South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
A great injustice if people dont vote for you ?![]()
I'm glad the conservatives have taken this relatively convincingly. All the major parties are pro-EU, as is business in the UK. An EU exit is extremely unlikely.
A referendum could easily allow an EU exit. If people on the ground vote and not their party leaders or corporate heads.
They got like 15% of the vote yet get 2 seats.
But surely proportional is even worse?
I very much prefer a constituency system to a national proportional roll as we have in SA. Brit MPs have a strong tradition of handling issues for all their constituents. The party vote only means something for large national policy and legislative matters. For local issues, the ordinary woman on the 79 bus talks to her MP no matter what party. And that counts for a lot in my book.
They could work it out somehow. So the party with 40% get 40% of the seats in areas where their wins are by the most % constituency margins
The party with 5% will get seats in areas where their % loss is the least.
A bit of a shlep....but that's why we pay them
The UK has voted overwhelmingly to reject changing the way MPs are elected - dealing a bitter blow to Nick Clegg on top of heavy Lib Dem poll losses.
Officials say 19.1m people voted in the second UK-wide referendum in history - a higher than expected turnout of 41%.
The final result put the Yes vote at 32.1% and the No vote at 67.9%.
Because it wasn't real reform. It wasn't even close to PR.There was a referendum to replace this system and the Brits voted to keep it.
My personal opinion is that a national assembly shouldn't be worrying about what to do with a stray cat in Koeberg road.Fptp is applicable because the MP's are meant to represent voters in constituencies. Basically it's the same as the U.S. Senate except it's only 1 person per "state". I think it's a better system because it ensures that the different character of each region is represented and it also means the MP can't ignore the voters. A system like SA encourages "a cult of the leader" mentality and also means MP's need the favor of the party head honchos to get their job.
Yes , it does have its weaknesses. Either system has its strengths.
Because it wasn't real reform. It wasn't even close to PR.
My personal opinion is that a national assembly shouldn't be worrying about what to do with a stray cat in Koeberg road.
In the UK they're all loony.So did the Loony party win?
In the UK they're all loony.
So did the Loony party win?
That's nice. Looking to a text from the 13th century for modern politics.Its based on the Magna Carta principles where representatives from different parts of the country gathered.