Aquadyne
Expert Member
[/QUOTE] This is not at all what you were saying before.[/QUOTE]
I acknowledged that I omitted a lengthy response for the sake of brevity.
My response was based on the main underlying fact stated by Mike_E that ABSA had stated that the phishing emails CAN originate from the ABSA domain and not just spoofed. In his statement he effectively nullified the discussion point around it being sent from another source and pretending to be from ABSA.
On rereading his point I also see that he quoted the emails as being from @absa.co.za with the only spelling difference being in the part preceding the domain name - however in his words he indicated that the domain name was preceded by an "e".
It is easy to spot the emails where the domain name is different - they are also normally flagged as spam / suspect by mail servers for this very reason.
Yes, some people are not aware of it - but that wasn't my argument. I had moved past that point due to it being addressed in the post by Mike_E
I acknowledged that I omitted a lengthy response for the sake of brevity.
My response was based on the main underlying fact stated by Mike_E that ABSA had stated that the phishing emails CAN originate from the ABSA domain and not just spoofed. In his statement he effectively nullified the discussion point around it being sent from another source and pretending to be from ABSA.
On rereading his point I also see that he quoted the emails as being from @absa.co.za with the only spelling difference being in the part preceding the domain name - however in his words he indicated that the domain name was preceded by an "e".
It is easy to spot the emails where the domain name is different - they are also normally flagged as spam / suspect by mail servers for this very reason.
Yes, some people are not aware of it - but that wasn't my argument. I had moved past that point due to it being addressed in the post by Mike_E
Last edited: