Afrihost Uncapped ADSL Feedback (Pt3)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey Afriman

Look, put it this way, I'll have to go SOMEWHERE come 30 June, and chances are that it will most likely be you guys, but, it's just a little disheartening to read that quite a few users are complaining about the same things we suffer @ OpenWeb.

Most of my usage will come from streaming as I said before with the odd large download. I also VPN into work a lot, but that is usually fine.

My son also plays games online every weekend ( or when I allow him to :D ).

I have a 10Mbps line, but a 4MB account, so capped is going to get used up very quickly I think , especially with streaming. However, I may give that a go for a month and then see how it goes, then maybe upgrade to Uncapped if i see that it is not going to be enough bandwidth, or I'll just go straight uncapped from the get go - will see.

What happens when your Double Data deal expires - do you lose half your bandwidth ? That also puts me off capped at the moment, I don't like feeling restricted, even though I probably may not use all the bandwidth.

Cheers !

I am also curious on the double data. I am considering going that route after this last "minor" setback.
 
Trying to DL KitKat update for my phone...shaped for sure, but I've got turbocharge right?

Click

Nothing.

Restarted router, waited 15min and still nothing.

Afrihost really...becoming a sick joke now honestly.
 
Am I right in saying 10 mbps uncapped account only = R797, but a 10mbps bundle with line is R 897. Surely this cannot be right?
 
For the entire day I've been having this:

Pinging www.google.co.za [173.194.41.152] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.194.41.152: bytes=32 time=557ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.41.152: bytes=32 time=675ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.41.152: bytes=32 time=679ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.41.152: bytes=32 time=643ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 173.194.41.152:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 557ms, Maximum = 679ms, Average = 638ms

Other than that, shaped into the ground. What is going on?
 
For the entire day I've been having this:

Pinging www.google.co.za [173.194.41.152] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.194.41.152: bytes=32 time=557ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.41.152: bytes=32 time=675ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.41.152: bytes=32 time=679ms TTL=53
Reply from 173.194.41.152: bytes=32 time=643ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 173.194.41.152:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 557ms, Maximum = 679ms, Average = 638ms

Other than that, shaped into the ground. What is going on?

Please would you run my second tool (in sig) :)

Z
 
Zertop's "Is it my Line" Results
Basic Report:
Your average ping was 503ms
Your maximum ping was 666ms

Looking at your average ping, there is definitely something wrong with your line-( Please post the results (at the end of the program) into the forum for advice

Detailed Report
Ping results for last hop before account switches to ISP's hardware (Hop 2 on Tracert)

Pinging 105.236.11.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=524ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=533ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=417ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=597ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=666ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=474ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=285ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=459ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=498ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=484ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=584ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=517ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=465ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=470ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=543ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=542ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=562ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=505ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=431ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=403ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=522ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=566ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=570ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=556ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=445ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=496ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=526ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=534ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=471ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=453ms TTL=254

Ping statistics for 105.236.11.1:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 285ms, Maximum = 666ms, Average = 503ms

2014/05/20 21:26:01.72

Zertop, as requested
 
Zertop's "Is it my Line" Results
Basic Report:
Your average ping was 503ms
Your maximum ping was 666ms

Looking at your average ping, there is definitely something wrong with your line-( Please post the results (at the end of the program) into the forum for advice

Detailed Report
Ping results for last hop before account switches to ISP's hardware (Hop 2 on Tracert)

Pinging 105.236.11.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=524ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=533ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=417ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=597ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=666ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=474ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=285ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=459ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=498ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=484ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=584ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=517ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=465ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=470ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=543ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=542ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=562ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=505ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=431ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=403ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=522ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=566ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=570ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=556ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=445ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=496ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=526ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=534ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=471ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.11.1: bytes=32 time=453ms TTL=254

Ping statistics for 105.236.11.1:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 285ms, Maximum = 666ms, Average = 503ms

2014/05/20 21:26:01.72

Zertop, as requested

Definitely looks like a telkom line issue :-(

How does the line perform with a different ISP's account? :)

Z
 
Right. I am home and ready to post some findings.

Speed tests are perfect. Full line speed. Shap shap.

Shaping is 18%/6%

Youtube performance...2mb speed. This morning when shaping was 0% I had full 4mb speed.

Here is the TraceRT data to youtube

Code:
C:\Users\H>tracert youtube.com

Tracing route to youtube.com [173.194.113.174]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  3     9 ms     9 ms     8 ms  105-236-5-1-esr-lo.mtnbusiness.co.za [105.236.5.1]
  4     9 ms     8 ms     9 ms  41.181.201.94
  5    13 ms    10 ms     9 ms  tb-dca-2.za--qux-c.za.mtnbusiness.net [41.181.198.188]
  6    10 ms    10 ms    11 ms  compj-cpt-1.mtnns.net [196.44.18.2]
  7   155 ms   162 ms   154 ms  ls-cr-2.uk--tb-cr-1.za.mtnns.net [196.44.31.113]
  8   168 ms   163 ms   164 ms  am-cr-1.nl--ls-cr-2.uk-a.mtnns.net [196.44.31.183]
  9   162 ms   162 ms   163 ms  am-tpr-1.nl--am-cr-1.nl-a.mtn.net [209.212.111.141]
 10   167 ms   164 ms   164 ms  core2.ams.net.google.com [195.69.145.100]
 11   164 ms   164 ms   166 ms  209.85.254.90
 12   166 ms   165 ms   193 ms  209.85.253.249
 13   170 ms   168 ms   173 ms  209.85.254.227
 14   200 ms   200 ms   208 ms  209.85.255.71
 15   223 ms   170 ms   200 ms  72.14.233.30
 16   203 ms   200 ms   200 ms  72.14.235.213
 17   171 ms   170 ms   173 ms  ham02s12-in-f14.1e100.net [173.194.113.174]

Trace complete.

C:\Users\H>


And here is the screenshot of the what the throughput looks like.

View attachment 119773

As you can see it's up and down and frequently goes to 0. This ONLY happens when shaping is active! Will do some tests now with google DNS used etc.

There is clearly an adverse effect on realtime when shaping is used - in the South anyway - on home uncapped.

Please help Afri Team. Again...this only started last week.


Just to put things in perspective. This morning again - no shaping applied - and youtube ran perfectly. Take a look at the screenshot above in my quote - BROKEN when shaping is applied - vs the one below when no shaping is active and YouTube runs like it should.

working.jpg
 
Last edited:
Guy's I'm on the East which got it's full IPC upgrade. Believe me it got a little better, but it's nowhere what I expected. Still shaped to death until 7-8 in the evening regularly. Don't hold your breath.

Seems the only way to go to get a good internet experience is to pony up for a business account.
 
I don't care about the shaping really...I can dl what I need in the few hours at night when I am unshaped. What I cannot accept is when I am shaped and my realtime services are NOT running like they should due to shaping being active.
 
Hey Afriman

Look, put it this way, I'll have to go SOMEWHERE come 30 June, and chances are that it will most likely be you guys, but, it's just a little disheartening to read that quite a few users are complaining about the same things we suffer @ OpenWeb.

Most of my usage will come from streaming as I said before with the odd large download. I also VPN into work a lot, but that is usually fine.

My son also plays games online every weekend ( or when I allow him to :D ).

I have a 10Mbps line, but a 4MB account, so capped is going to get used up very quickly I think , especially with streaming. However, I may give that a go for a month and then see how it goes, then maybe upgrade to Uncapped if i see that it is not going to be enough bandwidth, or I'll just go straight uncapped from the get go - will see.

What happens when your Double Data deal expires - do you lose half your bandwidth ? That also puts me off capped at the moment, I don't like feeling restricted, even though I probably may not use all the bandwidth.

Cheers !

I think it's always good to give different products a try to see what suits your specific needs. The easiest will always be running a Free GB account, which should give you a basic idea of how Business and Capped should perform. You can also PM me for a discount on your first month on Uncapped to give that a try.

Remember that we're also expecting massive upgrades for the North and South networks, so the experience will change very soon to what we ideally envision for Uncapped internet.
 
Just received a call from the CC team at Afrihost to ask detailed information regarding my problem.

They took down all the information, asked specific questions relating to the problem and have provided me with a test account while they run my account to pin point the problem.

The type of service I've come to expect from Afrihost.

+1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X