Shaping Policy:
18.8% Download/ 6.25% P2P
Is that minus 18.8% or 18.8% of your full speed? Because if it's the latter then it's definitely not pure internet joy. :erm:
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Shaping Policy:
18.8% Download/ 6.25% P2P
Is that minus 18.8% or 18.8% of your full speed? Because if it's the latter then it's definitely not pure internet joy. :erm:
Is that minus 18.8% or 18.8% of your full speed? Because if it's the latter then it's definitely not pure internet joy. :erm:
Those shaping figures are what's available, per protocol, based on your line speed.
Pretty standard shaping for Uncapped.
Jissus nee. I don't know AfriGuy. The last time I got shaped that bad on downloads I was with OpenWeb on standard uncapped. :erm:
If you're concerned about shaping then perhaps look at a Business Uncapped or Capped account?
If you're concerned about shaping then perhaps look at a Business Uncapped or Capped account?
No idea lol but afrihost has helped alot so far and we'll see if things are fixed up by tonight
Some damning info in OP's HIGHLIGHTED post....
Especially this:
Kindly advise if assistance is still required on the below query. I've ran an interrogation on your line, it is currently syncing at up to 8mbps, with no faults to report about.
Shaping is currently active on the account, at the below percentages, as the hours between 6pm to 22h00 is considered peak time and at present the network is currently underload. Shaping Policy:
18.8% Download/ 6.25% P2P
This is why CAPPED is the only way to go. Oh, and with WA.
This one made me laugh as WA is the only service provider I know of that shapes their capped account. Ask WebAfrica helper he will confirm this.
We've always tried to adopt as honest and transparent policies as possible and have been very open about this subject. Any network that is contended will apply traffic management to some degree. This is why the term unshaped is very problematic as no home customer is truly ever buying 1:1 bandwidth. If you were getting 1:1 bandwidth prices would all have to be massively hiked and ISPs would in essence just become brokers and providers of some configured server hardware. But unfortunately this has become the accepted nomenclature in the industry. People want to hear the word unshaped and if you ethically feel wrong in using the term, people simply say "well company z says unshaped so I will go with them."
Any service offered on a 1:1 basis will have to be covered by an SLA for said service. So unless you are paying for an SLA you are not going to be uncontended. And how is contention managed? Well, by applying traffic management rules of some sort. Which to an end user is just shaping, and a semantic argument that will always have the same net-result in terms of what happens network side.
So while we cannot sign SLAs for guaranteed performance, we can try to let our track record speak for itself when it comes to network management policies and performance. We tend to operate the network with as little contention as possible. We've achieved below 10:1 average network contention by our calculations, for over a year. Employing smart technology means you can do this without customers even noticing any contention, and how we do that is part of the secret sauce that makes our network perform so well. We adopted an approach from day 1 of high volume and low margin. The higher the volumes the better our own economies of scale and the more we can actually lower contention. This is why we encourage others to help us achieve those economies of scale by getting more people on board. What traditionally would be an opportunity by some ISPs to milk the profit, we see as an opportunity to reinvest in the network, as we honestly believe that we have better return on investment with Crystal Web than we would investing that cash elsewhere or buying fancy cars. That's what it boils down to. It means we don't have the massive marketing budgets of other ISPs or huge resources. We instead give that back to subscribers and hope that in return you will be brand advocates for us, while adopting network technology and a business model that becomes more and more efficient with a greater number of users.
So to answer your question succinctly (TL;DR) the term unshaped creates a perception that we don't believe any home product can necessary live up to but is used endemically and has become so ingrained in the nomenclature of buying, that even we have to concede to its use, because people don't want semantic arguments nor to have to understand networking on an in-depth basis. They just want a decent performing internet connection, which is what we try to deliver day in and day out.
I think only CW offer a proper premium package, whereas the others just offer different data caps for shaping.
Afrihost's UNCAPPED network has been shaped for years.
Seems it isn't only WA...
Seems it isn't only WA...

But i have a capped uncapped account from 00:00 to 6pm and then 800 gigs capped never gonna finish it data from 6:01 to 11:59pmSTOP USING UNCAPPED![]()
As I understand it, looking at all ISP's, any uncapped package will be subjected to some sort of shaping depending on network congestion. People sign up for a capped package in order to not suffer any or as little shaping as possible and therefore these users will be given preferential treatment even in "free-time" as they(I) have signed up understanding the clauses and stipulations given by whichever ISP.
If you're concerned about shaping then perhaps look at a Business Uncapped or Capped account?
Before signing up with Crystal Web. I believed this too be true as well.
Im on their premium uncapped account and can say without a doubt that it performs like s capped account.
Great network.