even close to a good buy compared to ronaldo no matter if toure is worth 150 times what was paid for him

in terms of money ronaldo was a gold mine and toure was a copper mine

so i understand what your getting at with the whole percentage thing but big business is only worried about the bottom line and boy o boy is ronaldo a good bottom line :)

so wenger must buy players for 10 million and make them 50 million players because the accounts would like 40 million more than they would like 9 million :)
 

icyrus

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
8,600
Killer what dont you get about % wise fiscally according to stats he was a better buy - im not talking , skill, goals , BUT A FISCAL % - not the amount but the % , 60 times his worth > 4.5x.

J

No team of any merit (if any at all) considers the players they buy on a fiscal return value.
 

theratman

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
11,965
jsheed explain this to me

ronaldo has gone up by 40 odd million
toure has gone up by lets call it 9 million

how is making 40 million off one player worse than making 9 million off another

lol how can u think 40 million is worse than 9 million

ronaldo was a much better buy by a mile considering they could make 40 million as opposed to toure's small 9 million

ronaldo was good business :)

o alan i have seen scholes dismissed alot and he deserve's it because he cannot tackle lol but i dont sit and defend an oke who obviously deserves to be sent off

im sorry but your stance on mach is rubbish and you know it

Dont forget Ronaldo is 4 years younger than toure and everyone wants him..

You cant really compare a attacking midfielder to a defender in money terms..
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
i dunno hey

what defender was bought for 30 million

im thinking ferdinand

wonder how vidic is worth and evra im sure alot more toure :)
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
why he is a legend

vidic evra and ferdinand are the reason united have the best defence in the league
 

theratman

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
11,965
It seems like a good deal now though doesn't it?


I like Rio but 30mill is kinda steep,he's world class but spending 30mill on a defender is a risk but fair enough its paid off.

Oh and killadoob,I was whooping and hollering when we beat Fulham!!!!6 points clear!Yeah boy!
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
They seem to think that the sending off changed the game where in fact the reality is that they were lucky not to be 3 down already at that stage.

Where'd I say that?

Oh wait he's ignoring me. Then again he referred to a post of mine just after supposedly ignoring me :eek:
 

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
alan

liverpool had no hope and as IC says where lucky rooney cannot hit the back of the net at the moment or it would have 4-0 at half time hahah

i think the sending off actually helped liverpool because they went totally defensive and only 2 latish goals made is 3-0

i think if mach had stayed on then it would have been more :)

yea big up to newcastle they needed to win the games against the botton 5 in order to stay up and so far they are doing that
 

shadow_man

Executive Member
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
6,200
No team of any merit (if any at all) considers the players they buy on a fiscal return value.

Yes they do the modern club is a business - then you have endorsements, shirt sales, exclusive tv rights blah blah blah.

J
 

icyrus

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
8,600
Yes they do the modern club is a business - then you have endorsements, shirt sales, exclusive tv rights blah blah blah.

J

They may be a business and as you say they probably to consider image rights when they sign a player (see real madrid signing beckham) but I promise you no club worth mentioning considers a players resale value when they buy them - they consider what influence they can have on the pitch.
 
Top