Apple iPhone 16 range unveiled

Oh ffs, here we go with the Dolby show again.
Good way to use those 15mins breaks. Somewhat amusing watching the self awareness deficient Dolby think himself a victim pitted against the entire Apple fan base or something.
 
Why did you register them on face ID?
I was curious.

Remember - I prefer to test things and make my own opinions ... I won't just listen to the marketing. It's the same reason I compared speeds to my old Android phone or tested the highest resolution on Apple Music.
 
Good way to use those 15mins breaks. Somewhat amusing watching the self awareness deficient Dolby think himself a victim pitted against the entire Apple fan base or something.
I'm still waiting for a number of quotes from you though?
Or should we forget it and just move on?

I'm happy either way
 
Lol because you can't answer simple questions.
You said Face ID the most secure biometric system know to man?
And then I showed you how it managed to open similar faces?
And then you asked why they use my phone?

I think you're trying to deflect, again
 
Last edited:
Let us post some more cases.
Are you sure not building a use case around what they offer though?

I know you usually do that ... and this sounds like yet another situation you're doing the same thing. If tomorrow they swapped Face ID & Touch ID ... you'd more than likely swap your answer to sync with what Apple does again?

See - that's what I find strange about you
 
Are you sure not building a use case around what they offer though?

I know you usually do that ... and this sounds like yet another situation you're doing the same thing. If tomorrow they swapped Face ID & Touch ID ... you'd more than likely swap your answer to sync with what Apple does again?

See - that's what I find strange about you
Says the one going on about twins.
 
Says the one going on about twins.
What? You make no sense

Talk in your mother tongue and I'll translate.

PS Face ID also gets similar looking people - it doesn't even need to be twins. Anywy my point is they should offer it as an option under the display. You don't need to use it.



 
What? You make no sense

Talk in your mother tongue and I'll translate.

PS Face ID also gets similar looking people - it doesn't even need to be twins. Anywy my point is they should offer it as an option under the display. You don't need to use it.




Want me to post more examples?

Google says the phone was tested to meet the standard of an unverified fingerprint unlocking with a probability of one in 50,000.
FaceID is more secure - case closed.
 
Last edited:
Lol the budget M3 still smokes it in single core performance and keeps up with multicore even with 4 less cores.
View attachment 1756588
I said efficiency, not performance. plus 4% is hardly something you will notice, but 29% multithread is significant.

Despite being a node behind Apple and having 4 more cores, they are more power efficient that Apple, That points to a significantly better CPU design. And that is even with the handycap that is Windows.

Also considering the die size difference, and being a node behind, they do seem to be more space efficient than Apple, especially considering how limited the IO on the baseline apple chip is vs the Snapdragon.
The die size of the snapdragon is about 171mm squared
The die size of the M3 is about 141mm squared

Its not suprising since its the same people and apple silicon improvements since M1 have been mostly incremental and related to the node improvements from TSMC.

The question is if they can come up with a competitor for the M Pro and M Max chips.

 
I said efficiency, not performance. plus 4% is hardly something you will notice, but 29% multithread is significant.

Despite being a node behind Apple and having 4 more cores, they are more power efficient that Apple, That points to a significantly better CPU design. And that is even with the handycap that is Windows.

Also considering the die size difference, and being a node behind, they do seem to be more space efficient than Apple, especially considering how limited the IO on the baseline apple chip is vs the Snapdragon.
The die size of the snapdragon is about 171mm squared
The die size of the M3 is about 141mm squared

Its not suprising since its the same people and apple silicon improvements since M1 have been mostly incremental and related to the node improvements from TSMC.

The question is if they can come up with a competitor for the M Pro and M Max chips.


I do feel genuinely sorry for Qualcomm though. They go through all the insane effort of making a competitor to one of the most disruptive lines of CPUs ever developed, and they have to compete with Apple using Microsoft software.
 
I said efficiency, not performance. plus 4% is hardly something you will notice, but 29% multithread is significant.

Despite being a node behind Apple and having 4 more cores, they are more power efficient that Apple, That points to a significantly better CPU design. And that is even with the handycap that is Windows.

Also considering the die size difference, and being a node behind, they do seem to be more space efficient than Apple, especially considering how limited the IO on the baseline apple chip is vs the Snapdragon.
The die size of the snapdragon is about 171mm squared
The die size of the M3 is about 141mm squared

Its not suprising since its the same people and apple silicon improvements since M1 have been mostly incremental and related to the node improvements from TSMC.

The question is if they can come up with a competitor for the M Pro and M Max chips.

Source?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X