Shake&Bake
Party Liaison
How on earth are ordinary consumers supposed to understand this? There is far too much complexity in pricing in this industry!
Have to agree there.
You might not believe it, but we're actually trying to make it easier for people. My post above is just to explain it to the old hands here who are used to the standard rates.
So instead of having to know the difference between IB and OOB and what it can do to your back-pocket, the new product is much easier to explain to customers.
- You buy a bundle at a certain rate.
- Once you've used up that bundle, you just carry on using data and you won't be penalised.
I.e. (for the 'old hands):
- You don't get charged a high OOB rate.
- You don't have to carefully watch your usage to ensure you don't go OOB.
- You don't have to go through a convoluted process to buy a new bundle.
- You don't have to understand that there is a difference between contract with or without a modem, etc.
So, all in all, it's much easier to understand. And you're protected from OOB bill-shock.
This is the first step (actually the 3rd) to start simplifying the rate structures.
I think that users are being penalised by having to pay more for the "advantage" of BB-A.
It's seems a bit dodge and really doesn't make sense, why one has to pay more.
And still with the 24 month contract - this is where all of our local players are making me
From my perspective as a prepaid user, this product is not appealing.
The "totally free" modem then throws me off and has me wondering why I need to be tied into a lengthy contract and be paying more for data.
Naturally as I'm in the prepaid market, so the modem doesn't interest me.
So what really is up with the higher tariff?
I can't seem to make sense of why the data costs more.
It seems like higher pricing now gets you 7.2, which is seems like it's yet again the same situation there was initially with the levy on access to 3.6.
So does the increase serve the same purpose as the levy there was for 3.6 or does it now subsidise or recover the previous levy on 3.6 which is now gone?
The numbers add up eventually and could easily cover those lost R49 (or whatever the amount was)
From a prepaid stance - I'll stick with MTN in the interim.
Simply put:
VC's BB-A 500 MB = R 279 or R 0.56 p/MB
MTN Prepaid 500 MB = R 189 or R0.38 p/MB
Granted that VC has the same offering on BB-S as the above mentioned MTN pricing.
Stumbling block for me is: Why should I pay more for what really is "less".
7.2 whoopy - those speeds can't be guaranteed.
3.6 is fine by me - reasonable pricing by SA standards (seeing that we have nothing to compare it with)
This proposition can't be seen as innovative by me.
If this is any indication of what the future holds - I'm gonna need some more Vaseline.
Where's our damn price war?