Whatever dude, I am not going to get into a debate with you on this matter as we clearly have different view points and will not see eye to eye. Zoning was introduced for 1) commercial reasons (releasing of movies etc) 2) copyright protection.
Fact: Yes you can purchase dvd's from different regions
Fact: You will not get prosecuted for buying and playing different regions on your dvd player
Fact: It is law...but not enforced law.
Fact: It was introduced by movie studios and dvd player manufacturers joined in to proceed region restricted players.
Fact: Hacks were released to over come this problem....a hack by definition is doing something to something which makes the something do what it was not originally intended to do. It was not released as a fix to a problem but originally as a hack cause you were not meant to do this. check copyright law - specifically the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, although it is not a clear cut situation.
Fact: The is a battle going on between the owners of the material, namely the movie studios and the end user. Although dvd player manufacturing companies will not make zone free machines they will also not make zone restricted machines (because they wont sell if they cannot be hacked).
We could debate this matter for years but we will not see eye to eye because the world hasn't come to terms with what is right and what is wrong. I see it like prostitution, its illegal (in SA) yet newspaper advertise these services but prosecution has almost disappeared. It is still illegal but toleranted.......(Sorry to use this as an example, hope it doesn't offend anyone reading this)
Zoning was not introduced for copyright protection.
CSS encryption was as is MacroVision encoding.
Region coding per se is not law. Please quote the relevant
SA law which states that you may not view DVDs outside
of your region.
Region coding is part of the DVD specification from the DVD Consortium/Forum (made up of SONY, Matsu****a, Phillips,
NEC, etc). Its an optional standard.
Just because DISK has the region code flag set it doesn't
mean there is any exclusivity agreement prohibiting
playback of that disk. Rightstuf.com which owns copyright
of many animated and live action DVD titles only sells R1
disks, yet they sell worldwide and wholesale worldwide too.
This is an example of a company which has set the Region
flag (as 1) but is still selling their own DVDs (they produce
content on DVD and even VHS) and sell it for resale
INTERNATIONALLY.
Assuming there is a law as you suggest, prohibiting playback
of Regio 1 DVDs in SA, anyone playing back such DVDs even
with the Company's blessing would be arrested? Giving
an extreme example here.
The DMCA is a US law. It does not apply outside of the US and
as mentioned in an earlier blurb the EU and AU/NZ consider
DVD region coding to be OUT OF LINE with their LAWS.
The DMCA is not per se against DVD player unlocking.
It is against DeCSS and removal of Macrovision, those things
are quasi legal, although format shifting has not been found
to be illegal in the States (I think it's a Fair Use statute).
Ok I'm no lawyer but that's how I understand it. Jeff Bizos
(owner of Amazon) should be behind bars for selling R1 DVDs
to the entire world. He also sells CDs (Sony BMG USA disks)
to countries which fall under SONY BMG X (X = any random
country in the world).