South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Google test against the same number as the article I posted says so not sure why you signalling out Touch ID?I was thinking about this.
So Touch ID is 20 x less secure than Face ID … and there are videos showing people getting into Face ID. Shouldn’t there be 20 x more videos with Touch ID breaches?
I also see they say Touch ID - so I’m assuming that they’re saying is only tough Touch ID is rubbish? But with a fingerprint being one of the few totally unique identifiers on humans - why have Apple used such a low resolution sensor? Half added, really.
I mean don’t they sell 100m+ of these phones each generation? 1:50 000 is terrible … but I’d still expect to see many more videos
… the spec sheet you posted three or four times singles out Touch ID as being insecure & unreliable? @SauRoNZA agreedGoogle test against the same number as the article I posted says so not sure why you signalling out Touch ID?
Others are the same.… the spec sheet you posted three or four times singles out Touch ID as being insecure & unreliable? @SauRoNZA agreed
- Google says the phone was tested to meet the standard of an unverified fingerprint unlocking with a probability of one in 50,000.
… because it’s an industry standard 1:50,000 as a minimum?Others are the same.
Whatever gets you through the day.… because it’s an industry standard 1:50,000 as a minimum?
Look - if there’s an Android with fingerprint detection around my house, I know it’s secure.
If it uses faces recognition, I know that people in the family can open it.
The best would be both - but because Apple only supports one, you’ve amended your thinking to sync with them. If they bring back Touch ID, you’ll amend again
That’s how you work
I think if you follow the conversation, it isHow is that embarrassing?
Oh yea?My issue is your neutrality ie. there is almost always some narrative push or skewed agenda.
Intelligence?Oh yea?
Like when?
I hear that quite often and not a person can quote a single time in 3 years about any narrative .
Hoping you can apply some intelligence this time and it’s not just talk. Again
I don't mind you pulling up any "highlights" I am always game for an intelligent convo.
My issue is your neutrality ie. there is almost always some narrative push or skewed agenda.
Not your best joke but it’s something to break the “tension” lolYou need to put more Marcus Brownlee and Who's the Boss stuff up. You're falling behind.
Not your best joke but it’s something to break the “tension” lol![]()
But this time it will be on the side of the phone. Much innovation, much brave, Totally not been in other phones for a decade.Well, this is embarresing @Smiggles @SauRoNZA ... pretty much exactly as I said (again)
![]()
Touch ID Set to Return to Apple's iPhone Lineup Next Year
Touch ID, the fingerprint authentication technology that has been missing from Apple's flagship iPhone lineup since 2017, is reportedly set to make a comeback in a side button configuration on a new iPhone model that could arrive as soon as next year. Apple's first foldable iPhone may see the...www.macrumors.com
Maybe you can give an example?We’ve had a “discussion” previously on your objectivity on the subject. Obviously there was no resolution, there never is.
One of the reasons people don’t like interacting with you wrt anything Apple there is never any neutral viewpoint coming through
There is legit a few, unfortunately it does not live rent-free in my head like it does for you so it’s harder me to pull.Maybe you can give an example?
You can’t just say ‘you have an agenda’ and then slink away? Or ‘you are not neutral’ and then give no examples?
That’s a pityThere is legit a few …. so it’s harder me to pull.
Sure.I’ve got no problem engaging in a good debate, I just ask for a level of objectivity.
Well, we would first need that objectivity from the other side. Also would help if they'd used an Android flagship in the last 5 years, or ever.There is legit a few, unfortunately it does not live rent-free in my head like it does for you so it’s harder me to pull.
And no I don’t “slink” away, don’t confuse me for another fella here who chimes in, gets called out & then does a varnishing act.
I’ve got no problem engaging in a good debate, I just ask for a level of objectivity.