Article: Dewani walks free

-The dead guy who said he was paid to kill her.
-The video of him paying the guy
-The fact that he got out the car alive and she did not.
-The random way she was killed in the hijacking situation.

From the defence side:
1. The dead guy says he was paid, but he doesn't pinpoint Dewani as the one who paid him, rather there was a middle man in Tonga. So only Tonga can directly link Dewani to the crime, and Tonga was a very bad witness.
2. He also paid the staff in the hotel, and he allegedly also paid the police officer who testified. So Dewani paid a lot of people, which absolutely helped his case since not all the people he paid were implicated in the case.
3. The shooters wanted to rape the wife, which is why they let Dewani go.
4. There was a struggle between the shooter and Anni which led to the shooting.
 
Is there not a meeting between Dewani and one of the killers in the hotel lobby caught on video (video happened after the killing)?

Is there no phone record evidence?


that means absolutely nothing. a video with no sound proves nothing. he could have met with those people and claimed that they were to be his tour guides.
 
It is an unfortunate thread title. We have to assume he is innocent and on that basis a poor chap visited SA on his honeymoon and his wife was murdered. Where is the 'walking free'? How do you ever get free of **** like that?
 
Will the state now prosecute the middle man who arranged for the killers? Not Tonga, the guy who contacted the two "hijackers" on behalf of Tongo on behalf of Dewani. He's the only one who received immunity and he was a pretty poor witness too. I think a lot of people were paid off in both the killing & trial.
 
Just look at state institutions and you will have your answer.

The private sector seems to have, on average, far more talented people working there than in the State (mainly related to pay).

I worked in the private sector for 10 years, and in the public sector for 2 years, and I think your statement is misguided and without any
foundation whatsoever.

Well, I could say the same - I worked the state and now in the private sector, and I can only but agree that the state is in trouble

Insert SABC chair story here, Mdluli story here, SAPS story here
 
Well, I could say the same - I worked the state and now in the private sector, and I can only but agree that the state is in trouble

Insert SABC chair story here, Mdluli story here, SAPS story here

The problem with public sector is not so much the civil servants, the problem starts with political appointments at Minister and DG level.
 
From the defence side:
1. The dead guy says he was paid, but he doesn't pinpoint Dewani as the one who paid him, rather there was a middle man in Tonga. So only Tonga can directly link Dewani to the crime, and Tonga was a very bad witness.
2. He also paid the staff in the hotel, and he allegedly also paid the police officer who testified. So Dewani paid a lot of people, which absolutely helped his case since not all the people he paid were implicated in the case.
3. The shooters wanted to rape the wife, which is why they let Dewani go.
4. There was a struggle between the shooter and Anni which led to the shooting.

Yep, makes sense too
 
It is an unfortunate thread title. We have to assume he is innocent and on that basis a poor chap visited SA on his honeymoon and his wife was murdered. Where is the 'walking free'? How do you ever get free of **** like that?

The most honest post sofar. +1
 
Another murderer walks free due to complete and utter mess from the cops and prosecution. Do I think Dewani had her killed? 100 percent

My feeling too.
SAPS threw the case by letting him return to the UK and I cannot help wondering if a bit of cash greased his passage.
 
Last edited:
Shoot her through the door Jack
Let the others screw it up Jack
Set yourself free
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X